Home | MyMauMau: Log In / Register | Ask Franny
Log In / Register | Feb 9, 2010

INTERVIEW: Flip Flop Shops CEO Says Will Not Use Vendor Kickbacks, Will Change Contract

Feet of Flip Flop Shops CEO,  Darin Kraetsch
The feet of Flip Flop Shops' CEO

IRVINE, Calif. - Chief executive officer Darin Kraetsch discusses his new franchise venture, the Flip Flop Shops. Mr. Kraetsch, who helped Raving Brands launch Moe's Southwest Grill, has joined with executives from Cold Stone Creamery and Nike to kick off the franchise chain. Their niche footwear runs from $20 to $120 a pair. They see a growing need among the discriminating young consumers who typically must buy Reef, havainas, Roxy, OluKai and other brands online if they want to wear flip-flops they like in their locality.

A Blue MauMau blog was critical of the concept's franchise disclosure document regarding product kickbacks provided to franchise prospects. “The offering circular notes that the franchisor may require purchase of materials from companies which pay a 'rebate' to the franchisor, but does not specify details," the blogger wrote. "In the past, Raving Brands was accused by franchisees of obtaining vendor kickbacks, and Coldstone Creamery franchisees have complained of the franchisor charging fees for various required purchases.”

Mr. Kraetsch (size 10) decided to respond. “I understand that not everyone will like Flip Flop Shops and that some will voice concerns. I very much respect their right to say so,” he replies. “We simply want a chance to show you and the franchise industry that there are new franchise systems that are doing everything possible the right way.”

Q: Why should someone buy Flip Flop Shops? It seems like such a narrow market, when there are so many retail opportunities out there.

From a popularity standpoint, flip-flops are not going away. High school and college students are wearing them 365 days a year. It is a $20 billion industry and an industry that outsold athletic shoes in 2006, the first time in history. Nowadays you aren't just wearing the $3 shower slippers of the past to the beach or pool. Now you are talking about orthopedically correct insoles with heel cups and arch supports with premium leather and hard rubber. So you are talking about a completely different product from what used to be.

When you start asking why flip-flops, you really are talking about specialty retailers like Sunglass Hut. Can you imagine when the founders of Lids , a chain of hundreds of stores that specialize in just athletic hats, said, “Hey, we got a great idea. We are going to open up a little shop and all we are going to sell is baseball hats.”?

The reality is that in specialty retail, when you have a core focus that you spend all your energy being great on, then I think the tendency is that you provide a very good retail experience. We are not trying to be all things to all people. The inventory is easier to manage because you are only managing one product line. You aren't managing flip-flops, T-shirts, beanie babies and cotton candy.

The number one reason people are considering flip-flops is because of their incredible popularity and the fact that we are a shop that focuses on one core product. The cost of entry is relatively low compared to other retail opportunities such as, for example, food franchises.

Q: There are other $20 billion dollar or more industries out there. What did you see that made you decide to invest in franchising flip-flop shops?

Two things. Alexander Babbage, a retail research firm, did in-store consumer intercepts. They saw that our customer core was 16- to 28 year-olds and that 26 percent of the people that we got feedback from said that they had actually come to the regional mall to visit our Flip Flop Shops again. That information, along with data compiled since the opening of the very first Flip Flop Shops in September of 2004 (a temp shop in Boston) was used along with other industry data by Windsor Realty to create a custom predictive model for site selection.

When Chris Zimmerman, who is one of our advisory board members, an investor in the company and a former president of Nike, said this is really very special, we took notice.

Q: How many company-owned stores are there? Do any of your executives own Flip Flop Shops?

FFS_AngleShot320
Flip Flop Shops, Irvine Spectrum Center, Calif.
We have three company-owned stores. Two are owned by the company founder, the first one was established in 2004. I own one in Arizona. The chain will soon open six franchises.

I believe that it is important to put my personal money where my mouth is, so I purchased a shop from the founder prior to franchising the concept. I operate this shop with my brother in Arizona.

Q: Give a sense of the robustness of the systems you've put in place for selling and operating a franchise system.

We have invested heavily to ensure we set our franchise system up for success. We started with the creation of the franchise disclosure document (FDD), which we had prepared by DLA Piper. All of the principals attended a full day compliance class conducted by DLA Piper specifically for Flip Flop Shops.

Our FDD is registered with FranData system. We disclose sales information in Item 19. We provide detailed estimated cost information and a branded business plan template that franchisees can use if they wish. Our FDD clearly shows that we have experience not only in other systems, but also in Flip Flop Shops.

I believe that the business acumen of our team and our advisory board is very credible. We can agree that the systems referenced in the blog have had their issues and in fact have them now, but the experience that three of us have had in franchising for the last almost 15 years and a couple of thousand units has been quite a hands-on education. Between Alan, Brian and me, we have had direct oversight of every function area of a franchise organization. The founders are both  involved in the day-to-day operations of the franchise company and have been Flip Flop Shops entrepreneurs full-time since 2004. The bios for our advisory board speak for themselves and are on the website.

Q: What has your executive team learned from their experience with troubled Moe's Southwest Grill or Cold Stone Creamery that will help your system stand above the competition? Above mediocrity?

Unlike past systems, this management team will never lose sight of the one key ingredient of successful franchising that so many systems really don’t understand or have chosen to ignore — unit economics. One of the greatest lessons the founders of Flip Flop Shops taught us was how to understand the numbers. The shops that they have closed over the years have been locations that had rent factors that didn’t work for the concept. This is a lesson that Cold Stone Creamery never learned.

You have to always keep your finger on the pulse of unit economics. It can look good. It can taste good. It can feel good. But if the unit economics do not work, the franchise system will not work. First and foremost, this management team has a clear understanding of unit economics. We are setting up franchisees in places where unit economics will work.

There were great lessons learned on both sides of the street. Doug Ducey [former CEO] of Cold Stone Creamery had a very clear vision of where he wanted the company to go. 

I'm talking about doing analysis on the front end. Sometimes you start taking chances with franchise investment when the rent factor doesn't match unit economics. Franchisors can grow so fast that they lose touch with food, rent and cost of goods sold.

Doing the right thing is actually harder than doing the wrong thing. Franchisors are very good at talking about doing the right things. Flip Flop Shops has been laser focused to make sure that we are doing the right things for our franchisees.

There's a story about one of our franchisees in Galveston. Galveston got wiped off the map. We allowed her to move her franchise to Delaware and then gave her first right of refusal for Galveston, Texas for the rest of her life. It took me thirty minutes to explain that decision to a Yale-educated lawyer of ours. The addendum to the contract actually says, “for the rest of her life.” I made the lawyer put that in.

Q: What are your system's same-store earnings and store profits?

We disclose sales figures for the shops in Item 19 in the FDD. We haven't done our new FDD for '08, but same-store sales were down in '08 compared to '07. The one that I owned was the high number.

From 6 sample stores

High

Medium

Low

No. of Stores

1

3

2

Avg Gross Sales (unaudited)

$394,445

$278,489

$201,538

From Flip Flop Shops' 2007 franchise disclosure document, Item 19

I do think it is time that franchisors are forced to disclose earnings estimates. Our Item 19 FDD earnings disclosure this year will not be as rosy as they were in 2007. But, hey, they're real numbers. It is what it is. Now you have a business decision to make about what it is, what you think it will be and what you think you should do with it. We think franchise systems that don't disclose sales numbers in some form or fashion in Item 19 are doing a serious disservice to potential franchisees. I would support legislation that required it.

You want to protect franchisees? You let them have more information. That's how you do it.

We had a potential buyer call us from a discovery day for NexCen Brands [parent company of franchise chain The Athlete's Foot and other retail brands]. They spent all day in a formal suit and tie discovery day, called us from their hotel room and learned more about Flip Flop Shops in that phone call. Two weeks later, they were franchisees. They didn't feel everything was smoke and mirrors with us.

Q: Was your own store profitable in 2008?

Yes, it was profitable. However, retail sales were way down in '08, about as much as the industry.

Q: Sales were considerably down in the retail industry in 2008. How far down are we talking about with your store?

I think we are talking about (being down) in the 20-25% range in 2008.

Q: You wrote a response to a blog that although the Flip Flop Shops franchise agreement says it can use rebates (kickbacks), the company won't actually exercise that clause. Kickbacks are a notorious way for franchisors to increase their revenue stream by creating a hidden royalty that franchise owners cannot really monitor or know how much is going to the franchisor. If you don't plan to use kickbacks, why not just come out with that in your agreement?

The rebate language in the franchise disclosure document is very standard language and is a topic that we are especially sensitive to. As long as I am associated with Flip Flop Shops at any level, we will never use rebates for company profit. Period! At the present time we do not receive any and there are no plans to change that. If and when that ever changes we will disclose it and make it 100 percent transparent for the franchisees and use it to benefit them directly. We are all very impassioned about this issue. It is actually a great example of one of the many great lessons learned through our other experiences.

Hang on.

[Pause]

The president of Flip Flop Shops and I just made an executive decision while on the phone with you. In our next Franchise Disclosure Document that comes out, our language will be written to clearly state that any rebates from manufacturers will go to the benefit of franchisees. That's how committed we are to doing the right thing in our franchise system.

Lawyers tell us that it will affect the value when franchisors sell because the next group that comes in will be a bunch of money-hungry pigs. They are going to want to figure out how they can squeeze everybody. But you know what? We aren't going to let it happen. Not on our watch. Period.

I thank Blue MauMau for challenging us on that. That is just another example of doing the right thing, even though it is the hard decision. If you've been around this industry for ten minutes, the language in our FDD is standard. That is boiler plate language. We are going to raise the bar and do it differently. We are going to keep living the core value of doing the right thing.

Q: How much will it run to invest in a franchise?

$170 - $175,000, including the franchise fee and $30,000 in inventory. That is a turnkey number. It can go up and down on some factors. The franchise fee is $25,000. The royalty is 5 percent of [a franchise's] gross sales and the marketing fee is half a percent of sales.

I hope you respect the fact that we cared enough about our brand, our reputations and most importantly our franchisees to contact you directly with our thoughts as opposed to hiding and hoping it would pass. Let’s put it this way, since we have started Flip Flop Shops, we all sleep very well at night, first time in many years.

--

Resources:

Flip Flop Shops 2007 franchise disclosure document for potential buyers

0
Your rating: None

79 Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Flip Flop on Rebates by michael webster
michael webster's picture

The CEO states: "The rebate language in the franchise disclosure document is very standard language and is a topic that we are especially sensitive to.

As long as I am associated with Flip Flop Shops at any level, we will never use rebates for company profit.

Period!

At the present time we do not receive any and there are no plans to change that.

If and when that ever changes we will disclose it and make it 100 percent transparent for the franchisees and use it to benefit them directly.

We are all very impassioned about this issue. It is actually a great example of one of the many great lessons learned through our other experiences."

Who cares about company profit?  Franchisees care that the rebates are used to expand the network for everyone's benefits.

The CEO could use the rebates to line his own pockets and still claim that the rebates were not being used for "company profit".

Very much look forward to seeing the new FDD language next year. 

Michael Webster, a franchisee attorney in Toronto, Ontario, publishes a website on business opportunities and franchises called "The BizOp News"


Michael Webster, a franchisee attorney in Toronto, Ontario, publishes a website on business opportunities and franchises called "The BizOp News"


A Big Red Flag by Guest
When it comes to any concept you potential franchisee needs to understand those that put together the franchise system are going to have YOU by the balls. You can't get loose at all. they've got your name, they've got your number, they'll have you screaming bloody thunder. You can't get away from them all. Too bad. They've got you by the balls. These guys will suck you dry - and they'll enjoy it. They're from noted franwads Raving Brands and Cold Stone Creamery. They already know all the dirty tricks of the game. They're among the dirtiest players in the game. Their associations are your red flag. If you like flip flops and want to own a store contact an importer and buy direct. Find a nearby strip mall and negotiate a lease. Give yourself a chance to succeed.
Where's the good franchising cheer squad? by Bob Frankman
Bob Frankman's picture

This crowd is hard to please. Experts and franwhack specialists have been begging for earnings claims, more franchise disclosure document transparency, corporate stores, officers who own stores, operation economics, no hidden rebates, straight-forward royalties, transparent ad fund rates, the ability to listen, a frank public discussion of the investment, etc.

Then when it comes there is hardly a peep.

I'm not a flip-flop guy but I wish this company well in its new concept. I laud it for raising the bar for new franchisors to follow. Wish that more would follow their example.

Re: cheering squad and straight talk by Nick Bibby
Nick Bibby's picture
Fellas, I am a great fan of creativity, especially as it applies to franchise success. I don't see all negatives regarding concept introductions. Rather, I see questioning - for the most part - considering the number of franchises discussed here. I want all good concepts to succeed, but I also want to react to the facts as I see them, not simply wave at the armada as it sails by. I've done my cursory study from franchise fee value to expected current levels of profitability (as much as time spent and resources allowed given general 'shoe' industry standards). My analysis cannot be terribly accurate because I am not privy to a great deal of insider information, but I see enough to present questions to an investor client; none of which is a slam on the staff or the concept that might be an opportunity for the right investor. When working with a prospective franchisee, my job is to ask questions. It's not personal, it's simply part of an investigation and the client makes the decision, not me. I'd be asking questions and evaluating answers. I wish all franchisors well, especially those sensitive to the elements of quality franchising, which these people appear to be. However, my questions are based on analyzing details of the disclosure documents. They do not emanate from an interview, the fine staff managing the business, or the concept potential. I'd be happy to share some of my questions and concerns (that would be a part of my type of due diligence). Have you done your own homework yet? franchise consultant and a program developer dedicated to excellence in entrepreneurship. 


Nick Bibby founded BibbyGroup.com, an organization dedicated to franchise and entrepreneurial excellence.
 
Flip Flops & Straight Talk by Guest
I'm with Richard Solomon, Franchise Remedies, on this one. Fran Whack is never wrong. Just wanted to ask Nick Bibby if he thinks we are returning to "the blue suede shoe" days that existed pre FTC Rule, and that he implied were cleaned up by the FTC Rule on the All-Business Podcast ---or did I misunderstand? What is the difference between the "blue suede shoe fraud" we saw pre FTC Rule, and the fraud that exists today? Obviously, in my opinion, the fraud we see today is committed under cover of federal and state government regulation, the FDD, is it not? Richard Solomon indicates in his excellent tutorial "Franchise and Business Opportunity Fraud" that can be read on his website, Franchise Remedies, that, in part reads: "Franchising and business opportunities have had their very bright success stories. They were always rare. They are even more rare now. There is a saturation of concepts such that most offerings are just knock offs of concepts that may be found all over the place---------------------------------Today around eighty percent of new franchisors fail" ------------ I know you are NOT a broker, Nick Bibby, and that you work for the client only, but, as you say, "you are not privy to a great deal of insider information" and that your "analysis can't be terribly accurate" etc. which means that you do your due diligence work for the client on the Franchise Disclosure Document to the best of your ability, et..but the disclosure document isn't very helpful, or what? Carol Cross
FlipFlop they sell, straighttalk they speak(Yoda on franchising) by Paul Steinberg
Paul Steinberg's picture

Bob Frankman is entirely correct.

It is easy to bitch and moan. As the old newspaper aphorism goes: "If it bleeds, it leads."

I agree that this company is doing everything a "fair franchising" advocate would want, and then some.

While I am skeptical of the sole-product offering (pun intended), that is a business model issue. And as the zor points out, several such boutiques have succeeded.

This reflexive griping about each and every zor which is specifically mentioned undermines credibility when we get to cases of genuine abuse.

Paul Steinberg
Franchisee Attorney, New York City, Ph: 212-529-5400


Paul Steinberg, Franchisee Attorney, New York City, Ph: 212-529-5400
True Paul, by Howard R. Morrill
but abuse isn't the only issue. The economic proposition is simple: the franchisor must be offering enough value that it more than compensates the franchisee for the higher costs asociated with being a franchisee. I am willing to concede that the franchisor may prevent the franchisee from making some errors and may provide some useful education. But it appears to me that the middle of the road franchisee will pay $150,000 to $200,000 in initial and continuing franchise fees alone over the initial ten year term. Is there really that much value in what this franchisor has to sell? If so, where is that value? After a year or so of operating such a store, won't an independent operator pretty much know how to operate a retail flip-flop business? Won't he be operating a lot leaner than his franchisee competitors?
Sometimes leaner isn't good by Darnelle White
Darnelle White's picture
Howard writes, "Is there really that much value in what this franchisor has to sell? If so, where is that value?"
It depends. I wonder what flip-flop maker's LAMP is? One example among many is that often they do not have resources to sell, visit or train small independent accounts. The footwear industry tends to give high-end products as well as some customized products to strategic retail accounts. Small shops cannot receive these. Have any idea how the high-end flip flop market works?
Howard writes, "After a year or so of operating such a store, won't an independent operator pretty much know how to operate a retail flip-flop business?"
Not necessarily. Besides LAMP and other benefits, franchisors who operate company units and strong collaborative mechanisms have an advantage on CIP. Franchisors with concept shops have an even bigger advantage.
Paul writes; 'This reflexive by Ray Borradale
Ray Borradale's picture

Paul writes; 'This reflexive griping about each and every zor which is specifically mentioned undermines credibility when we get to cases of genuine abuse.'

Bob and Paul are right.

I bitch about franchising and yet I work for a franchisor who knows exactly how much I bitch - would you think I could stay employed if there weren't some bloody good franchising. I know of many. And I want the credibility to pursue the bastards in franchising. Good franchising structure and relationships show 'genuine abuse' systems to be dumb business in the long term.

But don't bring this one to Australia - most households have more flip flops [thongs] and sandals then they wear.

The more things change; the more they stay the same.

No Flip Flop success this time around by Nick Bibby
Nick Bibby's picture
Having spent time working in my grandfather's shoe factory (Lynn Novelty Shoe - supplying penny-loafers to the old 5&10's), I can attest to the fierce competitiveness of the foot ware industry. Not only would I shy away from this type of investment, but in today's economy I would run. One fine point that I always find interesting when key management personnel provide interviews: the costs always seem to be lower than legally disclosed. In this case Mr. Kraetsch tells us that the outside cost is $175K, but his most current FDD shows a high end of $245K. Funny how sales types always filter sunlight to their advantage.

--

Nick Bibby is an international franchise consultant and a program developer dedicated to excellence in entrepreneurship. 


Nick Bibby founded BibbyGroup.com, an organization dedicated to franchise and entrepreneurial excellence.
 
My Experience with Flip-Flops by Don Sniegowski
Don Sniegowski's picture

I spent a number of years growing up in Hawaii and always wondered when the Mainland would catch on to wearing slippers. I saw with my own two eyes the growth from cheap plastic slippers to Scott brand flip-flops. Twenty to thirty years ago, Hawaii was the only place that I remember having specialized zori or slipper shops, stocked with high-end flip-flops.

In college i spent a semester close to family in Hawaii - to decompress after a stint in Asia. I remember traveling for over an hour to Ala Moana Shopping Center on the weekend just to buy premier flip-flops at a flip-flop specialty store. I really liked unshackling the confinement of shoes in favor of open toes. And I was willing to pay a premium for comfort and durability - even as a poor college kid.

Later at Nike, I saw a similar zeal with urban kids and their athletic shoes - sometimes amplified to the extent that they would spend their week's paycheck on the latest pair of Air Jordan. The marketing department had the buying patterns down to an art and science. There were urban hot spots that we knew set the trend in color, pattern and shoe type for the huge suburban population. If lime green was in, we knew it first. There was an army of store trainers that Nike employed to educate the store staff of The Athlete's Foot, Foot Locker and others on the ins and outs of the industry and the products. It was said that these trainers knew Nike retail both forwards and backwards, so CEO Phil Knight decided to call them EKINS, which is Nike spelled backwards.

Ah, fond memories.

Disturbing images on BMM by ToeJam
"I really liked unshackling the confinement of shoes in favor of open toes." Oh no. Is Don Sniegowski also going to post a pic of his chubby legs and gnarled toes? The FTC needs to make nekkid toe display by zors a prohibited practice before this trend gets out of hand.
Thongs & Safety & those toes by Ray Borradale
Ray Borradale's picture

Perhaps these will help

The more things change; the more they stay the same.

Re: Thongs by Bob Frankman
Bob Frankman's picture
Australia has funny looking thongs. They look more like flip flops than something sold in Victoria Secret. I can't quite figure how to wear it. The straps look a little small to slip my legs through.
Bob don't call them thongs anymore by Barbara Jorgensen
Barbara Jorgensen's picture
Thongs are now known as women's or men's underwear.  I got corrected by some teenagers.  Let's just call them flip flops. 
Flip Flops & Thongs by Ray Borradale
Ray Borradale's picture
In Australia we were calling them thongs long before your 'thongs' were invented [at least in Western cultures]. We call 'thongs' "G-strings" - the 'G' stands for 'Geeee they look good' or 'Geeee they look uncomforable' or "Geesus, how much did they cost?'. Flip flops sounds a little like something that would be cured with viagra.

The more things change; the more they stay the same.

Gurantees by michael webster
michael webster's picture

Darin Kraetsch says "You have to always keep your finger on the pulse of unit economics. It can look good. It can taste good. It can feel good. But if the unit economics do not work, the franchise system will not work. First and foremost, this management team has a clear understanding of unit economics. We are setting up franchisees in places where unit economics will work."

Well, the franchise system has a standard unlimited time guarantee.  So it will be cold comfort to the franchisee who unit economics won't work.   They will be still on the hook for rent for the term.

Michael Webster, a franchisee attorney in Toronto, Ontario, publishes a website on business opportunities and franchises called "The BizOp News"


Michael Webster, a franchisee attorney in Toronto, Ontario, publishes a website on business opportunities and franchises called "The BizOp News"


No Guarantees by Guest
I think Webster is making the point that this is kind of Mr. Kraetsch to think this way but the reality is that a franchise system can have 100% franchisee failure within 5 years and yet the franchise network can continue on. I'm not sure I buy into franchisors having "unlimited time guarantee". I can't think of any business format franchise system older than a hundred years. It's even hard to name some older than fifty.
In a perfect world by Paul Steinberg
Paul Steinberg's picture

All true. But...

Flip Flop gives an Item 19 (which very few zors do), has said it will give the rebates back, and promptly given a public interview to discuss concerns raised in the media.

Any business relationship relies on a certain degree of trust, and franchising is notoriously susceptible to zor overrreaching. In evaluating Flip Flop against its peer group of new franchise systems, we should acknowlege that it is doing better than most.

If we are to criticize, we must take into account the current state of franchising. What specific steps have other zors taken which could be applicable to Flip Flop Shops?

Paul Steinberg
Franchisee Attorney, New York City, Ph: 212-529-5400


Paul Steinberg, Franchisee Attorney, New York City, Ph: 212-529-5400
This is still a FranWhack! by RichardSolomon
RichardSolomon's picture
This deal is poison, start to finish. Kickbacks refusal is just lipstick on a pig.

--

Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School


Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
How do you get the pig to stand still? by Paul Steinberg
Paul Steinberg's picture

Solomon has made several recent references to putting lipstick on a pig.

Is this a way to pass those drunken nights on the west Texas plains, or a Sarah Palin fixation?

Paul Steinberg
Franchisee Attorney, New York City, Ph: 212-529-5400


Paul Steinberg, Franchisee Attorney, New York City, Ph: 212-529-5400
There's nothing else to do in west TEXAS by RichardSolomon
RichardSolomon's picture
This deal is a total disaster in the making. No metaphor I could use wouls be inapppropriate. As for yur references to Sarah Palin, may I remind you that you still haven't provided a picture of your hot sister.

--

Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School


Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
Texans Don't Like White Meat by Bob Frankman
Bob Frankman's picture

Nothing wrong with lipstick on a pig if I'm in the mood for pork.

This is the kind of transparency that at least I can determine if I have a pig as opposed to turkey. I get really upset when my butcher sells me turkey as pork, or tries to convince me that Sarah Palin is Ronald Reagan.

As anyone with market savvy would already have figured out, by RichardSolomon
RichardSolomon's picture
the apparent demand for "designer" higher priced sandals and flip flops already has department stores stocking them. They are just another item anyone can shop while shopping for other things in a multi department store. If they are really hot, they will be footballed as traffic builders. Department store chains can obtain any hot design that the bozo franchise can obtain, and the department stores don't have to pay royalties, advert fees and initial franchise fees for the right to stock and sell them. As FranWhack predicted, this is turning into a real crapola franchise deal in an extremely short period of time. There can be no such thing as a fair franchise agreement if the deal sucks as a business model. If you don't vet the business model, telling an investor that the contract is fair as far as franchise agreements go is really not what an investor needs or wants. The contract for this piece of crap franchise is for ten years. The franchisees will be broke in 24 months trying to sell only this product category at prices necessary to come out financially against department storees and discount houses. No lawyer should ever favorably comment on the terms of any agreement if the deal sucks, as this one surely does. There is absolutely no difference between this junk franchise and the Soup Man franchise that fleeced those stupid investors a year or two ago. Any scoundrel can come up with a "concept"; write a marketing plan for it - total fiction - and sell it to FranWad investors. This is the plague I have been ranting about all these years.

--

Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School


Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
Flip Flop market research by Darnelle White
Darnelle White's picture
Here's some interesting marketing insights into Flip Flops. It's a description of the market from Peche Blu, makers of luxury flip flops.
As fashion has moved in the direction of more casual-wear, footwear has also changed, driven by innovative and colorful athletic shoe design led by Nike, Reebok, Adidas and Puma. Fashion has been the key market driver for footwear. Over the past few years, footwear has become a major fashion item – not just a complementary product to clothing. Color, patterns, fabrics and styles have become much more adventurous and styles change more frequently. Black is no longer the predominant footwear color – indeed from an 80% participation level in 1999, black has fallen to around 30%.6 It is difficult to find accurate statistics on the size of the flip-flop market in the US. Currently, the US market for footwear is $45 billion7 and the US market for flip-flops is estimated at $2 billion retail. The vast majority of these are basic flip flops priced below $50 per pair. The market size for high end flip flops is estimated to be some 10% of the overall market – or some 20 million pairs per year. To give perspective on the overall size of the flip-flop market: the US population is currently 296 million. If the bulk of flip-flop purchases are made by those between the ages of 5 and 50, this is roughly a consumer population of 200 million. Assuming that this group on average buys one pair of flip-flops every year (some own none; others purchase multiple pairs), this suggests a base annual US market of 200 million pairs. Since the US flip-flop market is estimated at $2 billion, this provides an average retail price of some $10 per pair, which seems reasonable and takes into account everything from $5 Wal-Mart specials to designer Gucci’s at over $200. This estimated market also ties with reports that Havaianas, which exports over 20 million pairs per year, is the largest branded producer with market share of 6% to 10%. In addition to the above numbers, it is also estimated that there are millions of pairs of cheaper flip flops produced for sale at less than $5 per pair.
When considering up and coming concepts, having access to the latest industry research is critical in determining what looks like it has staying power. Buyers shouldn't just rely on summaries given by franchise salespersons, candid attorneys, or franchise generalists. It's worth the investment to buy solid research on the subject. It is easy to miss new opportunities. Most people won't appreciate them until they have become giant chains with considerably less opportunity but also less risk.
?? by Scott S13
Mr Soloman, you keep saying this franchise concept is not going to work using such wonderful legal terms as "piece of crap" and "bozo" and "sucks"....but yet the only thing you point out is that you don't think it will work cause it only sells sandals and flip flops. This is a personal opinion and not a legal one which would be perfectly fine, but you ADVERTISE yourself as a lawyer on this site. You're a salesman just like the people you criticize in this article. If you posted something positive saying, "kudos for at least trying to put the best interests of your franchisees at the forefront," I would have never clicked on your link at the bottom of your posts, nobody would. It's a really sad world where the negative makes us take notice and the positive just gets lost in the fray. The first response is indicative of that. How else would you get people to go to your website which is a complete sales pitch right away with your "new" graphic everywhere. I use graphics like this when I sell stuff on ebay to get people's attention. I have never been to a website of a lawyer that had a counter on the bottom. Your website gives the impresion of a salesman first, a good ol' boy second, and a lawyer third. If there are legal items that should concern potential franchisees, please write them, but if you are going to advertise yourself as a lawyer and just post personal opinions, back them up with something relevant, not just your opinion. It's easy to say something will fail. It's really hard to say something will fail and then back it up.
It is positive thinking that gets many zees in trouble. by Barbara Jorgensen
Barbara Jorgensen's picture

I am positive there are bad people that will take any opportunity to lie, steal and cheat people of all they have.

I am positive that the lawyer's here know what they are talking about.

I am positive that most zors hide behind their FDD. 

I am positive that most zors use sales tecniques to get people to sign an agreement. (Misrepresentions, puffery, public figures, special studies, false earning claims and words in their FDD that can be misleading the zee wannabee.)

I am positive there are many ignorant people out there that will be hurt in the future.  They have been hurt in the past and present.  I am positive that BMM is where people will get the truth because of the lawyers

This is not negative talk.  Anything that protects you and your family is being very positive..

  

Crap by any other name! is still crap! by Guest
We, who read Blue Mau Mau, respect Richard Solomon's candor and opinion and his Fran Whacks are right on target. His colorful vocabulary in describing FranWhacks is refreshing and he doesn't hedge his opinion with legal niceties to cover his a..s! In this instance, he is indicating that the concept itself is a real loser and that any attorney who would check the actual franchise agreement would be remiss if he didn't warn his client that the concept itself was a loser.
Wrong source by Guest
Enough with the franwhack advertising already. Attorneys dishing out candid franchise investment advice?? What do they know about business? They should stick to the legal issues of the contract. What's next? Is my doctor going to candidly dish advice on what to avoid in bad footwear stock investments while he gives me a colonoscopy?
I just read a book about arbitration by Barbara Jorgensen
Barbara Jorgensen's picture
Richard is right and you are wrong. It is the FDD, the legal part that counts more than anything. That is what is discussed in court. Therefore people need to have someone like him discuss a franchise deal before they buy. Unfortunately there isn't more like him around.
Eat your heart out. Why should I or anyone else limit his by RichardSolomon
RichardSolomon's picture
capabilities of practice to fit your narrow agenda? I think, from the attitude you display, you may need more frequent colonoscopies.

--

Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School


Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
There are no positives in this deal - only negatives - and I by RichardSolomon
RichardSolomon's picture
won't try to spit shine turds to make bozo franchisor scoundrels happy. Too bad you don't like lawyers who can also analyze the business side of franchise offerings and call 'em for what they are. There are far more negatives to this flip flop crap than I have listed. You obviously would like to paper over the fatal flaws and promote this loser to investors. NOT ON MY WATCH! FORTGETABOUTIT!

--

Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School


Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
?? by Guest
Mr Soloman, you haven't listed any reasons why this will fail other than it only sells flip flops. That's the problem I have. Give us, the common folk who are obviously not up to the level of knowledge that you or the normal readers of this site possess, some facts.
why this will fail? what!? by Guest
Are you kidding me? ... Because it is brought to you by the same crowd that brought the Fran world - Cold Stone Creamery, Cereality, Wasabe Ginger Ice Cream, Vs Barbershops.
Watch the language please by Mr. Blue MauMau
Mr. Blue MauMau's picture

Please watch your language. It is understood that words like "crook" can be sarcastic and hyperbole, concepts protected under the law. But it also is a magic word that comes uncomfortably close to implying that someone served time -- and falsely stating such a thing is defamation. (If it is true that they are a convicted criminal, then there is no defamation.)

Please read our Posting Guidelines (listed below every page on this site).

Another thing to watch out for in some states is accusing a woman of losing their chastity. I kid you not.

Mr. Blue MauMau
Moderator

Flip-Flop Mentality by Guest
Obviously, the "Flip Flop" Mentality of the ?? above is what will permit the franchisor to sell this obviously flawed concept to others who will want to wear flip flops to work and to restaurants and to school and to church, etc.. A new era in footware is upon us. Society only has to hope that the display of bare feet and the careful washing of the feet become a ritual that will enrich the franchisor of the flip flop stores and those businesses who sell products to clean, deordorize, and to beautify the feet. Maybe special tatoos and studs will be developed expressly for the feet, and we will spend more time looking at each other's feet than each other's faces, and other body parts. The possibilities are endless!
Flip Flops See Major Growth by Darnelle White
Darnelle White's picture
Speaking of flip flop trends, according to NPD in 2006, the humble flip flop market grew in the U.S. by 100% each year from '02 - '06. This Balitmore Business Journal article talks about how more people are wearing designer flip flops to the OFFICE - imagine that.
[The flip flop] grip on office feet has tightened since last summer when designers began elevating the humble foot thong into a trendy item, outfitting it with sequins, jewels and even heels. As flip-flops have gotten fancier, so have the prices. Cupcake, a new boutique in Fells Point, sells flip-flops from $15 for a basic rubber pair to $115 for a pair of Mystique flip-flops. In the summer, flip-flops account for a quarter of shoe sales at Cupcake, store owner Lisa Schatz said. Though flip-flops have a toehold among women, some men have dug their feet into the fad. Sales of men's foot thongs in department stores have increased fourfold since 2002, according to NPD Research Inc., a market research firm in Port Washington, N.Y. Timothy Nelson, 26, owns four pairs, including a suede pair he can wear for dressy occasions. Nelson, who runs Baltimore opera troupe Ignoti Dei Opera, said flip-flops can easily be slipped on and off and are comfortable for someone working on stage for long periods.
Darnelle, you can flap the facts, but this is still a flop by Nick Bibby
Nick Bibby's picture
While the product itself may be gaining in scope, popularity, and cost, the quote you just presented is about floppy enthusiasts, departments stores and boutique shoe stores, not dedicated flop houses. But most importantly, in the case of the offering we're debating, the franchisor does not have what can be remotely called a 'sucessful system-wide model'. In fact, based on my preliminary study, only one store has been profitable, and even that store's sales are now down. I can't agree on this one.

Nick Bibby founded BibbyGroup.com, an organization dedicated to franchise and entrepreneurial excellence.
 
Flip floppy assumptions by Darnelle White
Darnelle White's picture
Nick Bibby writes, "the franchisor does not have what can be remotely called a 'successful system-wide model'."
We agree on this point: Six up and coming stores is still a SYSTEM of dreams. There is very little to show it SUCCESSFUL. New start-up franchise systems are the riskiest. If you had to choose between a start-up franchise in a mature, slowly growing sector or in a new uncertain sector that was growing quickly for the past few years, which would you choose?
Which one would I choose, Darnelle? by Nick Bibby
Nick Bibby's picture
I'd place my bet on the first peanut shell, not the latter with a great big 'maybe' in front of it. However, my start-up in the 'mature' sector - am I speaking of myself in total here? - would be based on solid demographics backing up prior successes, as well as a location that had yet to be serviced.

Nick Bibby founded BibbyGroup.com, an organization dedicated to franchise and entrepreneurial excellence.
 
I would choose that one too, Nick by Darnelle White
Darnelle White's picture
Yes. In picking start-up franchise concepts, that would be my choice too -- to pick a start-up franchise system that has some kind of a hook in service and location within a large and mature retail sector. That's the safer thing to do.
Don't diss readers by Guest
"Give us, the common folk who are obviously not up to the level of knowledge that you or the normal readers of this site possess, some facts." Don't lump everyone together. I'm a reader. I'm not a lawyer, an accountant or a CFO. I'm just part of the common folk class. Reader #251,232
?? by Guest
I apologize, I meant no disrespect
?? by Guest
or is that something I have to pay you for.
Be sure and tell Mr Biglari I said hello by RichardSolomon
RichardSolomon's picture
unless, of course, you are Mr Biglari

--

Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School


Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
Flip Flop trends by Darnelle White
Darnelle White's picture
Richard, When you give regards to Mr. Bigliari, can you have him pick me up a pair of $42 "Married to the Mob" flip flops that are so trendy? There's also a pair of $400 PêchePlatinum crocodile flip flops but that's out of my budget. Here's a glimpse of them though:
PêchePlatinum uses PêcheBlu's patent pending ultra-sports shoe base with hand-matched crocodile straps for magnificent comfort. These ultimate flip flops are for those who want to express their individuality in a world of mass production.
Sadly, you won't be able to get these at the local department store.
If you think that wanting an expensive pair of flip flops by RichardSolomon
RichardSolomon's picture
is a reason to invest in a flip flop franchise, or that any "look" won't be ripped off and sold on Harwin Street's Asian market, then you are not ready for prime time.

--

Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School


Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
?? by Guest
Who is Mr. Biglari?? I am in no way shape or form affiliated with with this franchise or any franchise. I don't have enought money to buy one, but one day I would like to own one, hence the interest. I am someone who loves flip flops and recently bought some from a Flip Flop Shops in California and think this is a great concept. I found this article by looking up Flip Flop Shops in google and this link is toward the bottom of the page. I am just someone who is sick of people who think that their reputation allows them to make comments and invoke trust without any facts to back them up. That is a dangerous way of shaping and forming opinions. Ask the Madoff investors about that one. Mr. Salomon, you have responded to my posts, but I still see no facts that shape your opinion. It's not that hard.
Re: ?? by Guest
I don't know the first thing about franchising. I don't have enough money to buy a franchise, but I recently visited a flip flop shops in California and found it quite unique. I love flip flops and will be the first to admit I'm biased toward any concept that makes me happy. I just have a problem with people offering opinions based on what, I don't know. Let us know
This has got to be the by Ray Borradale
Ray Borradale's picture

dumbest thread I have read at BMM. Are people actually suggesting this concept is worth investing in? While I expect rents for these outlets to be necessarily high at least wage costs will be down. I can see a lonely franchisee standing amidst $40,000 worth of stock and an expensive shop fit-out while the occasional passer-by walks in and walks out.

The expensive marks will be very few and very far between so the market will rely on those who want to buy something casual or simply something for around the house. As Richard said earlier; the competition is massive where the competitors can rely on the smaller margins of many product lines to carry the business.

You can buy them anywhere from gas stations to department stores and boutiques; all with smaller margins that would be by far the biggest problem that would face any idiot that signed up.  Manufacturing costs for the biggest market products in this concept are low and everything gets copied now.

Look at the copied tourist and sports crap out there.  Look to school bags - crap everywhere.  Look to clothing - cheap crap everywhere sells and while that doesn't mean there isn't a market for quality - the 'cream' has gone.  Boutiques survive because of a range of products and lines from belts to jewellery. And they work for the landlord.

Many speciality shoe stores have folded because, in part, the schoolie market was taken over by department stores.  Seriously; this thread and this concept .... nuts.

The more things change; the more they stay the same.

Flip floppy assumptions by Darnelle White
Darnelle White's picture
You can buy cheap flip flops here as well - from convenience stores to department stores. I disagree that boutiques only work because of their range of products and lines from belts to jewelry. Specialty retail outlets are a fact of life. They do one thing and they do it well. It's about time Australia's Yuppies had access to nicer flip flops than the cheap stuff, don't you think?
There is no such thing as an Australian yuppie. They are still by RichardSolomon
RichardSolomon's picture
culturally about 75 years from yuppiedom.

--

Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School


Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
You gotta be joking by Ray Borradale
Ray Borradale's picture
Australians have been able to buy pretty ones for 15 years at least.  And Richard; we do have yuppies and they have been coming and going for more than 20 years.  It is sorta like bad franchising - sooner or later they have to pay the piper and the next generation of yuppie appears.  And I believe they do wear thongs - not flip flops - thongs - G strings on backwards at the beach isn't a good look boys..  And the rash was painful ...

The more things change; the more they stay the same.

I love Australians and despise yuppies. I had hoped that by RichardSolomon
RichardSolomon's picture
Australia might be spared those vaccuous simpering nerd personalities.

--

Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School


Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
High-end Flip Flops Growing in Australia by Darnelle White
Darnelle White's picture
It looks like Havaianas flip flops are becoming chic in Australia.
Yes, Ray but STUFF and CRAP by Guest
appears to be what governments depend upon in retail franchising to stimulate the economy! We are saturated with crap and stuff imported from all over the world and saturated with QSR and Restaurants, and specialty shops of all kinds. Demand is not infinite but supply is treated as infinite and the saturation of credit is just overlooked and we are told that the solution is more small businesses that will offer more crap and stuff. Apparently, governments and their institutions that support small business as the life blood of economies only care about sustained activity and revenue and the unsustainability of the franchisees is not a concern for them, as long as the franchisors are sustained and produce activity in the economy as long as possible.
And so is born by Ray Borradale
Ray Borradale's picture

flip-flop franchises and Michael's recylicable 'coat hanger' franchise.  So we have these silly concepts come and go and the money turns [churns] and Small Business Ministers are happy to support the aftermath and play the 'three monkeys'. 

Government apathy, stupid concepts or good concepts with stupid franchisors, and those that buy into them drive the need to educate people about risk assessment and promote the failures while evil promotes the subliminal or blatant 'guaranteed success' crapola.  Governments only respond to embarrassment but more $s buy bigger, over-riding noise and media protects the bucks.

The more things change; the more they stay the same.

Franchise Logos by BJ
If you believe a franchise logo should make it onto our website about Australian Franchise Lies please send an email or comment. Thanks. brad@cheesecakeshoplies.com
What franchises well? by Darnelle White
Darnelle White's picture
Ray and Richard at the gut level think flip flop shops are a dumb franchise idea. I think Ray doesn't like it because the Flip Flop Shops is a retail pioneer as opposed to a copy cat franchise system. (I'm reading a lot in between the lines of his postings.) This brings up a larger issue: 1. What business concepts work well to franchise? Why? 2. How specialized can a specialty retail store get? What is the natural development of such stores so that we can spot the trend?
Almost any concept would work well if the franchisor has by RichardSolomon
RichardSolomon's picture
first proved up its profitability in a financial model that has to carry all the expenses of the franchise relationship; and if the contract reflects the realities of the proposition. To put a ten year term on a short life cycle concept that has an expectancy of maybe two years; not have termination rights when the concept loses its prospects; restrict future franchisee activity if the concept fails as a franchised model; fail to recognize the transient popularity of fad products; not have a life expectancy long enough for the franchisees to recoup their total initial investment; are all fatal flaws in what might be a good idea in another business model that is real.

--

Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School


Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
Experiment and fail by Ray Borradale
Ray Borradale's picture

Totally agree with Richard but I would make one point on the second question.

"How specialized can a specialty retail store get?"

You can experiment with almost anything in a retail environment if you believe you can make a dollar - it only gets ugly when there are long term contracts and there is other people's money involved and you were wrong. 

An independant operator can often run away without too much damage if he/she has negotiated a short term lease, the concept wasn't totally stupid and he/she minimised his/her risk going in the door.

Is that what we have here; a franchisor experiment with other people's money?  The 60's would have been the time for thousands of these brilliant concepts - plenty of dope, stupid ideas and people that didn't have a clue about what was going on around them.  Hang on; what has changed?

The more things change; the more they stay the same.

Payoffs if you are right by Guest
RB: Is that what we have here; a franchisor experiment with other people's money? ANSWER: With two or three company owned stores in a six store chain, the system is too small to say that yet. Besides, the CEO has already said that he put his money where his mouth is and so did the founder in their own stores. RB: The 60's would have been the time for thousands of these brilliant concepts - plenty of dope, stupid ideas and people that didn't have a clue about what was going on around them. ANSWER: No. Flip flops is not a hippie phenomenon. And even if you were correct in that flip flop purchases are a function of dope, stupid ideas and people, I remind you that the market now is even bigger since dope, stupidity and people are way more abundant in 2009. The responses in here reminds me of the response my grandfather gave me when I told him about this neat new Apple II personal computer. "A computer that they want me and you to buy?" he replied. He simply summarized, "How useless." Let's have some coherent retail reasoning. Put your business caps on, please.
Business caps by Ray Borradale
Ray Borradale's picture

Firstly do you disagree with this?;

“You can experiment with almost anything in a retail environment if you believe you can make a dollar - it only gets ugly when there are long term contracts and there is other people's money involved and you were wrong.

An independent operator can often run away without too much damage if he/she has negotiated a short term lease, the concept wasn't totally stupid and he/she minimised his/her risk going in the door.”

I apologise that my 60’s remark suggested that I believed that flip-flops came into production then. That was not my intention; frivolous and I missed my mark.

However if you disagree with my inserted comments from my previous response then you have money invested in this thing. You have considered those comments only in the narrower context and not considered the broader intent regarding the potential danger of many stupid ideas carried by franchisee risk. You took it personally. Seriously though; you have 6 but what is the target.

You just keep hammering away here until the first generation rolls through. The 'business cap' remark was very good. Nice attempt to fend.

The more things change; the more they stay the same.

Partly agree by Guest
RB: “You can experiment with almost anything in a retail environment if you believe you can make a dollar - it only gets ugly when there are long term contracts and there is other people's money involved and you were wrong. RESPONSE: Yes. I agree with that statement. RB: An independent operator can often run away without too much damage if he/she has negotiated a short term lease, the concept wasn't totally stupid and he/she minimised his/her risk going in the door.” RESPONSE: That's a lot of 'Ifs'. If an independent operator fails, they often have long-term leases and angry creditors pursuing their money even in bankruptcy. An independent operator can run away if they use their own money and pay their bills.
Totally agree by Ray Borradale
Ray Borradale's picture

but a smart operator getting into this type of gamble would not sign a long-term lease and would minimise their exposure - bankruptcy would be seen as one likely outcome and would be avoided.  Going into business is always a calculated gamble but this one reeks of chasing franchisee investors to simply get into the business of franchise royalty.  Or has someone been passionate about flip-flops all their life?  Do we have a fetish here?

Sooner or later this business is going to wake up to having minimal traffic.  I might drive across town to an art galley and my wife might travel for a particular clothes designer but who is going to drive past a hundred other suppliers to buy a pair of flip-flops?  There will be a need to expand the product range.  Having just put on my business cap could I suggest hats, caps, sun glasses and Brazillians to start with.  I'm sure something there will create more traffic.

The more things change; the more they stay the same.

A fad? by Darnelle White
Darnelle White's picture
Solomon writes about recognizing bad franchise concepts, ". . . fail to recognize the transient popularity of fad products"
Are flip flops a fad?
Expensive flip flops are a fad. by RichardSolomon
RichardSolomon's picture
What I buy at WalMart for $ 4 is not in the same market segment as the expensive flip flops. High priced flip flops are a fad. They are a fad because designer anything has a short life cycle. They are a fad for the additional reason that they will be knocked off, and the high priced flip flops are more than fad like in their prospects.

--

Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School


Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
Uninformed about flip flops by Guest
I thought high end flip flops have been around since at least the late 50s. According to the above post, because Gucci and Louis Vuitton are designer products they can only have a short-term life. Gucci, Louis Vuitton, Adidas, Nike and others also can only have short-term retail stores because Asian factories will shortly replace them by making cheap knock offs. LOL!
Listen up, Fool. Vuitton, Gucci and the others spend millions a by RichardSolomon
RichardSolomon's picture
year on armies of investigators and lawyers tracking down counterfewiters. What the knock off folks do with them is take their UNIQUE LOOK AND THEIR NAME. If you can't see the difference, go buy yourself a flip flop franchise and you can laugh out of the other side of your mouth in about 18 months. On the other hand, you are almost certainly a shill for this boozo franchisor who would knowingly misrepresent that the flip flop franchise is something like a Gucci or a Vuitton opportunity.

--

Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School


Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
I'm waiting for an informed answer by Guest
Havaianas, Scott and other premium flip flop designers and makers have been around since '62 and before. Any ideas what the makers have been doing to successfully dampen parallel goods for almost 5 decades? I am no shill. And you are no retailer or businessman.
Here's your answer by RichardSolomon
RichardSolomon's picture
Designers have no investment in retail operations for the most part - there are some exceptions that are not relevant to this discussion. When a design loses popularity, designers stop selling them and move on, constantly producing new designs. Designers are not franchisors (again with few exceptions), and they make money because they don't have investments as anyone's franchisee. DUH!

--

Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School


Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
Don't forget May 2nd by RichardSolomon
RichardSolomon's picture
May 2nd is the second monthly Franchise Forum at Muldoon's in Houston. See my web site's Happy Hour announcement for the address. There are no limits on subjects, and no charge for attendance. All you do is pay for your own drinks. Oh, and, by the way - I want to thank the bozos from the flip flop franchise for insisting that I continue to discuss as many of their shortcomings as I may think of. Please feel free to ask me to point out more specific instances of why your flip flop franchise is worse than a Dog Poo franchise. Yes sir - you can be more shytey than a mighty shytey franchise - and you win this week's prize for crap investments.

--

Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School


Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
OOPS - It's April 2nd - Next Thursday at Muldoons in Houston by RichardSolomon
RichardSolomon's picture
Our fre form franchise forum is withour attendance charge, and the discussion goes wherever folks want it to go (within reason). See my website for location - Happy Hour with Richard Solomon and Seamus Muldoon

--

Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School


Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
What franchises well? by Darnelle White
Darnelle White's picture
Is franchising just a function of what has higher profit margins to afford such a relationship? In other words, should those industries with the highest profit margins such as pharmaceutical, medical equipment manufacturers and large oil engineering firms (with long project life cycles) be the first to franchise? How about banks (if we leave out our current banking crisis)?
From the get go by Ray Borradale
Ray Borradale's picture
In the past we have seen people develop 'unique' and often successful business concepts only to see them pushed out by competitors who see the value in a product or a concept. Here we begin a new phase where you wait for competition to be established and then begin your 'dream'. At least here you don't have to go through that drawn out process of watching the business slide; you get to watch it fail lift off while paying royalties. Sounds like a plan.

The more things change; the more they stay the same.

High end looking flip flops are already here on Harwin Drive in by RichardSolomon
RichardSolomon's picture
the Asian market where knock offs of everythng are always for sale. There is no way to protect flip flop designs, and they can be had on very short notice out of Asia. What bozos buy for over $ 100 can be roughly duplicated and sold on Harwin for $ 39 or less. People will shop the high end stores and then go to the Asian knock off markets (substitute Mexican or any other culture you like - knock off markets are everywhere) and buy something similar for 65 % less. Department stores are already selling really good looking flip flops and sandals for $ 40 here. The bloom will quickly come off the high priced flip flop business, and then - as per their franchise agreement - this franchisor can put a Pingo Fucosi cheap flip flop store right across the street from the stores of its franchisees that have the highest sales. Would they do this? Think of the Yankee Candle model - same concept and same tactics for their so called exclusive dealers. This franchisor's contract also permits it to sell on the Internet. Customers can use franchised stores as try on locations and buy on line from the franchisor who will most certainly be cutting price as the novelty wears off on high end flip flops and they can't be sold at high retail prices. And that aint all, folks. I could go on for hours. A lot of my practice is in the fashion industry, and I see all these performance events every month in some segment of the fashion business.

--

Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School


Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com,  has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
Failed Stores by Guest
I'm a business broker and these clowns tried to talk me in to selling 2 up and running locations in high traffic malls. I asked them how much money they were making and they said making money no these things are losing about 30k each a year. I said ok well I have a hard enough time selling businesses that make money I don't need any that lose money. Needless to say margins were only 30% then you factor in a Royalty on the total, now your down to a 20% margin. Then you have the mall rent at 10k. Have to sell a lot of flip flops to cover that nut anyway stay away far away.
How high was your broker fee? by Guest
The guy that spoke with you looks like he was going overboard in trying to low ball your expectations. After all, 30% product margin is way too thin to support such a store. I wonder who would tell you that all the stores were unprofitable? That's got to be the gloomiest and yet the most honest franchise developer since the annals of recorded history. Even his CEO confirmed in his interview that at least one shop, his shop, has been profitable. It almost sounds like the guy is trying to get rid of you. By any chance were you pestering him to let you sell their franchises at sky-high commissions?
Flip Flops, limited market by John Power
John Power's picture
I would be concerned that the Flip Flop market is too limited to be a sustainable franchise program. This is likely to lead to a large number of unhappy franchiseees. I don't have a problem with franchisors receiving rebates. Of course it must be properly disclosed in the FDD, but if the franchisor can negotiate sufficient savings it can be win-win for the franchiee and franchisor. This depends on the industry, amount of discount that can be negotiated, etc., though. John Power Biltmore Franchise Consulting
John Power Biltmore Franchise Consulting

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Notifications