Cuppy's Speaks Out on Accusations, SBT, AAFD and More
MUSCLE SHOALS, Ala. (Blue MauMau) - Dale Nabors, new owner of Cuppy's Coffee and More, took time out from a busy schedule to answer questions surrounding the allegations and comments posted recently on Blue MauMau. First and foremost, he exclaimed that no charges have been filed against him. "I have not been personally charged or served. I have asked my legal counsel at both offices if they know anything about it. The only thing I have seen on it is the anonymous guest post on Blue MauMau."
Nabors also answered questions regarding accusations of criminal behavior connected to his company which has been hinted at by posters who are following the Cuppy's story. He said he had not focused a lot of his time on the things that have been done in the past, but he has seen things that he wouldn't have done if he had been in charge. "Do I think a franchisor should have an entity like Elite which was allowed to accept money and sign purchase orders before a franchise agreement was approved? No, I don’t. Was it structured in way that probably met legal requirements? I think it probably was. But does that make it right? No." He said when Cuppy's resumes selling franchises, which he suspended after acquiring the company last April, it will be a much more normal process of franchising.
In the past, Nabors said almost simultaneous to signing a franchise agreement a franchisee would enter into an Elite purchase order. Then, in most cases, the PO was signed long before they ever got a lease. Then construction contracts had been entered into for a space that had been undetermined which he says is part of what created a tremendous number of the problems, problems that the company had faced in the past and that they are still dealing with today.
Does Nabors think that anybody went out and intentionally committed a crime? He says no. He feels things were done in the wrong order, the wrong sequence of time. But he adds, "I do think it’s a crime to have 168 stores sitting out here on the pipeline that need to be built out, that need to get opened. That’s why my focus has been to resolve these construction issues." And he does think it is a crime to continue to sell franchises when franchisees are maximizing their success.
SBT and that Infamous "Exhibit D"
Nabors is quick to state there was never a contract with SBT (Supreme Building Technologies). "SBT had been a company that previous ownership and management had partnered with to do build outs. So Elite was intended to serve as a construction management company. It was to manage the process of build outs for franchisees. They in turn then subcontracted out the construction aspects of the projects to SBT as it related to in-line construction."
Nabors said the same owners of SBT also owned MBM (Modular Buildings of Monroe), which also had no contract with Elite. He said, "It was simply based on an initial agreement for one project and then that parlayed into additional projects being completed. The way the business was being conducted is what dictated the relationship." But he adds, "What I quickly realized and understood was that because one of the principals of SBT and MBM had been made the president of Elite, that created a lot of conflict. It created a lot of bad business decisions being made and there was sloppy bookkeeping on both ends. It created somewhat of a nightmare."
Although Nabors believes that MBM can produce a quality building in a manufacturing environment, he does not believe that SBT can perform quality construction services across the country. "A lot has been said in the blogs about the infamous Exhibit D, which is where I had supposedly agreed to continue to use SBT. But what has been missed is that I agreed that projects that had been sold where Elite contracts were in place, prior to the acquisition, SBT would be able to continue to do the build outs contingent upon their ability to perform the work. To perform it well, in a reasonable amount of time, and at a fair price." Nabors said it quickly became obvious that SBT could not do that. "If they were unable to do those constructions I was not in any way bound to continue to use them."
As he continued to dig into the problems due to the offset of poor quality, planning and permitting problems, delays in construction where rents were paid on behalf of customers, he found most were created by a principal in SBT, who was also serving as the president of Elite. Nabors explained in detail how Hayes would operate between the two companies, mainly playing both sides. He said money was moving between the two entities at such a fast pace, with poor bookkeeping on both ends, it was hard to keep up with what was really going on. That went on for 14 to 16 months.
After Nabors requested the resignation of Brian Hayes and ended the relationship with the builder, he received the lawsuit for monies allegedly owed to SBT, claiming $1.7 million. In a meeting with SBT and the attorneys he hired in Indiana, they showed the appropriate accounting on how it all transpired. They are currently negotiating a settlement agreement because the company does owe SBT some money. But he said it is nowhere near the $1.7 million after the offsets and adjustments are made. "We showed them factually what we believe the number to be and we have agreed to pay them those monies if they settle the agreement."
They also solicited SBT's help on delayed projects of franchisee who were caught in the middle of the SBT fiasco. SBT has agreed to remove the liens it filed against the franchisees' and landlords' properties—liens they feel were filed inappropriately. He has seen the paperwork on one so far, so time will tell if they are dismissed.
Cuppy's New National Partner
According to Nabors, Cuppy's has 89 stores open and operating, which consists of approximately 40 double drive-through (modular buildings) and 40 free-standing inline cafe models. The rest are split between carts and kiosks. There are approximately 168 stores to be completed with build outs. Of those there are roughly 60 that have leases and are at the top of the build out schedule. "With the remaining stores, we are continuing to assist franchisees to find good locations. But at the same time we are bringing in new construction partners to facilitate and aid the franchisees with their construction, we are not pushing the others to quickly sign leases until we get these 60 open with their build outs."
Nabors said they have partnered in a strategic alliance relationship with a national contractor that has been part of a company involved with Starbuck's acquisition of Seattle's Best Coffee in opening 600 locations in a 12-month period. He explained, "So they had a proven track record in getting coffee shops open—opened quickly across the country—being part of a network of experienced contractors. We finally got the agreement finalized and as of Monday they were on their first five job sites."
Cuppy's now has five crews working on the build outs of the stores. Nabors said the estimated white box status which the franchisees are responsible for, to full trade dress, is approximately a 10-day process. "Our goal currently is to do 16 stores a month and ramp up from there. We want to have 60 stores with leases signed completed by the end of the year. As we are moving through this we will be able to handle the pipeline to expedite leases for the remaining franchisees, so we can roll straight into getting those build outs done as quickly as possible.
Nabors said the 168 build outs they are looking at should be completed by the end of the first quarter of 2009.
Financing and Cost Reduction
Nabors explained that the Cuppy's franchisee support component was very small compared to the construction components that existed. "When I acquired the franchise, Elite had the construction agreements with the franchisees, Cuppy's the franchisor had the funding for Cuppy's as they opened the 168. Those stores are royalty paying franchisees. Based on projections of what those stores should do and what the royalty payments will be, and putting us at 300 stores, that will fund Cuppy's very nicely.
When asked how he was financing Cuppy's, Nabors explained he was having to put capital into the businesses to keep them moving forward, and some of those monies in turn are used for construction and build out. He said there had been projects that monies were paid on and those monies went into a general operating account and were not used specifically for a project. Now, he said, there are projects that need to be completed. Each is a stand-alone project and the funds are for those projects. They are basically going into the equivalent of a checkbook register and there are certain incremental draws that are received and payments made. He said they are balancing it out. "I’m putting money into the company, and the company is putting money into the projects. In a roundabout way I guess it’s fair to say yes, I am putting money into the company to cover some of these projects. But these are very few projects."
Most of the projects they have, according to Nabors, are in good shape, but the projects they are challenged by are those that were at midstream, where former management allowed monies to go into the general operating accounting instead of allowing the profitability from that project to go into the general operating account. "So of the 168 projects, we’ve got seven or eight that we are having to struggle through, but we are going to be able to take care of them," he said.
Nabors said he does not have any investors, although they have talked to a number of people who are interested. But at this time they feel it would not be good to accept outside investment monies because the company does not need to take on additional debt load.
The key success of Cuppy's is to reduce the overhead costs, which Nabors says they have been doing gradually since he acquired it. "The company had an enormous overhead in Ft. Walton Beach, Florida. As publicized, it had 146 employees at one time. It has also been reported that it leased 19,000 sq ft of office space overlooking the Gulf of Mexico, which was not cheap real estate."
Cuppy's relocation to Alabama was part of that cost reduction. "We are bringing the company in line so we can operate within a budget, as opposed to going outside and pulling in equity investors. With the current state of the company, not a lot of people would be interested in investing." He said there is no reason to put it further in debt when they have the capability of working through it with the resources they have. But he states, "The real key to that is getting our stores open in the shortest amount of time."
In summarizing Cuppy's goals, Nabors said as they transition from the old model of the past, where the company was a lot more focused on construction and less on serving the franchisees, they are reducing their expenses associated with that dramatically. He said, "We'll gradually be building up the Cuppy's side, the franchisor side, based on the revenues from those future royalties on the stores to be opened.
Is Cuppy's the Best or Worst Decision You Ever Made?
Nabors said he wakes up every morning asking himself whether acquiring Cuppy's has been the best or worst decision he ever made. "When I woke up the other morning and saw that posting on Blue MauMau falsely stating that Dale Nabors was served with federal charges, I thought about my children in school and having one of their friends coming up to them and saying, hey, I hear your daddy was served with federal charges. I've relocated the company to Muscle Shoals where I live in a great community with great people who are excited to see a new company come in. We hope to grow and hire good, honest, hard-working people that are committed to serving our franchisees. So the whole Muscle Shoals gets bashed. That bothers me. "
He continued saying that the one thing everybody has to understand is they have to protect the brand. There are 80 stores open, another 160 that need to open. Franchisees have made their investment and all they want to do is accomplish their personal goals and objectives, but this trash is simply hurting them. "Can I save it? I don't know." But he said he is committed to doing everything in his power to do so. He feels his motives for buying the company were right and he doesn't regret it.
Nabors said, "There is no money to be made with the mess we have right now. The money is to be made if we can rectify this, get our stores open and profitable, get franchisees feeling good about paying royalties, and bringing our overhead and operation costs in line where we can live off the monies we bring in from royalties.
But he says, "Only time will tell if it was a great or terrible business decision."
(Reporter's note: More articles to be published on Cuppy's Speaking Out (Topics: AAFD and Funding Solutions.)
--
Related readings:
- Cuppy's New CEO To Improve Operations and Meet Refund Obligations
- Cuppy's Coffee Goes to Court- SBT Sues Elite Mfg
- Cuppy's Franchisees Desperately Plead for Answers
- Official Response of SBT
- FranSynergy Cleans Cuppy's House

It was written:
Generally by offering equity positions if the numbers crunch out right.
FuwaFuwaUsagi
FuwaFuwaUsagi
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers."
Unfortunately for Cuppy's franchisees, the above statement is simply not true.
Nabors has taken some necessary (but unpopular) actions and it is understandable that many folks want to shoot the messenger, especially since the folks who created (and benefited from) the mess are long gone.
But his failure to be candid about what happened under the previous management undercuts his credibility, and it leaves the field open to anonymous bloggers who present a limited set of a much larger set of facts.
Dale doesn't need to "build the Dream," Dale needs to turnaround a business on which a lot of families livelihoods depend. He doesn't need a cheering section, he needs f'zees, lenders, and vendors who believe he has a plausible chance of salvaging the company.
Paul Steinberg
Franchisee Attorney, New York City, Ph: 212-529-5400
Paul Steinberg, Franchisee Attorney, New York City, Ph: 212-529-5400
Cuppy's old buddy, attorney John Dozier, is back in the news again. Dozier's work as the attorney for Cuppy's has been documented previously here on BMM, and Franchise Times unquestioningly published Dozier's bragging about squelching speech (an odd thing for a news publication).
For those interested in Dozier's recent antics, read the update from this Tuesday on the Fraud Files blog .
Oops... can't say "fraud" and "Cuppy's" in the same sentence.
Repeat with me and "zor1" :
There is no fraud at Cuppy's.
There is no fraud at Cuppy's.
There is no fraud at Cuppy's.
Now click your red slippers together 3 times, and your store will be built out and the "depositor" money paid back.
Paul Steinberg
Franchisee Attorney, New York City, Ph: 212-529-5400
Paul Steinberg, Franchisee Attorney, New York City, Ph: 212-529-5400
a blog site www.SuckLickNibble&Munch.org - on that blog site, folks could list their favorite targets and rate them as Suck, Lick, Nibble or Munch.--
Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com, has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com, has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
Hello All,
I am new to this site and just to let everyone know I have been a franchisee in the past as well as a franchisor. I have been doing a lot of reading on this site and would like to give my input on a few topics. Let's start with Cuppy's.
Whenever a franchise system starts going south everyone starts yelling "FRAUD". Let's clarify this. "FRAUD" is a word used by attorneys who like to sue franchisors. This is how they make their living. I have seen a lot of lawsuits filed against franchisors and they all look identical. There is no "FRAUD" here people. It benefits every franchisor for the system to be successful, and for all it's franchisees to be profitable. Unfortuantely that is not reality. Businesses succeed and businesses fail. The worst thing any franchisee can do is have a bad relationship with their franchisor. Once the franchisor receives bad publicity the franchise system itself which includes the franchisee's begin to suffer as well. I urge everyone with Cuppy's to transfer their energy into making their business a success instead of wasting energy in defaming corporate.
I am giving everyone my most honest opinions.
Look forward to feedback.
If you've been reading this website for a while, you would've realized that most of the Cuppy stories went away for the last six months of 2007. Not until there was a group of 'depositors' that came on the web asking for refunds (that were allowed as part of their purchase agreement) did we hear of any additional issues with this franchisor. Why did they come on the web, because they couldn't get in touch with the corporate office and they wouldn't return their phone calls. Why? Because they didn't have the money to refund them. It seems as if most of this group has settled with Cuppy's, and only they know if they are getting paid their settlement.
Then comes the new allegations. That Cuppy's/Elite/etc. has franchisees that have paid their entire SBA loans out to Elite, yet don't have anything to show for it. I don't know if this fits the legal definition of 'fraud', but I'm sure it is something similar.
These depositors and people that had $200k of their loans disbursed are not to blame here. Management of Cuppy's (past & present) are to blame. Based on what people have said, they've been unwilling to work with these people until after it hits these forums.
And of course, there is all of the "depositor" money which disappeared, and still has not been paid back. And there is the money disbursed by lenders pursuant to representations made by Elite. And don't even get me started on pro formas and business plans.
If "zor1" believes that anyone is "defaming corporate" then there is a remedy. Bring a suit and get damages.
Then, "zor1"-- you can use some of that money to pay back all those people you owe.
Oh wait, I forgot: if you bring suit, a lot of unpleasant things can come up in discovery. Yeah, better to keep on cheerleading and telling hapless "depositors" and folks paying rent on empty "white box" stores that it is their fault for not "making their business a success."
Believe and succeed!
Morgan did. Dale did. You can too.
Paul Steinberg
Franchisee Attorney, New York City, Ph: 212-529-5400
Paul Steinberg, Franchisee Attorney, New York City, Ph: 212-529-5400
"Whenever a franchise system starts going south everyone starts yelling "FRAUD"."
True, but you take then that to the opposite extreme and conclude there never is any fraud.
" "FRAUD" is a word used by attorneys who like to sue franchisors. This is how they make their living."
True. What's your point?
" I have seen a lot of lawsuits filed against franchisors and they all look identical."
Setting aside my view that they don't all look identical, they don't all turn out identically, do they?
"The worst thing any franchisee can do is have a bad relationship with their franchisor."
Too many franchisees remain deferential to their franchisor til the bitter end, attempting to hang on while deficit spending and praying that the franchisor will save them even when the handwriting is on the wall. That is far worse for them than a little blunt talk with a franchisor. If the franchisor is more interested in obedience than information, you just know it isn't going to end well.
Welcome to the board zor1,
We may not always agree, but I enjoy reading posts from the "other" side. Now back on topic:
"FRAUD" is also an act of deception which has been taken in the past by certain franchisors in order to take personnal gains at the cost of others. I am not familiar with Cuppy's situation, but I was also involved in franchising as a zee (obviously you know by my tag) where I believe the verbiage of the contract has been misused and abused. Please don't confuse the two as one is frivolous and one is not.
Looking forward to your posts,
Ex Zee
What kind of federal charges will Dale face? What crime or crimes did he commit?
The Truth Shall Set You Free!
TIF
The Truth Shall Set You Free!
TIF
I must have missed the answer Cowardly Guest Troll, maybe you could be so kind as to repeat the answer.
The Truth Shall Set You Free!
TIF
The Truth Shall Set You Free!
TIF
I thought calling others names was not permitted on this forum.
Does TIF have special privileges?
I must have missed the answer Cowardly Guest Troll, maybe you could be so kind as to repeat the answer.
The Truth Shall Set You Free!
TIF
The Truth Shall Set You Free!
TIF
You should know better than to think that your shout downs could work with me.
The Truth Shall Set You Free!
TIF
The Truth Shall Set You Free!
TIF
It was written:
STFU
My comment:
I would take it as a personal favor if you could refrain from using profanity, even in an abstract form.
FuwaFuwaUsagiFuwaFuwaUsagi
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers."
It was written:
Fuwa, you have to be kidding too. Better tell your buddy Counselor Solomon, who uses out and out sexually suggestive terminology quite often. You don't seem to have a problem with that (I don't, I think it's funny), so quit being an obvious hypocrite. If STFU offends you, you must pee your pants in dismay when you read the good Counselor's posts.
My reply:
If you search the archives you will find a couple of posts where I asked Richard to refrain from such proclamations. And I addressed the issue to the forum at large. In large part this is because there are some, what is now termed - disadvantaged -, youths that do utilize this forum for learning about business. Part of their education is trying to get them to understand that general vernacular of the business world is not the vernacular of the street. The hope is this will translate into better first time job retention rates.
You may also note I chided my dear friend Michael for an analogous abbreviation, though for slightly different reasons.
Lastly, what Solomon or someone else does I have no control over. I politely asked you for a favor, you can determine how it reflects on you by your response going forward.
Regards,
FuwaFuwaUsagi
FuwaFuwaUsagi
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers."
Gang:
There are a couple of quotes that really leap out at me, I have reproduced them below and emphasized some key words.
Nabors said he does not have any investors, although they have talked to a number of people who are interested. But at this time they feel it would not be good to accept outside investment monies because the company does not need to take on additional debt
Cuppy's relocation to Alabama was part of that cost reduction. "We are bringing the company in line so we can operate within a budget, as opposed to going outside and pulling in equity investors. With the current state of the company, not a lot of people would be interested in investing." He said there is no reason to put it further in debt load. when they have the capability of working through it with the resources they have. But he states, "The real key to that is getting our stores open in the shortest amount of time."
My comment:
First of all Dale purchased this company so it is his to run. That being stated he is making some choices that are clearly in his best interests rather then the zees. If you look above you can see he is clearly distinguishing between debt and equity investors. As a refresher, debt instruments pay the bearer interest, which can be paid as a lump sum or on-going, which can lead to liquidity issues. However equity investments do not leave to liquidity issues for the issuer, however the do lead to sharing of future profits, something is appears Dale is not currently willing to do.
Stated differently, it appears Dale is not willing to take on equity investors because they would want a reward commensurate with the ensuing risk but it also appear there is a choice in this matter and Dale has made that choice.
Academically there is some interesting historical social business commentary that could accompany this, but I doubt it would intrigue anyone other than Michael so I’ll let it lay.
FuwaFuwaUsagi
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers."
FuwaFuwaUsagi
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers."
It was written:
NO ONE invested and there must be some reason for that
My reply:
I would strongly suggest that the singular reason there are no investors is Dale would not reliquish an equity share that adequately compensated said potential investor.
FuwaFuwaUsagi
FuwaFuwaUsagi
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers."
Fuwa writes:
'I would strongly suggest that the singular reason there are no investors is Dale would not reliquish an equity share that adequately compensated said potential investor.'
I differ with Fuwa on one thing here. Morg sold the company to Dale, and I would imagine that Morg had other potential investors into the company prior to selling to Dale. These potential would've had 100% equity in the company if they would've liked, so they saw this company as a 'dog'.
I'd be curious to know, if any of these potential investors got to the point where they were looking at the company books, because just from the outside, people know the following:
1. Elite (the entity making the profit) couldn't pay their own subcontractor for work which led to a lawsuit.
2. You've got the new owner admitting that there was 'sloppy' bookkeeping. I doubt many investors would be impressed with that.
3. You've got SBA loans being disbursed without anything to show for that, leaving potentially 'huge' liabilities on the company to eventually build-out those stores, or repay the money.
4. Looking at the 1st 9-months of 2007, Cuppy's had a total of $17,500 in revenue (doesn't look good to any investor).
JD writes:
I differ with Fuwa on one thing here. Morg sold the company to Dale, and I would imagine that Morg had other potential investors into the company prior to selling to Dale. These potential would've had 100% equity in the company if they would've liked, so they saw this company as a 'dog'.
My reply:
Oh, you may not actually differ. There area few implicit assumptions I was making that I did not state. There is a long version and a short version. But what someone paid for a company, what someone wants for a company and what someone is willing to pay are often different things. Right now, Cuppies is worth Y amount. Most likely Y is significantly different than what X was when Morg was trying wither to potentially bring in investors or valuing the company.
So in the end, it becomes a matter of valuation. An investor will bite when the potential return matches the desired calculated reward. There is money to be made here, that should be fairly clear. But the stores need to be opened and the royalties need to flow, an investor can see that. The question becomes what piece of the action are you willing to give them in order to get the capital needed.
So what I am saying is what was paid for Cuppies, what someone thinks it is worth is not relevant, what is relevant is what it will take to get capital in the company. And some party might rather burn the company than address that.
FuwaFuwaUsagi
FuwaFuwaUsagi
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers."
I've gotta question Dale's business abilities on the comments he's made about SBT/Elite.
Before you buy a company, don't you review the entities financial statements, make sure what you are showing on your financial statements agree to what SBT says you owe them, and if not hire an accountant to go in and audit or perform agreed upon procedures to find out.
I don't believe Dale when he says that he didn't know that he owed SBT that much or the reason for Exhibit D.
Michael's point of spending B's money to finish building out A's store is wrong and it seems to still be happening under his watch.
Also, I find it funny that he responds to the post about the 'federal charges', yet won't respond to franchisee's e-mails.
I expect the comments on AAFD & Funding Solutions to be the same and he's placing the blame on them, just like he placed the ALL of the blame on prior management.
I agree with much of what "JD" writes, and would suggest that people view the infamous Exhibit D (click link, go to page 6 of 15) themselves, and see if there is anything about any contingencies. Then remember the circumstances under which Exhibit D was signed, and see if Dale Nabors' statement makes sense.
I also agree with Michael Webster as to the admission Dale Nabors has made about shifting money around. Even if it was not Dale Nabors personally, he is now the owner of this mess and as such one would think the man would get adequate legal counsel prior to speaking with reporters and making statements which may be used in legal proceedings.
Dale Nabors' statement leaves Funding Solutions LLC and other loan brokers (and the bank underwriters of these loans) in a dilemma.
There is an admission that money was paid and buildouts not completed, an admission that monies were commingled, an admission that there was undisclosed cross-ownership and questionable bookkeeping...
...and now Dale Nabors says to give him more millions of dollars and all will be well?!!
Any bank that makes disbursements at this point without the express direction of the borrower is begging for a lawsuit once the borrower defaults.
Dale Nabors did not create this mess, and I am not without sympathy for his plight.
But banks are not known for sympathy, and particularly in the wake of the BLX funding scandal they are unlikely to want to get hauled up on Capitol Hill.
Paul Steinberg
Franchisee Attorney, New York City, Ph: 212-529-5400
Paul Steinberg, Franchisee Attorney, New York City, Ph: 212-529-5400
Elite has it's hands full. Since 2007, it has been "constructing" its website .
Maybe they should hire a high school nerd.
Come to think of it, they could hire a few day laborers while they're at it and get both their website and their stores constructed.
Paul Steinberg
Franchisee Attorney, New York City, Ph: 212-529-5400
Paul Steinberg, Franchisee Attorney, New York City, Ph: 212-529-5400
that website did have some pretty pictures up and a testimonial from Doug Hibbing talking about how good of a company they were. I think Dale did an overhaul on all of the Cuppy's owned websites, although he still owns this one (censored for Fuwa's purposes):
Registrant:
Medina Management Strategies, LLC
348 Miracle Strip Pkwy
Suite 34
Fort Walton Beach, Florida 32548
United States
Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: F***CUPPYS.COM
Created on: 06-Mar-07
Expires on: 06-Mar-09
Last Updated on: 06-Mar-08
The reality is that Cuppys/Elite was able to avoid escrowing the deposits and sell franchises in states that they were not registered.
The particular fraud that Cuppy's pulled on the California Regulator work like this.
1. The California regulator required either a bond, or for Cuppy's to change their franchise agreement to make it clear that the franchise fee was not earned until the build out was complete.
2. Cuppy's chose to "modify" their franchise agreement, by striking out certain words but not changing the way they solicited franchisees.
3. Elite collected the franchise fee, and is likely, because of the cross-ownership, both secret and in fact, conditions a franchisor.
4. But, since Elite collected the franchise fee, Cuppy's could represent to the Regulator that its franchisee fee was not earned until the build out was finished - that is if and when Elite or its agents finished the build out.
This is a fraud on California Regulator. It is plain sneaky behaviour that has no place in modern franchising.
Wrong sequence of time? I have spoken to a number of franchises who have had their SBA loan disbursed for work that they say was not done.
Invoiced but not performed.
Not done, but with Elite claiming to the Bank that they had paid invoices that upon direct contact with the supplier, the supplier denies being paid.
If these allegations are true, then Cuppy's and Elite are defrauding both the Banks -who have nothing to show for their collateral- and the SBA -whose guarantee has been materially more risky.
When Nabors says "he was having to put capital into the businesses to keep them moving forward, and some of those monies in turn are used for construction and build out.
He said there had been projects that monies were paid on and those monies went into a general operating account and were not used specific for a project." this is an admission of fraud.
When Nabor says "but the projects they are challenged by are those that were at mid-stream where former management allowed monies to go into the general operating accounting instead of allowing the profitability from that project to go into the general operating account.
"So of the 168 projects we’ve got seven or eight that we are having to struggle through, but we are going to be able to take care of them," he told. " this is an admission of fraud.
You cannot take money borrowed by A to pay off building out B, although you can certainly count on the support of B when that happens or is promised to happen.
This is not a construction company pretending to be a franchise company.
This is a construction ponzi scheme, taking funds from later investors, paying off earlier investors, pretending to be a franchise company.
These related entities are insolvent and the creditors need to shut this mess down immediately, appoint a receiver and come to an equitable solution.
Nabors call for more time is the typical whine of a ponzi operator.
It is not acceptable that deposit funds, draws on construction loans, should fund "the profitability" of Nabors' companies.
This scheme is a brazen and calculated attempt to string the franchisees along until they are either bankrupt -because they cannot afford the payment on the SBA loan, or lose their lease because they cannot afford to pay the lease while waiting to get white room ready.
Michael Webster PhD LLB
Franchise News
Michael Webster, a franchisee attorney in Toronto, Ontario, publishes a website on business opportunities and franchises called "The BizOp News"
Webster raises a line of logic which may cause various states (including California, Maryland, and Illinois, among others) to require Cuppy's to offer a rescission and possibly suspend Cuppy's from offering franchises for sale in their respective states.
That could pose a serious problem for the stability of the franchise system. And of course, a practical problem insofar as Cuppy's doesn't have the money any more.
Paul Steinberg
Franchisee Attorney, New York City, Ph: 212-529-5400
Paul Steinberg, Franchisee Attorney, New York City, Ph: 212-529-5400
Paul writes: "Webster raises a line of logic which may cause various states (including California, Maryland, and Illinois, among others) to require Cuppy's to offer a rescission and possibly suspend Cuppy's from offering franchises for sale in their respective states."
Everyone who has retained an attorney should look into this alternative, but don't expect that the state AG is going to get you your money back - just some added legal pressure.
Michael Webster PhD LLB
Franchise News
Michael Webster, a franchisee attorney in Toronto, Ontario, publishes a website on business opportunities and franchises called "The BizOp News"
Post new comment