Home | MyMauMau: Log In / Register | Ask Franny
Log In / Register | Mar 18, 2010

IFA Study Shows Franchising Strong

imageWASHINGTON, D.C. (Blue MauMau) – A survey for the International Franchise Association concludes that franchises have outpaced the economy from 2001 to 2005 as a whole in terms of the rate of growth of jobs, payroll and output. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLC undertook the major survey (pdf, 180 pgs) on behalf of the IFA for the second time in a row, following the first for 2001. Their report, released two weeks ago, compares the 2001 survey to the latest data of 2005, breaking down the economic impact by state and congressional district (pdf, 400+ pgs).

John R. Reynolds, president of the IFA Educational Foundation, thinks such economic information by congressional district is essential to the organization. He declares, "It is very important for policy makers, the media and the financial community to understand the positive impacts that franchising has on the economy. More franchise businesses mean more jobs. More jobs mean stronger, healthier communities. We need public policies that encourage and support the growth of more franchise businesses."

In past years the U.S. census did not take account of whether an enterprise was a franchise or not. The IFA paid considerable sums to come up with the information. Such studies have probably helped convince the government of the importance of gathering information on franchises.

Ms. Francine Lafontaine, professor of business cconomics and public policy at the University of Michigan's Ross School of Business, thinks highly of such efforts by the IFA. "Kudos to the IFA to put its money where its mouth is. This study did not come cheap," she declares.

Research Findings '01-'05

  • 3.3% of all businesses in the United States were franchise enterprises
  • 909,253 U.S. franchise units in 2005, which included franchised units, franchisor corporate units, gas stations and dealerships
  • 140,000 new U.S. franchise establishments

The IFA in a press release proclaims how much of the economy is pushed by franchising. "The rate of growth in employment was three times higher for franchise businesses than for the economy as a whole," it proclaims. And the number of franchised establishments and the part they play in the economy is large. According to the study, franchised businesses operated 909,253 establishments in the United States in 2005, counting both establishments owned by franchisees and those owned by franchisors. That amounts to 3.3 percent of all business establishments in the United States.

Such claims have the franchise industry puffing with pride.

Number Problems

Although there is no doubt that franchising is doing well, some academicians and business leaders are taking a second look at the lofty claims. The Department of Commerce's Bureau of Economic Analysis shows jobs and payroll growing at similar growth rates that the IFA study shows for franchising. (see charts, franchise information provided by the PricewaterhouseCoopers study for the International Franchise Association and economic data by the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis).image

Professor Lafontaine observes, "Franchises are not growing more than the rest of the economy, and especially not as fabulously as the press releases would like us to believe. But it is still a healthy growth. Franchises are an important way to organize businesses in the retail and services sector. The growth in franchises shows that people are finding ways of making the format work well for franchisees and franchisors."

Franchises are an organizational form and that is why it is difficult to say that franchising or for that matter licensing specifically contributes so much to the economy.

The professor continues, "It gets me nervous when it is said that there is this much business because of franchises. In other words, there would still be restaurants out there if there was not franchising. It is not that franchising is creating all of this [economic activity]."

Suspiciously High Output Figures

imageMatthew Shay, president of the International Franchise Association, declares, "As a result of these spillover effects, the total impact of franchising was to provide 21 million jobs and $660.9 billion of payroll in 2005. Output produced because of franchised businesses grew to more than $2.3 trillion in 2005."

It is those large and quickly growing output numbers that look out of kilter to the direct numbers that are growing at about the same rate as the rest of the economy (see job and payroll charts). Those projections of what happens to the overall economy because of franchised businesses appear out of the norm compared to other measurements (see Growth Mismatch chart).

Professor Lafontaine observes, "The growth in output seems large relative to all the others. It would be surprising if franchised businesses were able to grow output that much above nominal GDP given the growth in all other measures is much more comparable."

But PricewaterhouseCoopers disagrees that this is so unusual. Drew Lyon, a principal at the accountancy firm and a PhD in economics from Princeton University, replies, "The reason why output in franchising is growing at 9 percent while the U.S. output grows at less than 6 percent is really a function of the specific sectors of the economy that franchising is located. During this period franchisors were located in the faster sectors of the economy."

No matter how watchers of the franchise industry quibble whether franchises are dramatically outpacing the economy or just keeping up with it, one should not miss that this huge sector at the very minimum is roughly keeping pace with the economy.

--

Related reading:

0
Your rating: None

39 Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
IFA Growth Statistics ignore franchisee failure by Guest
One's perspective when reading about growth of the economy and growth of franchising depends of course on one's point of view from where one is standing. Always, because franchising is researched only from the standpoint of the franchisor and his profits and his growth, the plight of franchisees who are merely resources for the franchisors is ignored and not statistically relevant. It frightens me when I read that franchising is increasing in our economy because I know that this means that increasing numbers of franchisees are being sacrificed to seed the industry and to provide for the visibility and viability of the franchisors. The statistician is so often just an artist who paints the picture for his patron to influence the viewers and the legislatures who then promote franchising as a means to solve the economic problems of the nation. While it may be true, as PricewaterhouseCoopers, Drew Lyon, indicates above, i.e. "The reason why output in franchising is growing at 9% while the output of the US grows at less than 6% is really a function of the specific sectors of the economy that franchising is located. During this period franchisors were located in the faster sectors of the economy" ---the faster sectors may be a result of overseeding and saturating these sectors through the use of the cheap labor and cheap venture capital of franchisees, who bear all of the risk of failure and who, even in failure, have fed the profits and growth of the franchisors. The nature of the BEAST of franchising is not revealed in these statistical studies. Does the end justify the means?
Franchise works well for Zees and Zors by Bob Frankman
Bob Frankman's picture
"The growth in franchises shows that people are finding ways of making the format work well for franchisees and franchisors." - Prof. Lafontaine Well said.
Methodology for Predicting 900,000 Franchises by Don Sniegowski
Don Sniegowski's picture
Here's a part of the interview with Drew Lyon of PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLC that does not show up in the news story. I think our readers will find the information interesting. Although the study and press releases say there were 909,253 in 2005, this number includes product distribution franchises - Coke bottlers, car dealers and gas stations. As far as business format franchises, the study estimates 773,436 establishments.
Don: How do you estimate that there are 909,253 establishments - product distribution franchises, gas stations, car dealers, franchisor corporate units and business format franchises - that work in a franchise network? Is this just a best, shoot-from-the-hip guess? Lyon: “There is no single source for that number that is directly available. But this is grounded in Dunn & Bradstreet data where they look at 13 million establishments. They have an indicator in their records if it is a franchise or not. But there is error. Sometimes chains that are known to be franchises are not indicated as franchises and vice-versa. We combine their data with a survey that the IFA conducts. The survey goes to the franchisor to collect information on how many franchisees that they have. This is an estimate but all the published IRS, Census BEA data is an estimate drawn from a sample. It is grounded in the Dunn & Bradstreet data. We don’t accept this as perfectly accurate. We can marry up a franchisor’s self-reported information with D&B reports the same franchisor has in their data set. Assuming the franchisor knows how many franchisees they have, we can improve on the D&B numbers getting a very good estimate of the proportion of business establishments that are franchised."
IFA Target Research by Guest
The IFA has been very successful in producing academic research that promotes franshising as the savior of the economy in terms of job numbers, etc.. and stimulation of the economy. However, the research almost always ignores the individual unit statistics concerning the first-owner franchisees, who, in research and reality, are no more than a resource upon which the franchisor grows his visibility, viability, and profits, in success, or break-even, or in failure of the first-owner franchisees. I am beginning to think that the binding and exploitive long-term franchise agreenments and NNN leases and the "securitization" of franchise agreements and leases are behind the constant building of new shopping Malls and new commercial construction because it is the small tenant business owner, independent or franchisee, who with his personal guarantees on the commercial lease and the franchise agreement, is standing at the bottom of the pyramid and providing resourses and profits for those above him in the pyramid. When this franchisee fails, it is only he who fails because of the personal guarantees and SBA guarantees, etc..or Home Equity collateral that holds up for the banks and lenders. In our area, all of the Inside Malls are failing; some of the outside strip Malls are 60% vacant; some of the new outside upscale Malls are only one-quarter occupied; and yet we are building even more shopping areas in this already congested area? What is going on? Who pays the bill for all of this? Who loses everything?
Re: IFA Study Shows Franchising Strong by Guest
Whether its buisness or bank everyone loses. And these bank people and others pay off their losses to the consumers. The saying that isn't trickles downhill is said for a reason. Everyone pays for it.
With all due respect to the prof by Howard R. Morrill
The growth in franchises shows that lots of people will buy them and that franchisors are able to sell a lot of them. That's all that data shows.
Misleading! This Quote on franchisees and franchisors. by Guest
Misleading because franchisors have been so successful in finding ways of making the format work for second and third generation franchisees who have reduced their risk and their overhead through the acquisition of the first-owner franchisee's business for almost nothing. Many of these second and third generation franchisees have reduced risk and reduced overhead that makes it possible for them to break even and in rare instances, to even earn profits. Let's be honest about this! When the franchisor earns royalties on the gross sales of the franchisee, and gross sales can be sustained and grown even when a certain percentage of first-owners fail, the first franchisee is really just a resource of the franchisor who is expendable in failure if the failed business goes on to serve the franchisor.
Great leaping lords of logic by Les Stewart
Les Stewart's picture
Bravo for Professor Lafontaine's transparency. Les Stewart MBA
Understanding Franchising

Les Stewart MBA FranchiseFool :: WikidFranchise

Ah, yes, Guest, you must be right, the BEAST by Guest
is at it again, they are conspirators, they are hunting for 1st generation franchisees so they can scorch 'em and steal from them, turn them into indentured servants and even slaves, yes indeed, you're on top of it, Guest, you know these things better than any of the experts or even those few -- what is it, maybe less than a dozen or so nationally -- franchisees who are making money. You know that increasing numbers of franchisees are being sacrificed, it's all against their will because these people have no brains, they have no idea how to ask questions and investigage, unless of course they can hire a high-powered attorney, and even then it won't work out for most of them will it, Guest, because these people, frankly, aren't very smart and they think franchising is a sure-fire path to fortune and when they find out, my God, that they've got to actually get out of bed in the morning, go to the store or the office or the field and do some w.o.r.k., good Lord that's asking far too much and it's a conspiracy because the franchisor just lied to them anyway, that franchisor BEAST told them they'd be millionaires just for buying the franchise and putting up a sign, and of course you know, Guest, that the franchisor does this just so he can trick these 1st generation franchisees, sorta like America tricked 1st generation Italians and Germans and Irish--you know it's probably all Lincoln's fault, don't you?--and then when these franchisees pay all, every penny, of their life savings to the frannchisor, then the franchisor takes them to court and bilks a few more dollars out of 'em, and then offers them up as a scarifice only to sell their stinkin' rotten location to a 2nd generation franchisee, or take it over themselves and turn it into a gold mine. But of course the franchisor BEAST or the 2nd or 3rd generation franchisee who succeeds cannot stay in bed and work from bed and bitch and moan and complain or come up with conspiracy notions because to succeed he has to work -- he missed the lies the franchisor told, or he just didn't listen, but again, in your mind, that's how the franchisor tricks people into succcess because, after all, if they don't have a success story now and then who in their right mind would buy a franchise? I realize there are people who would, there are people who do, they are mindless souls looking for a handout, expecting something for nothing. So you are right, the BEAST is alive and we need to run--maybe a socialist country is more appealing to you?--and protect ourselves. And by all means keep our pitifuls jobs so we can get a paycheck a couple of times a month, even though, Guest, you will tell us that every employer lies and misleads, even the corporate boss is a BEAST and life is just a daily grind.
Re: Franchise works well for Zees and Zors by FuwaFuwaUsagi
FuwaFuwaUsagi's picture
scrubbed by user

FuwaFuwaUsagi

"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers." 

Just wish by Barbara Jorgensen
Barbara Jorgensen's picture
We can hear true stories of zees working well with zors. They have to verify their stories for us to believe it. (Something I learned here.) Like in real estate the word is disclose, disclose, disclose. In the franchise world the word is verify, verify, verify.
It's the economy stupid by Guest
Everyone loses. Do you think that the banks, oil companies, etc won't pass off their losses to the consumer? The saying that sh*t trickles downhill is said for a reason. We all pay for it.
Re: Methodology for Predicting 900,000 Franchises by Guest
How can you tell if something is a franchise?
Is it possible that 1,2 & 3 generation zees all made $$$? by Guest
Is it possible that a number of 1,2 & 3 generation zees all made $$$? Heck there is a universe of more than 700,000 franchises.
Just because there is growth by Barbara Jorgensen
Barbara Jorgensen's picture
doesn't mean the zees are happy. We'll see in the future how many lawsuits will be a reality. Years ago we never would of dreamt there would be so many unhappy zees. I do wish for success for everyone. Yet if you continually talk to people in franchising and most seem unhappy then it isn't in our mind. Nothing would make me happier to really see how a good zor works. And see their zees are prospering. Then I would feel so sad because I would of wished I had met them first.
You must be a zor by Barbara Jorgensen
Barbara Jorgensen's picture
Because you are attacking us while we are trying to educate people of the dark side of franchising. First hand experience. How do you know we didn't work? You can tell your rosy painted pictures of the franchise world. But we speak the truth. Don't you have some work to do in your successful zee? Hop to it- you need to go back to work.
Ice Cream by Guest
If ice cream were really that great for the ice cream maker and the ice cream eater, it would have seen long-term growth.
Good one by Barbara Jorgensen
Barbara Jorgensen's picture
So funny!
It is Beastly Reading when there are no paragraphs! by Guest
I am sorry you are so distrubed by the truth as I see it. It is hard to know where you are coming from and I'm happy I have never been there! You have my best wishes for your speedy recovery! Carman
Why would they they? by Guest
Why would they when anyone that posts something that doesn't comdemn franchising gets jumped on by several people? And why would anyone want to disclose enough information so that you could "verify" their posts. I looked at 123 Fit and after a couple of hours I couldn't see how it would make any sense or cents.
Data by michael webster
michael webster's picture
Hmm, this is bright. 1. Show how much money their could be made in litigation if there was just a private cause of action for the Franchise Rule. 2. Next, show much money and jobs franchisees create as opposed to the lean franchisor structure - show that to politicians who seek votes. Just who runs the strategic thinking department over at the IFA? Daffy Duck?

Michael Webster PhD LLB
Franchise News


Michael Webster, a franchisee attorney in Toronto, Ontario, publishes a website on business opportunities and franchises called "The BizOp News"


Welcome Howard by michael webster
michael webster's picture
I thought I would welcome Howard R. Morrill to BMM. Here is his webpage.

Michael Webster PhD LLB
Franchise News


Michael Webster, a franchisee attorney in Toronto, Ontario, publishes a website on business opportunities and franchises called "The BizOp News"


Re: It's the economy stupid by Guest
The majority of businesses in America are owned by small, independent business men and women. Much of the economic problems that we currently have are related back to people wanting something for nothing... 1. No money down mortgages - because I don't have the money to buy a house with a conventional loan... 2. Interest only baloon loans - because I want a bigger house than I can afford... 3. Plasma TVs, vacations, etc - because they gave me a credit card, I should spend $1000s of dollars that I don't have... This is just people being irresponsible, and wanting someone to bail them out when it all comes due.
Bad Input, Bad Output But Best Guess by Bob Frankman
Bob Frankman's picture

The census asks the owner to select whether they are a franchise or not. But sometimes you don't know what you don't know.

The owner may hear a constant message from corporate that they are a license or a dealer, and so they may not think of themselves as a franchisee, even though they might be.

It's like asking a black man - are you black? If they say they are black, then the census and the statistics factors them as black.

It really depends what zor you by Barbara Jorgensen
Barbara Jorgensen's picture
are with. I can't talk about other franchisors. But it seems to be the rule in many systems. Some actually use real people to battle test a system to keep changing it until they get it right. Cost families ruined financially. Many factors are involved. If a first generation zee has low rent and no build out cost that will help. The three biggest cost is rent, equipment and build out cost. It also depends on the area your sight is. It is like real estate. If it is in a progressive area then of course rent will be more. It also depends what type of business it is. Carman and I had 2 different zees. She was in a UPS store, I was in the fitness business. We both lost the same amount of money. By the way Carman you said you were there 3 years? We didn't last a year. I don'tknow if Carman was blamed for her store closing. But in the words of my area director, "It is always the franchees fault." This is hogwash! Every situation is different. But when the stories are similar and consistant I have to believe it is the truth. If it never happened to you, then I am surprised. My observation in franchising is the people who are really in with the corporation tend to be called the most successful clubs. Yet I do not believe their progress reports. Because I know they misrepresented us in so many things. Anything is possible. I sure wish someone would share a great story of a first generation zee. In the Q model it seems when a zee reaches success, encroachment could be a reality. Maybe putting a company store right across the street or very close. Putting the first generation zee to go out of bussiness. So the first generation zee builds the brand, looses a good portion of their business than has to close. The company gets the store. Then there you have a store that is owned by company that is successful. I have read this type of story all over the internet. I believe this is the scheme of company's like Q and TDM. I also believe if you are building in a very progressive area the company may want your store. Like ours. We did the build out and paid for everything inside the business. (We're still paying for it.) I know of a first generation zee that was next to ours. She has a partnership in the zee. (TDM) They share in the cost. But they are there at least 80 hours a week. She seems reasonably successful. Yet she really wants to find someone to buy her store. She is not happy and we have talked many times. I wish successful first time zees would share their stories.
Thought we had honey but we got vinegar by Barbara Jorgensen
Barbara Jorgensen's picture
You catch more flys with honey than vinegar.
Carman you wouldn't recognize the truth... by Guest
if it was a giant puss-filled zit at the end ofyour nose.
Please give me your in put by Barbara Jorgensen
Barbara Jorgensen's picture
on 123 fit?
Do, I love it when you are sarcastic by Guest
it brings out the worst in you. Nope, I don't have to worry about getting back to work because I'm not a slave to my franchise. Franchisees who do their homework first, and then who follow the system, most often they profit from the experience. They avoid joining you on the dark side of franchising, but someone's gotta be there, Do, so you may as well. Keep educating people -- I haven't been on this site for long but I see that people tire of you quickly and easily. Not a good sign if you're really interested in teaching people -- they need to stick with you, believe in you, trust you, and get the sense that you've got integrity. You've only got one side to tell, it's the dark side, and many of us have been to the other side and we know the value of franchising.
Good point by Guest
Yes, most of America has de-evolved into a country of babies, only wanting and accepting instant gratification. But that doesn't mean we won't all pay for it in the end, unfortunately.
Banks and lenders have been irresponsible by Guest
Banks and lenders and brokers and credit card companies have been irresponsible in their constant search for the maximization of profits and for products to sell to investors. This bundling of mortgages and franchise contracts to provide paper for investors just got out of hand and it backfired and some of the biggest boys got caught with bundles of shit. If the Banks and Lenders and the Credit Card Companies and the Investment Companies, etc.. had done their due diligence, these consumers that you blame wouldn't have been able to get mortgages and credit cards with unrealistic creditr limits, etc.. But look who gets bailed out by the Federal Reserve with a free cash window, and in the end, it is the American people who will pay the price for the greed of American corporations.
Encroachment by Guest
One small problem with Q putting a company store down the road from you. They don't have any company stores (besides Denver Airport). If someone goes in close to you, usually it is another franchisee.
Now I know you must by Barbara Jorgensen
Barbara Jorgensen's picture
be the same age as my son. Are you in your twenties or teens? No one comes up with that unless they are going through that acne stage.
Oh how I wish I were a happy zee!!! by Barbara Jorgensen
Barbara Jorgensen's picture
Then I would tell everyone. But you lower yourself by attacking us. Just stick to your story and I will do what I have to save people from financial hell. If you tell the truth I would love to get know you better. Because I want everyone to be successful.
How do you know people tire of me? by Barbara Jorgensen
Barbara Jorgensen's picture
You love to blow smoke. I am telling the story of so many people in the real world of franchising. I will continue to post until Mr. Blue Maumau tells me other wise.
What do you mean... "we by Guest
What do you mean... "we won't all pay for it in the end, unfortunately" WE ARE ALL PAYING FOR IT RIGHT NOW!!!
Credit Card Fees by Guest
Credit card comapanies get a fee from the business, interest from us, and then their annual fees.
They don't? by Barbara Jorgensen
Barbara Jorgensen's picture
I have heard area directors opening stores near another store. Is it another zee like you or an area director. Are area directors taking over stores company or the area directors?
So they really do by Barbara Jorgensen
Barbara Jorgensen's picture
make most all their money on selling zees, right?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Notifications