Judge Rules Quiznos Case Cannot Be Dismissed
NJ Suit Claimed Quiznos Took $75 Million in Franchise Fees Providing Nothing in Return
DENVER (Blue MauMau) - In a decision handed down just hours ago, Judge Wiley Y. Daniel, U.S. District Court in Colorado, ordered that Quiznos' entire Motion to Dismiss in the Raymond Bonanno, et al. v. The Quiznos Franchise Company, LLC, et al. class action lawsuit must be denied. The original action filed in New Jersey claimed Quiznos collected approximately $75 million in franchise fees while providing nothing in return for the 3,000-plus franchisees. Judge Daniel's decision states, "Plaintiffs allege that this "scheme goes all the way to the top of the organization." And he said, in the Amended Complaint, filed August 27, 2007, franchisees stated, "Defendant Rick Schaden, when recently asked about the problem of repeated sales of the same unit in Phoenix, Arizona, stated words to the effect, sell the area again.'"
In giving further information in the case, the judge also divulges that franchisees allege that this deceptive conduct "has been institutionalized by Quiznos and has become a part of the way it does business, to the detriment of thousands of hapless franchisees around the United States."
Franchisee attorney Justin Klein, Marks & Klein, said they feel this is the correct decision. He said, "Quiznos has publicly tried to discredit a lot of the claims that the franchisees have filed against them, and this shows that that is not the case. We are going to continue to vigorously pursue these claims." When asked what this means to the other lawsuits filed, Klein said, "Every judge is different. We will continue to pursue those as well."
Background of the Case
The original lawsuit filed in New Jersey State Court on February 16, 2006, asserted eight claims for relief: two were based on fraud under Colorado Consumer Protection Act, and the other claim asserts common law fraud stemming from Quiznos' fraudulent inducement of the franchise agreement. Others claims include breach of contract and of covenant of good faith and fair dealing. In March, 2006, Quiznos removed the case and sent it to the district court on the basis of federal diversity jurisdiction, under the Class Action Fairness Act. On November 17, 2006, Judge Cavanaugh denied Quiznos' motion to dismiss and transferred it to the Colorado district court pursuant to the forum selection clauses in the franchise agreement.
Judge Daniel explains what he based his decision on in denying Quiznos' Motion to Dismiss, stating a new Supreme Court decision. He also gives his analysis of each of the claims made in the franchisees Complaint, and addresses each of Quiznos' issues in its motion. Under one, stating whether the Schadens should be dismissed, Judge Daniel explains that Quiznos points to a provision in the franchise agreement that franchisees will not make claims against any individual employees and agents of Quiznos. But the judge rules, "Again, this argument involves the issue of whether the franchise agreement is unconscionable. Therefore, based on my previous analysis, Defendants' [Quiznos Franchise Company] request is denied.
A Quiznos spokesperson stated, "This case was filed on behalf of Quiznos franchisees who agreed to open a store but have failed to do so. Today, the court did not rule on the merits. It simply said that that plaintiffs’ complaint, as pleaded, is sufficient to survive a preliminary motion to dismiss. When the court considers the merits, Quiznos is confident that it will prevail."
--
Related Articles:
- Class Action Alleges 3000 Quiznos Sold but Not Opened
- Judge Dismisses Federal Lawsuit against Quiznos
- Quiznos Operators File Class Action in Wisconsin State Court
- Quiznos' Chief Counsel Speaks Out on Issues
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| Bonanno Order.pdf | 53.63 KB |













They're Coming For YOU Q
It looks like big (p)Rick and Dick have been caught in the cookie jar...errrr, caught with their hands on their cookie jar or something like that.
Similar case was settled in Canada
...... and this one will too, in the favor of the victims. No doubt about it.
And perhaps testimony under oath will reveal more ills perpetrated by the Shady's.
It is getting hot in the kitchen, and they will burn !!!
Where's the beef?
I think Quiznos is crap, but I am wondering, where's the beef? For the franchisees to prevail, they must surely reveal what it is that "if only then knew" they would not have invested their money. I haven't read what that is. Have you? Their claim cannot (surely) be that they were charged a franchise fee and go nothing in return.
Quiznos fraud
As a "potential" franchisee I can attest to the fraud. When I signed up for two franchises, and handed over my check, all support from Quiznos stopped. it took me over a month just to get the real estate rep to talk to me. he then turned me over to a realtor located some 80 miles away. They never looked into any of the properties i asked them to look at (mainly because I knew the rental costs and these folks work on commission). when they offered no support I wrote to Quiznos asking out of the deal. then I finally here from my two real estate jokers who tell me they are not obligated to follow up with me on any properties they feel are not suited to Quiznos. They also tell me they will stay in closer touch. Never heard from either one again. Long story short, Quiznos took my licenses away (to be sold again) on the basis that i did not develop a store in 12 months. They use the legal system to their advantage, knowing it would cost me a great deal more to fight them.
I entered into this business agreement with good faith and made the mistake of thinking Quiznos was going to deal with me in the same manner. I tried doing my homework and checked online but at the time i signed up most of these lawsuits and problems with Quiznos had not yet made the search engines. This is as close to Ponzi scheme as anything I have ever seen.
First Heard It Here
Dear Community:
This is a nice piece of reporting by correspondent Janet Sparks. I noticed this morning that a few other news journals are now beginning to pick up on this story today (Friday). Now that it is being reported, the blog sites may soon follow up with comments.
Hey Q - It's Not The Lawyers Suing You, It's Your FRANCHISEES
Well, another week another voice mail railing against the attorneys heading our class action lawsuits against the scum that is Quiznos. Hey Brennenman and the rest of the second stringers running Q - I've got news for you. It's not the lawyers suing you, it's your FRANCHISEES suing you. Franchisees tired of the lies, tired of being sucked dry by a rogue franchisor that has learned there is more money to be made stealing from franchisees than selling food to the public. The number of operating Quiznos is dropping and the word is out. Quiznos is a bad investment - a loser for anyone looking to MAKE money. Time for you rats to hit the lifeboats before we get to discovery and the light of truth shines brightly on the cesspool that (p)Rick and Lil Dick Schaden have created.
Running out of places to hide
There is still a long way to go to prove the deceit and unethical behavior of the Shadden's and cohorts...but it's a start
It is a matter of time
Justice will prevail. Bad guys always get in the end.
We have plenty of beef!!!
And Q knows it! This whole chain arose out of fraud of the shareholders and various forms of fraud continues to this day. All that you have to do is "follow the money", see who got rich and who didn't. and that is exactly what we will do. See you in court! Finally!!!
When Losing $25,000 Makes You One of the Lucky Ones
Be thankful all they took was your $25,000 franchise fee. You could've openned a Quiznos and watched your hard earned saving drained off by (p)Rick and (lil)Dick Schaden to the tune of $300,000. Look at it as a year of college - expensive but (hopefully) a learning experience that will keep you out of trouble in the future.
I can understand how you feel
How can so many people be complaining about the same thing and it not be the truth. People have lost their security they build up through many years of hard work. I was from another scam of the Scadens. And all everyone can throw in our face is due diligence and the UFOC which was created to protect them from all their lies. I am hoping the laws will be changed to protect the zees. These scams have to stop not only with Quiznos but all the bad zors out there. People need to stand up tell their stories so many will not buy these scams. Remember you have to think like a crook to be a crook. Most decent, honorable people would never even think the way the Scaden's think. Hopefully an honorable judge and jury will see the scam and give the Scaden's what they deserve. And the zees will get justice which they deserve. I believe due diligence should be disclosed to the buyer in what it involves. Like I said the average person doesn't even know there are franchise lawyers. Maybe there should be a school for people. reguired to go to understand exactly what the zees need to do before they decide to sign. It is my understanding many in our zee didn't understand what due diligence was. All us zees and former zees get called names like stupid, idiots etc. etc. We are not stupid, just uninformed hard working people. We need more disclosures on what we need to do. If they get informed and still sign then it would be the zee's fault. Honest people also don't misrepresent material facts. So who is really at fault?.Of course many of you here would just claim we are lazy. That my friends is the most stupid comment I ever heard.
Exposing Q
Get (p)Rick and Dick Schaden on the record, under oath. That's all I ask. Once the Pandora's box is openned and the Schaden's are exposed for the lying, thieving scum that they are their ill-gotten fortune will disappear and the only sub sandwich they'll see is on Prison TV.
Dream on
You will never collect a dime personally from the Schadens. More than enough funds were set aside a long time ago to resolve these issues. You don't realize that they are the house and you are just playing the game according to their rules. Good luck
We don't have that much time!
I agree that we will all be judged in the end, but I wouldn't hold my breath to see him pay while down here on earth.
I am for people making money
but not at the expense of the hard working people of our country. A fanchise system should be a win, win, win situation. Not a win, loose, loose deal. (Zor, Zee, consumer.) So far the only one who wins is the zor.
You are delusional
While I 100% agree with your opinion of Quiznos you are delusional if you think that just because they made a lot of money that they did something illegal. You gave them the right to do those things, and even paid for the privilege. They were all stipulated and clearly called out in the franchise agreement. Your arguement is purely an emotional one, as was your decision to purchase the Quiznos in the first place. Good luck.
Running out of places to hide
t
They have many places to hide
Behind their power and wealth. The hope is the many stories who had wealth and still ended in prison. It very well be a civil case but possibly more serious charges can be exposed in this trial. Remember Enron?
Puhleeeeeze!
There are so many lawsuits, pending for so long.
The Shadens and their ilk have long since taken asset protection steps to place their resources out of reach in case there should be any personal liability.
There is not, to our knowledge, any criminal action pending against them. They aint goin to gaol.
They're laughing their asses off at all of us.--
Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com, has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
There is justice
In my life time I have seen very successful companies flourish to end up bankrupt. I have seen a CEO end up pumping gas in his 50's and divorced after he lost his fortune. You don't think it could happen to the Shaden's? I understand they are both in divorce court now. Can they loose everything? If every zee stood up it could happen. Now I know there must be zee's who are successful. Most likely they are in with coporate. Just remember they are in the business of selling franchises not seeing zees be successful. As far as that 50 year old CEO he is now living with his mother. You never know how life will turn.
If zee's don't speak up nothing will change.
Worst case scenario
Learn from the Schadens. Most zees go into business not having a legal fund to go to court. I believe they do have funds set aside to pay for legal fees. I do not understand their logic at all. If they cared about their company they would help the struggling zees instead of paying lawyers. They would be loved by their zees instead of hated. It's more like King Zor and the peasents. It's a war and not a company that works with their people. Rob from people who have something to add to their extreme wealth. Making well to do people poor. So sad. It will catch up with them.
Do you honestly think
If people understood everything they would have not gone into this venture. In many contracts there are many words the average person doesn't understand. (Or Acronmyns.) Yes a franchise lawyer should be able to explain the UFOC. I never bought a Quiznos but an offspring of the same people. In fact our UFOC still had Quiznos all over it in which at training we laughed at. A sales person isn't always honest. And the corporation isn't honest. The law of common sense is misrepresentation of any kind is against the law. Finally an honorable judge that sees the UFOC is not right. That is why the Quiznos people got their day in court. One sided UFOC should be thrown out. Lying in business is against the law. And it is the lies that ruin people financially. People do not trust franchises until they prove them to be trust worthy. Verify their lies. The corporation should be responsible for their misrepresentations. Like most other business transactions are responsible for theirs. There is a reason they have people waive their court right for arbitration. They have something to hide. And just maybe a jury of everyday people will or could identify with the zees. I really hope so.
current Quiznos owners
Hello Richard,
I read your article and your background, and I respect your accomplishments and insights. Can you give us 3 Quiznos Franchisee who about to go bankrupcy after so many years of trying to hold on to our stores. Any option?
I can I rescind my contract with Q and operate my own sandwich shop without violating the Franchise Agreements? Thank you for anyone who can answer this question.
But Richard
It may take time. But if the Q people have their day in court and all the stories are consistant what do you think? Just for the judge to say the franchise agreement is unconsiousable means it is not right. Because they put the zee's aren't allowed to cry fowl when something is not right is a sure indication that something is wrong. I'm hoping this is going to be a break through for all the ripped off zees. This is hope for my zee because we share the same franchise agreement. I heard from another franchise lawyer there is ways around to get to their assets. In a case of fraud isn't that a way to get to their personel assets? It is a start don't you think so?
This isn't their first rodeo
Mr Soloman is on the money!
A few things to remember:
1. Quiznos has already settled many of these cases, and has set aside more than enough cash to cover these costs. They have unlimited time and resources on their hands, and they will use both to their benefit. The actual cost of the Canadian decision was small dollars to Quiznos in the big picture. I believe that the franchisees were paid back their initial fee and little else. Not much of a victory and it has no bearing in the U.S.. Quiznos is laughing all the way to the bank in Canada.
2. Read your franchise agreement! Quiznos UFOC explicity states that they will NOT help you find a site for your business, and that you are soley responsible to do this on your own. Any support they provided in this area was at their discretion based on the franchise contract you signed. In court they will simply show that even though they were not required to do so they made every effort to help franchise owners get open. They do not control the availability of retail space in any given market, and they make no promise as to when your business will open.
3. All of the other allegations made against Quiznos are clearly covered in the franchise agreement. They tell you up front that they are going to mark up products and services with no limits. They easily cover the actual cost to open a store in their estimates table. Once again read the franchise agreement you signed. You gave them permission to do all of these things when you signed the contract and you paid them for the privilege.
4. Rick, Dick and the majority equity owners have already made and will continue to make make billions. The senior managers and shareholders have already made and will continue to make millions. Most franchise owners caught up in these suits will make little to nothing, and will have spent all of their time and energy pursuing the "justice" they seek.
5. Life is not fair. It is a very sad fact that very few, if any, franchisees will ever be made whole by QUIZNOS. Accept this reality and get on with enjoying your life and building your future. No attorney or judge can change the past. Remember, you agreed to all of these things in writting, in advance. Live and learn. Maybe you will call a competent franchise attorney and actually listen to their advice next time, ( this is not a plug for franchise attorney's, just common business sense 101).
By the way I have personally made and lost more money with Quiznos over the years than any one else on this site. You can either face the facts or continue to pursue the pipe dream. The reason I won in the end is that I figured out how to use the experience and knowledge i gained to my benefit. While this may not be easy, no one is going to doo it for you, so you might as well get started.
Imagine that: There is a Shadowland
Do Diligence,
Live and learn, eh?
The dominant model is one business consuming the other since it one of the most efficient means possible (ie. the highest returns for the lowest costs).
Relative Return is what capitalism or "the markets" seek as a goal. Nothing else.
To have an unconditional love affair with a concept that is at its core a psychopath, (antisocial, callous, lying, shallow) strikes me as a little childlike.
Be careful which ideas you embrace or elevate to a near god level. They may turn out to be false. But these cautions are nothing new, are they?
The error is in the diefication and denial not in the investment.
Les Stewart MBA
Understanding Franchising
That's why franchising is STUPID
In the rare exceptions where the brand is so overwhelmingly strong and the business model so trasparently good, NEVER buy a franchise.
Most franchsors are crooks who want you to work like a dog while they take your money. The rip off contracts ven say this in it.
If you love the concept, take the idea and do it under your OWN name.
Current Q owner needs advice
Hello There,
I am a current Q owner, trying to hold on to my last breath with my store. Please give me some advice on how you made it work for you and for me too. Thank you from fellow Q owner.
Surviving a Vortex
Everyone does these steps. You do the interior work voluntarily [help of family and friends ] or you deny it [alone]. Your choice, sport.
Pain is inevitable but most suffering is optional.
Huh? Ask an older male relative or most women to explain it to you. Or not.
whatever...
Les Stewart MBA
Understanding Franchising
Practical advice
You gotta love Les for his practical advice.
Put these concepts into your exit strategy - vortex, maelstrom, "pain is inevitible but suffering is optional", and "the merry fishermen of Lofoden". This is the kind of advice that should be bottled.
Struggling Quiznos Owner
If you have a struggling Quiznos, you are in a world of hurt right now. If you have not signed up for delivery, then your biggest competitor is the Quiznos down the street who is delivering to your customers in your back yard. If you have signed up for delivery, your biggest concern is the driver, up-front costs, and on-going fees. Also Dominos Pizza just announced their sandwich delivery program. Hell, they already have the drivers, why not whoop up some sandwiches and put them on the menu.
Quiznos has placed the franchise community in a dangerous box of "your dammed if you do and dammed if you don't. My advice is to contact an attorney and explore your options.
Quiznos New CEO Announced
Looks like Quiznos has a new CEO now David Deno will be running the show.
They would have to be very stupid for you to be able
to get to their personal assets.
They may have personal liability, but collecting money is another picture altogether.--
Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com, has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
Winning with Q
Guest writes: "By the way I have personally made and lost more money with Quiznos over the years than any one else on this site.
You can either face the facts or continue to pursue the pipe dream.
The reason I won in the end is that I figured out how to use the experience and knowledge i gained to my benefit."
Can we assume that this was a business win and not a litigation win?
Michael Webster PhD LLB
Franchise News
There is such a thing
as a cowboys last rodeo. It will take the right judge and right jury and the right lawyer that will be the bull who will crush their head.
We'll just have to wait
and see what happens. Isn't fraud if proved, mean jail time?,
Yes, you can make that assumption
I have known a few people to receive a settlement because Quiznos did not fulfill their contractual obligations and knew so. I am not one of them. I have been in numerouse disputes with them but was always able to settle prior to taking legal action.
perhaps you would be kind enough to expand...
Richard writes:
They would have to be very stupid for you to be able
My reply:
Given your proclivity for disseminating useful information, it would be instructive and beneficial for those whom believe the Government or litigation can compensate for all wrongs, if you would list some of the methods by which the owners of a franchise can insulate their personal assets from the reach of creditors.
Sometimes I think people do not realize how hollow a victory in court can be.
FuwaFuwaUsagi
Smart Guest
Guest writes: "I have been in numerouse disputes with them but was always able to settle prior to taking legal action"
Maybe you should be teaching dispute settlement.
Say the 20 step program.
Michael Webster PhD LLB
Franchise News
Unfortunately I'm not that smart
It has more to do with older versions of franchise agreements that were much looser and more heavily negotiated than the more recent iron clad versions signed by most owners. One upside to all of these legal disputes is that Quiznos can not possibly keep track of all of the language/provisions in agreements that were negotiated in the early days. The people that negotiated those deals on their behalf are long gone. Every once in a while they get caught short when they realize they have a lot of exposure. They then either pay to make it go away or go to arbitration. They have paid out a number of times on these deals. We never hear about these because of the confidentiality clauses they require and enforce upon settlement.
There are numerous ways by which
miscreants can remove their resources forn the reach of claimants.
Aside from placing them in certain offshore locations that don't recognize judgments of USA courts, there are various trusts and trust like methods of placing wealth in the hands of those who are not answerable for your sins.
The important thing is that you have to do it beforre you are actually insolvent, and the removal transactions themselves cannot be the events that make you insolvent.
If you do it that way, the transfers are deemed not to be in defraud of creditors.--
Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com, has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
outstanding
This UPS store franchisee says "congratulations. Go get those bastards!!!!
this is a civil case, not criminal.
no one is going to jail here.
NEXT UP
are the theives in brown. UPS will be in the same position in the near future with their franchisees! It's been long overdue to start taking down these corp scoundrels.
Heard of Ebbers? How about Kozlowski? Martha Stewart?
It is highly unlikely that anyone will go to jail in this case but you must consider the lengths and depths of lies that people will go in order to protect their personal gold - especially the most greedy and egotistical.
Remember that one of the big Wall St. investors who paid the Q founders serious dough could also cause a lot of pain if their investment tanks, exposure for them, or the financial information provided as part of their DD ends up fabricated. They'll turn on these Q guys in a New York minute. I've seen a venture capitalist scorn and it is not a pretty picture for those in the cross-hairs.
Wire fraud. RICO. Postal fraud. Bank fraud. Tax fraud, etc., etc.
Many of the asset protection schemes that Richard noted could backfire if not executed perfectly - and the perfect crime is rare.
I wouldn't be shocked to learn that attaching these Q names to these suits and discussing claims of "…the scheme going all the way to the top…" is part of the macro legal strategy to get these individuals to pressure the company to reach a settlement without allowing things to get deeper and deeper...or catch the eye of Wall St.
Watch - if things move forward and the Q IHC sees the writing on the wall against them, they'll be a quiet settlement and changes made to the Q UFOC regarding future deposits.
It is a big game of risk and exposure assessment fought with pressure points - and there are no guarantees and absolutes...so stop making absolute statements 'cause it makes ya look dumb or naive or both.
It all seems like a chapter out of lessons learned from Watergate. Hey, Quizno's zees can name a new sandwich "The Watergate"! Hey, can I copyright that? Let’s start a side-conversation for the “Watergate” sandwich ingredients.
First ingredient: chili-CON-carnage dressing
Don't forget Webster
Hubbell, the attorney general under the Clintstones, and Hillary's former law partner who worked with her on White Water and got caught billing for work not done - stealing from the thief. Now that's pure Arkansas there!
He was Java The Hut in "Star Wars" and didn't even need make up.
If you look at Chelsea Clinton and a picture of Webster Hubbell, you know who her real father is. Aint that poetic justice on Bill Clinton?
I think somebody oughta start a Clinton's BBQ. I've ridden through Arkansas on my motorcycle, and Arkansas BBQ is really great. You could get that Atlanta radio talk show host to be the celebrity front man and spokesperson - Red Neckerson (no joke here).
It would have to be pulled pork cause aint many folks in Arkansas have a lot of teeth - they think dental floss is for hanging Christmas ornaments. Suckin some great pork was one of the really fun White House games during those Clintstone years - can't you just visualize Monica Lewinsky suckin on some pork in the Clinton's BBQ adverts, and gettin the sauce on that pretty blue dress?
Why are we wastin time lamenting the awful tragediess of franchising's past and present, when we could be makin a go of Clinton's BBQ in this great election year - What a great source of free adverts!
The next real money losing phony franchise could be a cosmetic dentistry franchise in Arkansas. HEY! It couldn't be any worse than Soup Man or Dagwood Sandwiches. --
Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com, has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
Yes, I have...
and those were criminal charges in a criminal case brought up by Federal prosecutors. If, out of that civil case, new evidence is found of criminal misconduct, then the appropriate jurisdiction would begin building a case for criminal charges.
i'm not a lawyer, but i believe that's how it works dumb dumb.
A costly lesson:
Elizabeth
Mar 14, 2008 at 5:38 pm
A costly lesson
on Mar 14th, 2008 at 2:08 pm
Prospective Quiznos buyers please read this carefully. I have always prided myself in that fact that I try to make good decisions. Yet, the decision of my husband and myself to purchase a Quizno’s restaurant is one decision that has been anything but positive. Please take your time reading my story because it may help you to avoid making a terrible mistake. I am hoping that by sharing my experience the information may save your family, finances, sanity and future.
We transfered our Quiznos over 23 months ago. Our weekly labor ranges between 22% to 25% - the goal is 20%. Average food costs range between 30% to 33% the goal is 30%. Not only have we not made money, but we have lost over $45,000 in the last twelve months in addition to $34,000 during the first 11 months. Additionally, another Quiznos near my location is also showing similar dollar losses based upon information that the owner has shared. I realize that there are poor stores in the system. It is unrealistic to assume that every owner runs a great operation. However, our store has one of the highest customer approval ratings in the area. In addition, our location regularly appears on the top half of page two of the weekly blast fax. The blast fax is an intra-company sales reporting tool utilized by owners in order to compare their store statistics to a large grouping within a certain geographic region. It is of great concern that our business is making more than 2/3 of our geographic region and yet we are not even breaking even. One wonders how the stores that are producing less volume than ours manage to survive? The fact is that most do not for long. The owners eventually become disappointed with this company and are either forced to sell or walk away because they can not find a buyer. Despite working as an unpaid “volunteer” at our location for the past 22 months I have never sacrificed quality or service. We have never skimped on labor in order to squeeze more money out of the bottom line. Our store is meticulously clean and the employees are well trained. Yet, despite all of our efforts, we have lost a lot of money. Yes, we conduct local marketing weekly in addition to other strategies that the company suggests to increase revenue - but to no avail. There are a fortunate few that are doing well, however, this is a rare exception. I too have a friend that is profitable. Her location is in a busy commercial district with plenty of daytime professional traffic in addition to evening residents as well. She is one of the fortunate stores that appear regularly on the top of the first page of the blast fax. Yet, despite the fact that her store is one of the more frequented locations, she has remarked that because her business is one of the highest grossing stores in the region, she is frankly surprised that she is not making a greater profit. She, like I, works her business diligently both in front and behind the scenes. She is also one of the fortunate few.
In our case, the fact that the company put not one - but three - new Quiznos extremely close to our existing store has been but one of several factors for our lack of profit. Even our customers remark that they are surprised that the company places stores in such close proximity. Our restaurant, once grossed between $9,000 to $11,000 average per week before we bought it. The addition of the other stores dramatically cut into our customer base. Currently, a $9,000 week is the rare exception. After paying over $320,000 for this store, we expected to at least net $70,000 per year. We would settle for breaking even at this point. We still have customers that make the extra trip to patronize our store because we offer the best service and most pleasant environment of the other Quiznos in the immediate vicinity. Yet, that is not enough to help our bottom line.
We realized that we were not going to make money two months into our venture. We put our store on the market right away. Today, almost two years later, we have been forced due to financial constraints to give it away. Another owner has offered us $90,000 and we are finally getting out. He knows that he will make a profit because at $90,000 it is a positive net sum gain for him. A store can not even be constructed for $90,000. He has said that based upon our P&L and the price that he is paying, he will probably make about $30,000 - perhaps $35,000 per year at our location. The key to profitability according to our buyer, is owning several locations that can be purchased for very little and planning to make about $30 - $50K per location based upon the traffic flow of each individual store. The key is to pay as low as possible for a store in order to squeeze out a small profit from each location.
One might ask why do so many franchisees fail to make a profit and so few do?
The answers are:
1) The profitable stores are located in areas with significant traffic flow to offset the high costs associated with operating one of these stores.
2) Non profitable stores (poor operations excluded) have been canabalized by our very own franchisor. It is apparent that none of the company’s decision makers understand the franchisor’s own required reading of “Behind the Golden Arches, The Ray Croc Story”. If they understood the symbiotic relationship that exists between corporate and its franchisees, then they would realize that the franchisee is the life blood of the company and it is not in anyone’s best interest to undermine the very people that make the system operate.
3) A store’s location is not sufficient to produce the high traffic necessary to cover its numerous expenses.
4) In regard to expenses, the franchisor has a monopoly upon most services, food and equipment necessary for us to operate. There are simply too many hands in the till for profit to filter down to the bottom line - the franchisee. There is something very wrong when a person can go to their local Restaurant Depot and find the same exact product made by the same manufacturer, same weight and ingredients but pay half the price of the same item sold by our required distributor. Many of my fellow owners have found this to be true regarding food and equipment time and time again. Other franchises that have a “franchisee consortium” responsible for monitoring and regulating costs of the goods and services utilized by franchisees have not only a higher satisfaction rate but are profitable as well. - (Source QSR magazine.) Of course there are always problems even in the best of systems, yet the bottom line is profitability. No one buys a business because they “like” the product. Investors purchase businesses in order to make money. In addition, there is no transparency within the company despite the fact that our franchisee’s pay extremely high royalties. Where there are royalties there should be total transparency. These restaurants are a long shot in the very best case. Yes, there are those who will sing the praises of the franchisor, but the extreme and vast majority will say that it is simply not worth the time or investment.
5) The existing business model is fatally flawed and operates for the sole purpose of making money for corporate as well as their investors.
6) Many of us have paid too much for our stores.
7) The costs keep creeping back up from the reductions announced by last year’s new administration while the suggested retail prices have either fallen or remained the same.
Our broker has decided not to sell any future Quiznos until the company changes its entire business model. Ours will be the last that he will handle until the tide truly turns.
It has been predicted by the new administration that the future for Quiznos is “bright” and that eventually there will be more “positive” stories rather than negative ones such as ours. It is a known fact that there are at least 450 Quiznos for sale on a well known web based real estate site versus only 24 Subways. Why do you think that is the case? Stories just like ours have played out and are occurring every day. Of course, Subway has its share of difficulties as well, but one thing is undeniable, a Subway does not stay on the market very long before it sells, whereas it is almost impossible to sell a Quiznos - let alone give them away as lease assumption only. Someone must be making something worthwhile at our competitor’s stores otherwise they would not be in such high demand. It is widely viewed that the “happy” owners of the future will be the ones that are either the second or third generation franchisees. When those of us who have over paid and are not able to financially continue on at our Quizno’s “volunteer” jobs have either had enough and sold for pennies on the dollar or “gone dark” the next generation - the future “happy” ones - will take over what we have built with our blood, sweat, tears and cold hard cash.
So yes, the company is accurate on one point: There will eventually be many more positive stories about which the company will boast. Those stories will come from the new owners who have purchased the deal of a lifetime and will ultimately profit from our failed investments. At the price that most of us are either walking away from or giving them away for in order to extricate ourselves from this financial nightmare called Quiznos, the next owners will actually be able to make a living from one of these stores. It is called “churning” and I firmly believe that this is an integral strategy to the corporation’s plan to make their restaurants a worthwhile investment in the future. It is simply a matter of time before we all cry “uncle” and corporate knows it.
And yes, then the next generation will truly be “happy”. Please think carefully before you invest in ANY business. Perform due diligence, talk to other owners, read comments posted on the internet, read trade magazines - anything that will help you to make an informed and objective decision. I only wish that we had known about this web site as well as the many others that I have since found in our familie’s nightmare odessy. Perhaps things would be different and life would actually be “normal”. This was a very costly lesson. Our lives, my children's sense of security and future has been devastated by this experience. We are struggling just to survive at this point. I hope that you can learn from our mistake.