Bennigan's, Steak & Ale Go on the Chopping Block
The franchising arm of Bennigan's and Steak & Ale concepts was quick to announce today that franchise owners were independent companies and not part of the Chapter 7 filing. The 138 domestic and international franchisee-owned restaurants will remain open and fully operational.
The company announced that Bennigan's Franchising Company, L.P. and Steak & Ale Franchising Company, L.P. will continue to provide high quality support services to its franchisees and remain focused on maintaining and maximizing the value of the franchise brands for its franchisees and their loyal customers.
Bruce Shaeffer, an attorney specializing in tax and company valuation issues, emphasizes that Chapter 7 liquidates the company as opposed to Chapter 11 in which the management of a firm seeks protection from bankruptcy by the court. Shaeffer conjectures, "My guess is the Chapter 7 trustee will try to sell off assets including its trademarks and goodwill. My other guess is that the franchisees will find it in their best interest to buy the chain."
"This has happened before," agrees Craig Tractenberg, a partner with Nixon Peabody LLP who specializes in franchise mergers and acquisitions of distressed franchise systems. "My firm was counsel to franchisees who bought the operating assets out of the Ground Round bankruptcy. They cherry-picked the best corporate stores that were closed by Ground Round. That is one of many strategies that can be exercised [by the chain's franchisees]."
Ground Round Inc. is a casual dining chain founded by Howard Johnson's that nearly collapsed from an overextension of restaurant units and then was bought out by a group of franchisees joining together.
Technomic, consultants and analysts for the food industry, thinks the difficulties facing S & A Restaurant Corp. and many other casual dining chains have been apparent for some time.
Bennigan's and Steak & Ale have had lackluster menu concepts with little recent innovation. That helped exacerbate their problems wrestling with high food costs and a soft economy. Credit has also been tight.
Technomic thinks that Bennigan's may not be alone. The top 20 casual dining chains in the same category that Bennigan’s operated had unit growth of 45 percent during the most recent five-year period, well beyond the growth in demand. “These restaurants share many subtle and complex challenges that extend beyond this difficult economic climate,” says Ron Paul, president of Technomic. “To some extent, they’ve become victims of their own success—a mature category with too many units and not enough differentiation, at least in the eyes of consumers.”
Nonetheless, the consultancy feels that strong unit economics, excellent execution in food quality and service, and the ability to convey a strong price/value perception with consumers, regardless of the total amount spent is what makes some restaurants in the casual food sector stand out.
“In terms of achieving differentiation, it’s hard to underestimate the importance of the food element,” says Paul. “Consumers are naturally drawn to unique, signature menu items. When the chain can also layer in excitement through new or limited-time offerings, they help create an environment where consumers want to come back. A good experience can generate all-important buzz around the concept.”
Still, industry-watchers expect more restaurant chains to follow Bennigan's. The question is who.
Mr. Tractenberg hints that there may be more trouble to come but identifying who will be next is difficult. "I don't think anyone can identify a single restaurant brand any more than they can pick a single retailer who will go under. It's just a bad economy for retail."

Takes over Bennigan's franchise system.
The Truth Shall Set You Free!
TIF
The Truth Shall Set You Free!
TIF
Most of the time the print media does a good job on business stories, but sometimes franchise and bankruptcy stories are harder because the involvement of complex law.
In this case, there are three online tools that you need to use: pacer.gov to check on the bankruptcy filings, caleasi to check on the franchise circular, and the US trademark database. (Pacer.gov requires an account and printing pages is 0.08 per page.)
I checked on pacer.gov on the status of the bankrupcty of S & A Restaurants.
There are only 40 entities involved, including Bennigan's Gift Card company. (Which presents a whole other problem for the franchisees.)
The owner of the Bennigan trademark , however is S &A Restaurant Corporation, according to the US Trademark Database.
Whoever the new owners are have not registered the assignment, yet.
But the franchisor, Bennigan's Franchise LP is not in bankrupcty.
There is one other mystery, correctly reported by the Indiana report:
I confirmed this with bankruptcy filing: the actual filing is less precise, but it shows that S & A is solvent! Having more assets than debt.
Colour me deeply confused, at this point.
Michael Webster PhD LLB
Franchise News
Michael Webster, a franchisee attorney in Toronto, Ontario, publishes a website on business opportunities and franchises called "The BizOp News"
Michael
Since you looked at the filing, how much of the $550 mil are 'intangible' assets, that may be overvalued on the books?
jd, cannot really tell because it is simply a form. But you are probably right, meaning that they intend to "retire" on or two of the brand names - taking a hit on goodwill.
But this is clearly more of a chapter 11 than 7: some crappy locations were toasted, and the prime asset of the bankrupt, the trade marks, were assigned, all the while with the franchisor holding the franchisee contracts unaffected.
Michael Webster PhD LLB
Franchise News
Michael Webster, a franchisee attorney in Toronto, Ontario, publishes a website on business opportunities and franchises called "The BizOp News"
Peter Romeo of Nation's Restaurant News explains in his blog why Bennigan's is an important company in the restaurant industry. He helps explain the media coverage.
Don –
I could be wrong but doesn’t this situation look like a cautionary tale/prime example of a group of franchisees who had that feeling in their collective gut but failed to be proactive by forming a real association and planning? There are various stories today of these franchisees claiming to have associations, etc. but there is no real evidence of a cohesive group existing.
An organized group would have been ready with a PR statement that would have benefited franchisees and announced their plans – and issued it yesterday morning. The whole “taken by surprise” is evidence enough of the disorganization and a lack of a plan.
As multiple experts have pointed out on these boards, bankruptcies can move fast and those with their ducks in a row usually prevail.
As noted above - franchisees who organize and are proactive have a better shot at controlling their own destinies.
Time will tell.
As far as other QSR owners who likely to throw in the towel - a glance at the balance sheets will tell the story. D/E ratios, acid test, evidence of rapid expansion financed with junk debt etc. will show those most in danger of default and BK. It is harder to find this data for the non-public/hybrid QSR chains as they usually disclose only the franchise division financials. Anyone with public docs, please share them with the group!
Dan makes a good point about Bennigan's being a cautionary tale. Journalist John Tozi of BusinessWeek yesterday wrote this question about the events.
Is the leader of Bennigan's franchisee association just wishfully thinking that the new owner of the trademarks cannot do much more harm than the old?
It sounds like the trademarks were sold to the Atlanta firm. And the franchisee leader was conferenced in after the fact. This quote from Indiana's Post-Tribune stands out in regards to Bennigan's corporate closing down:
Guest writes: "The franchisees can pretty much do what they please without paying royalties now."
This seems to be a common misunderstanding.
Suppose the franchisor was in bankruptcy, which in this case is not true - it appears that only the franchisor's corporate stores held in a separate company are being liquidated.
Once in bankruptcy, the trustee takes over the assets. Franchisee agreements are one such asset, leases are another.
But the simple assignment of your franchise agreement to the trustee doesn't relieve you of any duties: nor is it a breach of the franchise agreement for the franchisor to go bankrupt, unlike what would happen to you if your company went bankrupt.
Franchisees whose franchisor is in bankruptcy need to organize and do so quickly if they want to bring about any changes - otherwise it will be business as usual.
Michael Webster PhD LLB
Franchise News
Michael Webster, a franchisee attorney in Toronto, Ontario, publishes a website on business opportunities and franchises called "The BizOp News"
Guest writes - I would think the Zor has an obligation to maintain the integrity of the restaurant names. With what has been splashed across the news the last few days, it would appear they have failed in a duty.
(and yes,I realize a suit would have to be filed. Zor holds a lot of the cards)
Reply - Well your assumption is wrong!
Where is this "duty" you reference in the franchise agreement. I haven't seen a provision in any franchise agreement I've read that requires a franchisor to maintain the integrity of the name or brand.
The Truth Shall Set You Free!
TIF
The Truth Shall Set You Free!
TIF
If that is true, that is terrible.
Bob be frank man! What does your franchise agreement say about this burning issue?
Why is it so terrible that the agreement is silent about what a franchisor does with its property (brand)?
The Truth Shall Set You Free!
TIF
The Truth Shall Set You Free!
TIF
Wrong!
Franchisees are as much controlled by the contract as they were before the bankruptcy since the franchisor entities in both cases are NOT bankrupt.
And even if the franchisor entities were bankrupt in either Chapters 7 or 11 the franchisees would be required by the franchise agreement to continue in all their obligations to the franchisor and the bankruptcy cout. The franchise agreements are not just pieces of paper they are assets that are part of the estate that the bankruptcy trustee will collect monies owed by franchisees on behalf of the estate to the benefit of creditors.
The Truth Shall Set You Free!
TIF
The Truth Shall Set You Free!
TIF
I have probably a great deal more practical experience with franchisor bankruptcies than you do.
What you don't realize is that in a bankruptcy, precisely in order to stop a mad creditor's rush, legal and self help actions are stayed by order, and to disobey the court risks a finding of contempt.
Michael Webster PhD LLB
Franchise News
Michael Webster, a franchisee attorney in Toronto, Ontario, publishes a website on business opportunities and franchises called "The BizOp News"
Michael with all respect intended I have experience as a creditor in a number of bankruptcies and as franchisor DIP.
The Truth Shall Set You Free!
TIF
The Truth Shall Set You Free!
TIF
TIF, I wasn't disagreeing with any of your comments about bankruptcy.
Michael Webster PhD LLB
Franchise News
Michael Webster, a franchisee attorney in Toronto, Ontario, publishes a website on business opportunities and franchises called "The BizOp News"
Got it!
It gets confusing and difficult to follow threads with unregistered posters on BMM.
The Truth Shall Set You Free!
TIF
The Truth Shall Set You Free!
TIF
@TIF
There is a technique which some blogs use in which when you reply to a person, automatically the person's comment is linked.
So in this case, my opening line is:
@TIF, with "@TIF" linking to your comment. No matter how many comments appear in between.
It is probably a good practice to start, until Mr. BMM gets this as a plug-in.
Michael Webster PhD LLB
Franchise News
Michael Webster, a franchisee attorney in Toronto, Ontario, publishes a website on business opportunities and franchises called "The BizOp News"
That explains a lot.
What is 18 inches long and dangles in front of an arsehole?
A lawyer's necktie.--
Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com, has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com, has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
As Elephant Man would say; I am not a lawyer!
The Truth Shall Set You Free!
TIF
The Truth Shall Set You Free!
TIF
Are you out of your mind?
The Truth Shall Set You Free!
TIF
The Truth Shall Set You Free!
TIF
Not so fast.
Not paying royalties is almost ALWAYS a very very bad idea.
Whether done individually or collectively ("royalty strike"), the situation is a bit more complicated than "Guest" would have us believe.
There are some idiot lawyers out there who have in the past indeed advised franchisees that since their franchisor breached the contract, the franchisee is free to simply stop paying royalties. But BMM readers should know better.
Paul Steinberg
Franchisee Attorney, New York City, Ph: 212-529-5400
Paul Steinberg, Franchisee Attorney, New York City, Ph: 212-529-5400
Guest writes: "if the Franchisor is bankrupt and can't fullfill his obligations under the contract"
Generally, bankruptcy doesn't entail that the franchisor cannot meet his obligations.
Michael Webster PhD LLB
Franchise News
Michael Webster, a franchisee attorney in Toronto, Ontario, publishes a website on business opportunities and franchises called "The BizOp News"
The franchisor did not file bankruptcy.
Guest writes: "However, if the surviving company that holds the Franchisee Contracts is only a "shell" company or "holding" company, it may not have the resources available to meet it's obligation once the "operating" company goes bankrupt (Chapter 7)."
The good franchise agreements will be assigned for value, and the bad ones disclaimed.
Michael Webster PhD LLB
Franchise News
Michael Webster, a franchisee attorney in Toronto, Ontario, publishes a website on business opportunities and franchises called "The BizOp News"
Post new comment