Obama Pushes Small Biz and Health Care Relief
WASHINGTON, D.C. - President Barack Obama discussed the economy and the condition of small businesses in his first State of the Union address given to a joint session of Congress Wednesday night. “We cut taxes for small businesses,” he declared early on in his speech.
The President then told Congress that economic growth should be further stimulated by eliminating all capital gains taxes on small business investments, and by providing a tax incentive for all small businesses that invest in new plants and equipment.
Matthew Shay, CEO of the International Franchise Association, thinks tax relief is a good thing for America’s franchises. “We support the President’s call for targeted tax relief for new investment in small businesses,” he declared Thursday morning.
Dawn Sweeney, the CEO of the National Restaurant Association, representing the restaurant and food industries, agrees. He thought the president’s tax proposals as a positive move to help the nation’s restaurants. “We support the President’s call for tax incentives to help spur the economy and generate additional jobs, including the extension of expired provisions that allow businesses an enhanced deduction for expensing and ‘bonus’ depreciation for capital expenditures,” said Sweeney. “This will encourage restaurants to invest and create jobs. A tax credit for new hires will further encourage restaurateurs to hire additional workers.”
President Obama declared that one of the largest problems for small businesses has been accessing loans and capital. “Even though banks on Wall Street are lending again, they're mostly lending to bigger companies,” the President told Congress. “Financing remains difficult for small business owners across the country, even those that are making a profit.”
The President proposed taking $30 billion of the TARP bailout money that Wall Street banks have now paid back to the government and use it to help community banks give small businesses the credit they need to stay afloat. “I'm also proposing a new small business tax credit -– one that will go to over one million small businesses who hire new workers or raise wages,” he said.
The NRA responded that the proposal by the president was an excellent idea. “During these challenging economic times, restaurants – many of which are small businesses – continue to have difficulty securing access to credit,” he replied. “We are encouraged by the President's proposal to allow a portion of unspent TARP money to be used to directly support small business lending. His call for a continued elimination of fees and continued increase in guarantees for SBA loans through 2010 would help restaurant businesses secure access to credit.”
The IFA agrees that such measures will help franchise chains as well. Shay says that franchise businesses have been severely impacted by the lack of access to credit, which was down 40 percent in 2009. He recommends Congress immediately to put the direction that the president wants to go by raising the SBA 7(a) loan program limit from $2 million to $5 million will help to create between 450,000 and 650,000 new jobs.
“Now is the time to put that support into action,” Shay declared.
The President went on to say that there is a great need for health insurance reform to relieve heavy costs to middle-class families. Health care reform “would give small businesses and uninsured Americans a chance to choose an affordable health care plan in a competitive market,” he said. “It would require every insurance plan to cover preventive care.”
President Obama observed, “By the time I'm finished speaking tonight, more Americans will have lost their health insurance. Millions will lose it this year. Our deficit will grow. Premiums will go up. Patients will be denied the care they need. Small business owners will continue to drop coverage altogether." He then declared, "I will not walk away from these Americans, and neither should the people in this chamber.”
In a divided Congress, Democrats rose to their feet with applause, while Republicans observed quietly in their seats.
The IFA is less supportive of what it feels are rushed Senate and House bills. “If we are going to seriously consider meaningful healthcare reform and create jobs, cost containment is the place to begin,” said Shay. “It’s time to slow down the process and develop a bill that benefits everyone and avoids catastrophic consequences to our economy.”
Regarding the health care bill, the CEO of the National Restaurant Association stated, “it is essential to the restaurant industry that the protections added to the Senate version of this legislation be included if the Congress enacts any reform.”
The President concluded his State of the Union remarks, “Our administration has had some political setbacks this year, and some of them were deserved. But I wake up every day knowing that they are nothing compared to the setbacks that families all across this country have faced this year. And what keeps me going -– what keeps me fighting -– is that despite all these setbacks, that spirit of determination and optimism, that fundamental decency that has always been at the core of the American people, that lives on. It lives on in the struggling small business owner who wrote to me of his company, "None of us," he said, "…are willing to consider, even slightly, that we might fail."
In regard to health care and economic initiatives, the President ended his speech, “We don't quit. I don't quit.”
--
Related Reading:
Transcript of the 2010 State of the Union speech
- Franchise topic:
- Enter Your Own Tag:

business owners before the fall 2010 election:
http://www.resistnet.com/photo/obamopoly-3?xg_source=activity
Big banks in the US cutting back loans to small business:
The more things change; the more they stay the same.
So Obama is going to free up the loans to small businesses?
The Banking System Doesn’t Need More Money
As a small business owner with a lot of friends who also own small businesses, I get tired of hearing all the news stories about how small business lending is going to get a shot in the arm from President Obama’s programs or any other source in the foreseeable future. Yesterday I listened to a speaker from one of the large banks talk about how many loans the bank was making, doing its share to get the country moving again. All the banks are simply not making business loans unless they are absolutely gold-plated. Period. This isn’t because they don’t want to make loans; it’s because they’re being criticized by examiners.
The regulators have made it clear to banks that they will be criticized for any loan where the borrower takes out any cash, regardless of the underlying fundamentals or collateral. This is nonsensical.
I understand that real estate is depressed, and that values are uncertain, and that tenants are moving, and all the other fundamentals.
The answer is simple: The regulators need to relax—not on every loan, but use some common sense!
I feel for all the small businesses in America that are crippled. They dont understand why their debt free building isnt worth anything for collateral on a loan, or why their receivables which have deteriorated only slightly are now not worth anything as collateral.
Here’s the simple truth from one of the “little guys” in a small business who sees the misery here in the street, and just can’t relate to our government’s plan to put more money in the system. There is plenty of money out there; someone just needs to stop sitting on it, after the regulators tell them it’s ok to lend some with solid underwriting policies.
This story has been truncated, see the whole story at: http://www.mrmissionpossible.com/blog/auto-salvage-consulting/obamas-30-billion-small-business-plan-more-money-isnt-needed/
Ron Sturgeon
5940 Eden
Ft. Worth TX 76117
...it's to provide relief from mounting defaults small banks overwhelmingly underwrote in loans in the commercial real estate market. That's the current wave of collapse. The banks will 'lend' the money to commercial real estate owners to pay back their defaulting loans to those very banks.
No job creation in that formula.
Google 'small banks commercial real estate defaults' for eye opening insight.
Let's be honest here. Small businesses are followers. It is big business that sets the trends, and that dollar for dollar we get more hiring bang for the buck. Treat big business well and forget small businesses, including some 90% of franchisors and all franchisees. Confidence, investments and business will trickle down.
Now that big businesses are being carted away from intensive care, politicians feel free to mouth that small businesses are important and need capital. That is more a campaign ploy than an effort to save the economy. Small business owners cast a lot more votes than big business. But big business greases the wheels. Save CIT, and many, many franchise chains like Dunkin and others sigh a breath of relief.
This may be politically unpopular to hear, but if you want to save the economy, think trickle down, baby. Trickle down. Big business, Wall Street and banks first. Small businesses will follow. Forget franchisor lobbyist IFA, or the Nation's Restaurant Association. Forget Obama pushing small business efforts. Those are efforts to get votes. Instead, watch what the Chamber of Commerce or PriceWaterhouseCoopers (listed as one of the largest lobbyists) are supporting and doing.
The previous US president wasn’t all that welcome but that is expected to change this time around.
The more things change; the more they stay the same.
...please
Amen...and we'll send an allowance.
BUT ... we would gladly send you 5,000 Rudds, 300,000 Emersons and a few Swans. The outstanding balance over 2 years. Now that would be a fair swap ...
The general opinion here is that Rudd is to Obama as Excrement is to Shine. No one, least of all Rudd, expected him to win our last federal election.
Rudd is seen as a Pole Turtle;
He doesn’t belong up there,
No one knows how he got there,
He doesn’t know what he is doing up there,
No one will admit they put him up there,
Everyone is hoping he won’t be up there for much longer.
As far as small business goes his efforts have been dismal but he has made friends in big business.
The more things change; the more they stay the same.
Here is some good economic news. The real gross domestic product, the output of goods and services produced by labor and property located in the United States, increased at an annual rate of 5.7 percent in the fourth quarter of 2009. That's the highest growth since 2003. This bodes well for small businesses. I'm hearing a lot of pundits say that employment, a lagging indicator, follows growth by about a year to a year and a half.
The problem offsetting this positive news is the lack of bank loans that small businesses perceive is worsening (see chart below).
What do you think? Will the employment engine start kicking into high gear at the end of 2010 / first half of 2011?
Darnelle; how the hell is the average punter supposed to interpret all the differing media hype and speculation;
GDP surges 5.7pc to lift hopes for more jobs in US
Every country needs a strong economy and some will get it right and faster than others. I say 'Yes' as Aus typically follows the States and because we have no choice but to get positive. Being found wrong at a later date is OK because it ain't remembered.
The more things change; the more they stay the same.
You've just heard the President, the NRA and IFA leaders talk about how there is a huge cash flow problem from small businesses on Main Street. This chart gives you a sense of how big the problem is.
Can't wait for November 2010. This will go down as the most embarrassing presidential failure in the history of domestic policy.
And you should read up on how he's trying to pass legislation to force you to buy up gov't debt through your 401k...sneaky administration. Unfortunately, it made page 15 of Bloomberg and Business Week. It's prbably too incomprehensible for even the left wing media to grasp. Guess China is wising up so throw it on the taxpayer.
I thought it would take 2 years for him to expose himself as the communist he is.
The best thing he can do for health care reform is open up interstate competition plain and simply. The lack of competitive plans hurts small business...Obamacare is as much of a solution as bankrupt Medicare is.
The above comment is boring diatribe, even if it is from my own kind. Whoever is in the majority in 2011 will face the daunting wall of taking 60 senators to pass a bill. Good luck getting past gridlock.
To change the subject somewhat, I found this interactive map from the World Bank fascinating. Maybe others will too. (Hover the mouse over the country to see a country's 2008 annual growth in GDP)
Source: World Bank Data - Annual GDP Growth Rate
So what do you think? Should the U.S. be more like Belarus, China, Peru, Russia and Turkmenistan? Look at the hottest growth economy on the planet - Angola. That's the dark green country in the south of Africa. Smokin'!
I know. I know. Let's compare apples to apples. Developed to developed. Look at Australia's nice pace of growth.
Of course I looked at Australia’s GDP and after a moment of national pride I then went straight to China to check out its growth. How we interpret data can be misleading.
Australia has been busy selling off out country’s assets to mostly China for 30 years and so I cannot condemn our present government for that except to say our current PM has been probably more energetic than previous PMs. It beats working for a living but there is a long term cost.
At times when it gets tough we virtually ‘fire sale’ to get a buck not riding out tough times and not accepting that the well will run dry sooner or later.
Australia’s GDP growth will typically fall in behind China and sure it is influenced by the country's focus on 'controlled' population growth to meet increasing infrastructure costs that grow in line with our population growth and our need to ensure that 3% of the country prosper.
There may be a rationale to perhaps consider conservative growth as a strength in tough times. I’m not an economist and I’m not privy to government agenda but my moment of confidence has obviously been spoiled.
The more things change; the more they stay the same.
Where Australia's gdp is booming, your British commonwealth neighbor New Zealand is shrinking. Any thoughts on why Australia's economy is following China's while NZ's is not? Are the Chinese avoiding NZ's assets?
I cannot give a complete or necessarily accurate answer because I don’t believe I’m qualified or knowledgeable enough and there will be other influences I miss. I can give you the opinion of one distracted man with mostly eyes on what happens elsewhere.
NZ just doesn’t have the mineral assets that Australia has. It is a beautiful country and its greatest assets are its beauty and its people. Like most countries it has its mix of wonderful people and social misfits.
In my opinion, its economy driven often by poor governments, does not incentive its people and far, far too great a proportion leave the country to go to Australia where our entry and social benefits system and attitude to their influx allows them to work, get finance and virtually holiday while only needing to spend a few hundred dollars to go home and holiday with family before returning.
Many Australian’s would argue that the visitors do not become Australian assets but the reality is that for the most part they are here working while they are here.
That is generalizing but perhaps just far too often the way it is. NZ’s people assets have not been cultivated and Australia hasn’t helped. To be fair, NZ governments have not had a lot to work with and have attempted to promote their tourism but similar to franchising, every other country is out there claiming similar beauty which very often does not compare.
They have what could be termed the beginning of ugly social issues that need to be addressed and while they put in a lot of energy the reality is that most sentencing in NZ is unbelievably soft [I mean freakin soft]. I suspect that if they allow those problems to grow they will not cultivate repeat and referral tourism until they get real tough.
At the moment it is a comparatively safe destination compared to almost anywhere else in the world. Those who visit Australia are typically great workers and I have encountered many an energetic entrepreneurial mind. Some just come for the free money. Word spread a long time ago.
I am not in a position to say but others might suggest that those are the difference between those driven to leave and those who stay and are left to provide the impression tourists gain.
Legislation and a consequently hamstrung government do not get behind its small business and its small business needs to get more involved in maximizing the tourist dollar instead of mostly surviving.
A look at NZ parliament is a look into the past. Many of their politicians are full of ‘it’ obviously taking the lead of every other country where a people representative’s main focus is to stay in office. I don’t know that they have plan that they believe in.
Perhaps it would be better to get the opinion of a Kiwi to get some balance against this young man’s opinion.
Talk about getting off track; the short answer in my opinion - NZ just doesn't have the assets that China needs.
The more things change; the more they stay the same.
When we look at GDP growth comparisons with a poorer country before, during and following tough economic times we might consider what are all of the influences to that country’s GDP growth figure where their bank only opens on Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays.
The more things change; the more they stay the same.
into a discussion about healthcare and Obama isn't just boring, it's irrelevant.
I'm not your kind.
Post new comment