Dunkin' Franchisees Tell How They Really Feel

Survey Results Show Overwhelming Dissatisfaction Among Franchisees

BOSTON, Mass. (Blue MauMau) - At the International Franchise Association's 48th Annual Convention in Orlando this week, Dunkin' Donuts had a strong presence with 46 members attending. The event, "Building the Future Together," continually acknowledged Bill Rosenberg, founder of Dunkin Donuts and IFA, as a leader in promoting balance and fairness in franchising. One famous Rosenberg quote: "In order to have a healthy franchise system, you have to have healthy franchisees and a healthy franchisor."

But this morning the DD Independent Franchise Owners, Inc. (DDIFO) released survey results from 100 New England and New York franchisees, representing 1000 shops, showing an overwhelming dissatisfaction in the way Dunkin' Brands is distributing its products. The franchisor has signed agreements with Sara Lee, Proctor & Gamble and Hess gas stations, allowing them to place Dunkin's number one product, coffee, into grocery stores, gas stations, kiosks, private cafeterias and other retail outlets. But according to DDIFO President Mark A. Dubinsky by doing so they will ultimately devalue the iconic Dunkin' coffee brand.

Franchisees Express Concerns Regarding Dunkin' Partnerships

The survey was conducted in January 2007, through Zoomerang. Despite the company's expansion into new U.S. and international markets--7,900 shops in 31 countries--99 percent of survey respondents said their cash flow from operations has been declining for some time and is showing little sign of improvement. Between 97 and 98 percent said they object to Dunkin's partnership with Sara Lee food services division and Hess gas stations in distributing its products. And 59 percent feel the P&G deal devalues their franchise. P&G has been allowed to sell coffee in supermarkets, drug stores and off-price retailers.

"We have concerns about operating standards," and Dubinsky asks, "Are they going to be held at the same standards that franchisees are held to in their franchise stores? We don't know." He also said they need to have the company focus on things that actually drive customers to the stores, not to divert traffic away from them. " We want them to focus on what is good for franchisees. As franchisee sales increase so do corporate royalties." According to Dubinsky, franchisees spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to set up each individual store, only to then have the company do things that divert traffic from them. He said, "That is crazy."

Regarding Dunkin's statement recently that it intends to do an IPO in the not too distant future, Dubinsky said, " We believe they are doing things that are in their own-self interest which could be at the expense of the franchisee's best interest." He said the franchisor is owned by a trio of equity firms.

Franchisee Attorney Warns Dunkin', A House Divided Cannot Stand.

Kevin McCarthy, an attorney in Massachusetts who represents several Dunkin' Donuts franchisees was surprised by the survey results. "I was shocked to see the nearly unanimous percentage of Dunkin' franchisees who oppose this new strategic direction." He said the reported loss of sales, decline in shop profits and perhaps most important of all the devaluation of the Dunkin' brand should raise a "BIG RED FLAG" to Dunkin' management and equity owners. "This certainly does not portend well for any upcoming public offering."

He also feels it is sad to see communications between a major franchisor such as Dunkin' Brands and its franchisees get so bad that the franchisees have to resort to major press releases to finally express themselves on critical strategic issues such as the cutting of outside deals with major consumer retailers like P&G. He also explains, "Forcing Dunkin' franchisees to invest heavily in pizza and flatbread ovens and related products when their core business is said to be under stress is the exact same mistake Starbucks just made - a mistake Starbucks just reversed as they recently announced that they were discontinuing their non-core oven related sandwich business to re-focus on their traditional coffee business."

McCarthy's recommendation to Dunkin' management is to start communicating better with their franchisees. He said they obviously have little knowledge of the fact that they do not support strategies that attempt to grow the corporate bottom line at the expense of the franchise owner's bottom line. He asks, "If the franchisees don't agree with a corporate strategy then does Dunkin' management really expect the public will? "A house divided cannot stand".

Dunkin' Insists Partnerships Will Fortify Company's Position in Competitive Marketplace

But according to a statement from Stephen J. Caldeira, Chief Communications and Public Affairs Officer for Dunkin’ Brands, Inc. the company has good reason for its strategic plan: “Dunkin’ Brands and our senior leadership team communicate broadly and directly with our entire Dunkin’ Donuts franchisee system about all of our strategic partnerships, which are designed to build out the Dunkin’ Donuts brand for the long-term.

We do extensive due diligence on all strategic partnerships to ensure that our alliances with these world-class companies strengthen the Dunkin’ Donuts brand for the benefit of all, including franchisees. These partnerships are part of our brand seeding strategy to be the national leader in the coffee category. The common thread in all of these partnerships is to fortify our position within an extremely competitive marketplace by not conceding any of the playing field to entrenched national competitors.

Our goal is to increase franchisee profitability by responding to ‘on-the-move’ consumers’ desire for their brand of coffee wherever they go, and we’re confident that these partnerships will achieve this goal—quite simply, if our franchisees do not do well, then we do not do well.”

--

Related readings:

No votes yet

Tags:

There are no tags.

A useful history lesson

Those of us who have been around a long time have seen this very same scenario played out in many businesses. It happened in Haagen Daz ice cream; in Hickory Farms specialty foods; just a couple of examples. If it isn't putting single distribution channel products into other brick and mortar stores, it's selling them on the Internet. Either way, it's the same scenario.

There has also been a great deal of litigation over this. In almost every instance, the franchisor prevailed. I'm sure that DD's lawyers are familiar with the litigation history.

This is always where the franchisors go when the new franchise sales revenue stream dries up. Something has to replace that revenue stream. Alternative distribution is usually the direction of choice.

History also tells us that alternative distribution will shrink the franchisee population. Nothing goes on forever, and life cycle dynamics always result in finding ways to milk the brand once it has become old and its growth stage is over. Milking this brand has now begun.--

Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School

Krispy Kreme hung itself the same way

KK used to be a thriving business until franchisor greed put a gunn in its mouth. It used to be special, until you could buy KK donuts at eery greasy gas station and any old convenience store or market you could spit at.

Copying the mistakes of others seems, well, delusional.

Dunkin's Systemic Problem

It seems to me that this type of unilateral decision making on the part of Dunkin' goes beyond lack of communication. 

Dunkin's recent business practices are symptomatic of a growing problem that permeates this system - Dunkin's "shoot first and ask questions later" mentality in dealing with its franchisees.

In fact, it is this mind-set that is the driving force behind the incursion of termination law suits that Dunkin' has insituted against its franchisees.

WHAT IS CORPORATE COMMUNICATION ?

IF YOU ARE A DUNKIN FRANCHISEE, CORPORATE COMMUNICATION IS LISTENING TO CONCEPTS ALREADY DECIDED USING YOUR MONEY. IT BECOMES AN EASY DECISION, WHEN CORPORATE HAS AN OPEN WALLET OF FRANCHISEES TO "TEST " THEIR CONCEPTS WITH. THE ADD SALT TO THE WOUNDS, DURING THESE "SELL IN MEETINGS " THE PROPAGANDER AND PROMISES OF UNTOLD WEALTH WITH COMMITMENT ARE LUDICROUS. UTILIZING A FRANCHISE AGREEMENT TO LIE AND DECEIVE WITH NO BOUNDARIES SHOULD BE ILLEGAL AND SHOLD FALL UNDER MINORITY SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS.

Wasn't it the franchisees who

sold all them thar doughnuts to all them thar supermarkets, gas stations/ shoe shine parlours and brothels?

Didn't they think they were getting incremental sales they probably wouldn't have attained by doing that?

Am I incorrect about this?--

Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School

Consumer Experience at a KK Franchise Is Special

The cold, glazed Krispy Kreme donuts you buy in the Supermarket hardly make the hot donuts that roll down the conveyor belt at a Krispy Kreme franchise less special.

Using another distribution for a lesser product is not KK's franchising problem.

Isn't using such alternate distribution techniques essential in any marketing efforts to build the brand -- coffee, donuts, etc. -- that bring more customers into the stores? Any marketers out there who want to chime in?

it is not just zors

For what it is worth, this goes on in non-franchise corporate America all the time.  Examine a company like IBM for example, it acquires several companies a year, and usually they acquire a competitor or a company that has a technology they want but don't want to develop but includes a bunch of other products that compete with them in the market place.  Effectively they end up with a branded suite of products with large areas of overlap that compete with one another, perform the same functions, maybe using different or the same technology.  This leaves the customers confused and their salesmen gaping at the mouth.

My point is, it is not just zors that do it.  Large conglomerates poach their own sale also. 

FuwaFuwaUsagi

"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers."

And Richard...this is now quietly becoming Quiznoose's....

Richard,
Couldn't have agreed with you more. FYI now Quiznoose is starting to do the same thing with their cooler/kiosk programs. Some of these are actually being done at the ZOR level and not the Zee level. I have to agree that it's because of rapid closures of brick and mortar Q's and the Zee population is shrinking. I've said this a while back...it is my belief that that is their strategy. Let the weak (financially) Zees die off, resell at lower entry costs and now start distributing through alternative channels on a corporate level.

"Don't get into bed with the Sandwich Devil"

We intend to write our own history...

While your history lesson is both accurate and appreciated, the DDIFO intends to write its own history by actively speaking out in order to influence our future. As to your comment that "Milking this brand has now begun", if you will permit me the poetic licence, may I suggest that private equity's current monopolistic suction on the "teat" should be released so all who need and deserve nourishment may enjoy the benefits thereof. Moreover, I maintain that there is more than enough milk for all if we all relearn how to share properly. It is all about fairness, don't you think?

 DD Independent Franchise Owners, Inc.

Mark A. Dubinsky, President

www.ddifo.org

Hanged, sir

You can hang yourself. You can't hung yourself. Being hung is genetic, not judgmental.--

Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School

The "E" word

The short answer to Frankman is "maybe." This argument is most persuasively made by David Kaufmann, whose position we partially agreed with in Beguiling Heresy (pp. 181-198).

However, this can also be used both as a type of encroachment, and can damage perception of the value created by the (franchised) in-store experience. So while I personally agree with Frankman's view on the in-store Krispy Kreme experience, most people disagreed with that position, and KK brand image suffered commensurately.

Maybe so

They had to compensate for overbuilding and encroaching of other shops. Even on that basis it is a raw deal for Dunkin' DOnuts franchisees because they won't be selling the doughnuts to Hess. Hess buys them frozen from corporate. They aren't even made by Dunkin' franchisees.

Nice, huh?

Alternate distribution HELPED Krispy Kreme?

Helped them do what, close all of their big expensive shops in New England and many in every other US market?

Theories are one thing, but the cold hard fact of a shuttered shop is a difficult one to ignore when spinning a theory.

Maybe selling coffee in markets where you don't pass 5 shops on the way in and out is an excellent brand building idea, but self serve in a cut rate gas station seems wrong.

Different

That's moving money from your left pocket to your right pocket, not moving MY money from my wallet to YOUR pocket.

supermarkets, gas stations/ shoe shine parlours and brothels???

Your point is well taken, Richard, although I assure you I cannot personally attest to the brothel part. LOL. 

That being said, one should understand that the aforementioned franchisee actions that ultimately accelerated their demise were not without franchisor consent, if not explicit direction. At the end of the day, is not the franchisor largely responsible for stewardship and strategic direction?

DD Independent Franchise Owners, Inc.
Mark A. Dubinsky, President                                      www.ddifo.org

What Did Brown Do To You?

And UPS is a perfect example of how franchisees get the shaft with "overlapping services".

Is Stupid a Put Down?

Fuwa,

I was wondering if you could expand a bit on your tag-on? Are you meaning to differentiate on a person's abilities alone or on their worth as a person?

Can you see that this word (stupid) could be seen just as offensive to some as is the thinking "she was asking for it" is insulting to all women?

Please explain how your end justifies, the perhaps demeaning, means.

Mr. Les Stewart MBA

Sentenced to Hang

Were you sentenced to be hanged when you hung your hopes on the promises of a ZOR thief? ---who then left you hanging?

Everyone has a natural

and perfectly lawful monopoly over his own brand/product sold under that brand.

Calling something monopoliistic does not by itself connote anything inappropriate.

I have yet to meet anyone who thought monopolies were bad, except in the case of a monopoly owned by someone else.

--

Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School

Dream Dinners & Super Suppers

This Meal Assembly business is doing the same thing as Zors.

When Fuwa says studip people in large crowds, I think he might be meaning stupid people buying into Stupid Franchise's

they are called testicles...grow some

Les Stewart writes: 

Please explain how your end justifies, the perhaps demeaning, means. 

My reply: 

I was going to actually respond with something of substance until I read this tripe of yours.  I could not give a flying fox if I offend your or anyone else's femmy little sensibilities.  Grow a pair and deal with life.

FuwaFuwaUsagi

Example of Fuwa's Tag

Don't know if this is what Fuwa meant, but I understand the phrase to refer to something like how a majority of "users" picked windows 95 over IBM's OS.

Brian Arthur wrote about this type of bandwagon effect.

You could look it up. 

Michael Webster PhD LLB
Franchise News

Shocking smugness and arrogance from an offender!

Who thinks he is the only one in the world with the balls and the smarts to be crude and rude to those he puts in the category of "stupid people in large numbers."

His passion for money is apparent. His lack of compassion is obvious, and this is what Les Stewart was trying to bring to our attention.

Fuwa's Tag

I am not sure that this is what Fuwa means, because I havent' talked with him about it, but I read his tagline as meaning something like this:

How come windows 95 was chosen in the marketplace over a superior system like IBM's OS?Well,  "Never underestimate ..."

Brian Arthur wrote about such bandwagon or technological lock in effects.

You could look it up. 

Michael Webster PhD LLB
Franchise News

Dream Dinners, Supper Supers, & Supper Thyme

I think Fuwa & the above guest are correct. But it's not necessarily stupid people just caring people who were duped by some very persuasive people selling a dream. A pipe dream I mean!
Meal Assembly Kitchens are a FAILED FRANCHISE CONCEPT. When Zors started selling franchises before they even had road tested the "dandy idea" to folks who had the best intentions of helping busy moms put dinner on the table for their families. It was an emotional sale alright, but the sales pitch was directed at the franchisees, not the prospective MAK customers.
A "dandy idea" does not a viable concept or model make.
The only ones who saw dollar signs were the Zors out there who thought they could make a fast and easy buck off the backs of hard working folks.

Basic thinking would keep you from buying this

Really. Before you buy into a business model you ought to be thinking how difficult it would be for the guy next door to simply do the same thing. What are the barriers to entry?

There aren't any. Why should I pay for this? If it is new, there's no goodwill advatage.

In fact, any supermarket can and does do it a LOT cheaper than you can. Even a restaurant can simply add a delivery service or reduced price takeout and they've already beat you. If you are asked to pay for the right to sell something that you did last night a potential customer for the same money you want to make, that ought to stick out in your mind.

Was the Zor jut as thoughtless? I think not.

If you want your ticket punched with compassion,

go see a bloody priest. The problems that we are all trying to deal with is that people are getting robbed blind. In order to try to educate people to these risks, straight and blunt talk about business risks that are utterly unforgiving is what is called for.

If you want your brow cooled, go see a priest.--

Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School

...

I bet I get you femmy types so mad you just dust up a storm.

FuwaFuwaUsagi

I think you are Right! Dream Dinners and Supper Supers!

You are right on point. It was a dandy idea that appealed to the better instincts of good people who had the best intentions of helping busy Moms put dinner on the table for their families, and of helping themselves with a good job that involved "doing good"!

As I've said before, the ZORS would prefer that everyone make money with the concepts that they franchise but it is their "venture" that the franchisee finances for them and sometimes they walk away with the "fast and easy buck off the backs of hard working folks."

Compassion and Robbing Blind

Uh, aren't we supposed to be compassionate to those who were robbed blind?

Presumably they are past the point of being able to profit from blunt talk. 

Michael Webster PhD LLB
Franchise News

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
    Syndicate content