Dunkin now lists as the First item on the criteria for new franchisees that the applicant have the intent and money to open 5 stores:
http://www.dunkinfranchising.com/aboutus/franchise/franchise-profile.html
![]() |
|
||
| Sep 5, 2008 | |||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dunkin' Donuts Mom and Pops Squeezed Out by Private Equity Firms
Submitted by Janet Sparks on Wed, 2008/04/30 - 19:04.
BROOKLYN (Blue MauMau) - A Jewish woman from Borough Park and her Muslim business partner, an immigrant from Egypt, are fighting for their livelihood after their two franchises were terminated by Dunkin' Donuts for minor infractions. According to co-owner Asam Habib, recently interviewed by the New York Post, "It's simple. We build up the businesses for them, then they cut us out so they can resell them." Last year when his partner Cindy Gluck approached Dunkin' about possibly selling 15 percent of her business to a store manager so he could share in their success, the franchisor responded with a lawsuit. Gluck said even though she had notified the company before consummating the transaction, they told her she had violated her contract. Although she immediately withdrew her preliminary offer to the employee, it was too late.
Dunkin' filed the complaint against her in the U.S. District Court of New York, Eastern Division. Habib and Gluck soon found themselves in the same situation as 157 other franchisees who have been sued by Dunkin' since 2006. According to court records, both of their franchises have been terminated and they are in settlement talks through her attorney David Jaroslawicz to avoid costly litigation. But Jaroslawicz feels this is Dunkin's way of consolidating its small franchises under a single, large, multi-unit franchise. He said Konstantino Skrivanos, better known as "The Greek," already owns a dozen Dunkin' Donuts locations in Brooklyn and more than 100 locations along the east coast. He said it was a "greed-driven process which threatens to eliminate the last vestiges of small business in the city's largest borough. Dunkin' Donuts had offered them a buyout of $400,000 for the two stores they opened - stores they could resell for $700,000 or $800,000 each, according to the New York Post article. And when the partners solicited offers elsewhere, Dunkin' Donuts nixed the deals - even though the potential buyers came from a corporate-approved list, Gluck said. Jaroslawicz said in an interview that they had also imposed a $100,000 penalty against her, but told her if she'd pay $75,000 of the penalty they would consider settlement. He said he had no idea what the penalty was for, that no one in the company could tell him, not even in questioning company officials under oath. He does know of another immigrant franchisee who was imposed with the same penalty. "These poor immigrants cannot afford to pay such amounts." But Jaroslawicz said there is a lot more to this story, something the media keep missing. "It's really all about Dunkin' being taken private by three major private equity companies, Bain Capital, The Carlyle Group and Thomas H. Lee Partners, back in March 2006. "What these firms are doing is what they do with all companies, like Burger King and Hertz. They take them private for $2 or $3 billion, or whatever. They do whatever they can to squeeze the last drop out of them in order to get the revenues up. Then they sell off 40 or 50 percent to the public so they can double their money. When they sell off the other 50 percent, as time goes on, they make billions of dollars." Last May, Dunkin' Chairman and CEO John Luther testified before the U.S. House Financial Services Committee, when it was conducting a hearing to examine the effect of private-equity financing on workers and firms. He spoke on the benefits of private equity for franchise systems, stating that the private-equity acquisition has "liberated" Dunkin' Brands. Jaroslawicz seems to agree. He feels the tactics of private equity companies are destroying the small mom and pop operators. "They have it down to a science. Unfortunately, Asam and Cindy got in as franchisees at the wrong time, right before the "hedge fund boys" (his term for the private equity firms) took over, Jaroslawicz said. "They have created a whole new set of serfs under the guise of owning your own business. They own you if you sign those papers." But Stephen Caldeira, Chief Global Communications & Public Affairs Officer, Dunkin' Brands, said in an interview, "We would never pursue legal action against any franchisee if there wasn't clear cause." He didn't know about penalties being imposed on franchisees regarding infractions, but he said that he would look into it. But he did add, "I think it is a private matter. This is still pending litigation so why would we comment on that?" In regards to Jaroslawicz's comments on taking stores away from poor immigrants, Caldeira said he didn't know where that information was coming from. "We have operators of all different sizes, all different backgrounds and we are very proud of the diversity of our franchise system." Although people are entitled to their opinions, he said all he could comment on were the facts. "We think the reason we have been around for 58 years and continue to grow is because we provide great opportunities for franchisees to provide for their families, to employ people and give back to their communities. Whoever is making these assertions, I don't know where they are getting their facts from." When the equity companies took over Dunkin' Brands, Jaroslawicz said he asked for their business plan and their exit strategy through the courts, although he knew what they were going to do. He said, "You don't have to be a genius to figure it out. I want to know their exit strategy because I know they are going to do an IPO for 20 or 40 percent of the shares. They are pushing the hell out of their people, mainly on the backs of the immigrants." In talking with Jaroslawicz this week, he said they just received the decision from the federal magistrate stating his request to receive the equity companies' business plan was denied. Jaroslawicz feels the things going on in the Dunkin' system are serious enough for the Attorney General's office to get involved. "They do have a franchise division. I think if enough media exposure takes place the AG's office will have to investigate and put an end to it." Related reading:
Dunkin requirementSubmitted by Guest on Sat, 2008/05/17 - 16:04.
Dunkin now lists as the First item on the criteria for new franchisees that the applicant have the intent and money to open 5 stores: http://www.dunkinfranchising.com/aboutus/franchise/franchise-profile.html Franchisee is "consumer"Submitted by Paul Steinberg on Fri, 2008/05/16 - 15:43.
One of the affirmative defenses raised by Mr. Jaroslawicz is pursuant to NY General Business Law 349, which is a consumer protection statute. This is the rare exception which proves the rule, and may not survive this case. It is true that appellate authority binding in Kings County (Brooklyn) holds that franchise agreements are covered by GBL 349 if they are part of a marketing scheme impacting "consumers at large" Akgul v. Prime Time Transp., Inc. (2 Dept. 2002) 293 A.D.2d 631, 741 N.Y.S.2d 553 In turn, Akgul cites to Connolly v. Wecare Distribs., 143 Misc.2d 637, 541 N.Y.S.2d 163, a 1989 case from a trial court in upstate NY. The rulings in these cases are deceptive, and this may have implications for the Dunkin' franchisees.
If Dunkin' doesn't get the GBL 349 claim dismissed at trial, I suspect that they will fight this all the way to the Court of Appeals. There are a lot of Dunkin' stores (and a lot of franchisees) in New York state, and I suspect that the IFA folks will be there with amicus briefs. If franchisees can fall within the purview of consumer protection statutes, that is good for them. But franchisees reading the pleadings in this case should not get the idea that this is the mainstream view, nor that the current case law will stand. Indeed, the Connolly court indicates why the "ignorant franchisee" defense normally does not succeed even with a sympathetic bench. Paul Steinberg Contrarian ViewSubmitted by michael webster on Wed, 2008/04/30 - 19:34.
Janet, let me take a really contrarian view here. Hedge funds are going to allow geographical diversification of franchise risk. As such, that is a good thing. The franchise concept is brilliant - a lean organization with owner/operators assuming and being rewarded for local risk. The franchise concept sucks - local owners are risk adverse having put all their eggs in one basket. Solution: the franchise system in which risk is spread around through the securitization of the franchise agreements. Michael Webster PhD LLB You gotta love it when...Submitted by RichardSolomon on Thu, 2008/05/01 - 08:15.
Da Greek is the mainstream guy that the hedge fund boys are promoting, while the Jews and Egyptians who do things that violate contracts without first vetting their deisions for compliance issues yell discrimination. Da Greek is my bet every time. He can read. Serves people right for trying to help some poor schnuck manager by jeopardizing their business obligations and the consequences of getting caught at doing that. What the hell? Is't only a contract, right? Who reads da fine print in contracts these days? Certainly not Cindy and Ahmed. Da Greek wins again. Smart Greek beats New York Lawyer oughta be a movie! Act One, Scene One - Jewish franchisee goes to remedial reading classes in the evening after losing her business because she thought her contracts didn't really apply to her - after all, for Gawd sake! Jon Luther has to go testify before a Congressional committee about the vicissitudes of being a Mom and Pop franchisee in a world full of Greeks and Phillistines. Luther thinks that Phillistines all come from Philadelphia, and a serious legislative debate ensues over jurisdictional issues. Meanwhile, Da Greek marries his daughter off to the son of Panos Karatossis from Atlanta - Luther's former home town - and pays for the wedding with the winfall profits of having just taken over Da Franchises of Da Jew and Da Egyptian. Senator Clintstone - from New York - goes off on a rant about how Luther beat her constituents out of a going business to favor Da Greeks from his old home town. Luther denies ever having known Da Greek - or any Greek for that matter, and a perjury indictment is issued because his grandchildren all have just one eyebrow that goes all the way across their faces. There is a recess while everyone eats doughnuts. Meanwhile Al Sharpton threatens to close down New Yawk because some hedge fund people are terminating minority franchisees just because they don't pay royalties. Sharpton wants failure to pay royalties while black to be exempt from franchise contract retaliation under the Civil Rights Act. He also wants a free 123 Fit franchise for his client, Tawana Brawley. Luther gives Clintstone a campaign contribution and the hearings are adjourned, sine die. He then goes back to squeezing Cindy Glick. Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com, has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School |
||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||