Daily News for Franchise & Small Biz Owners
share franchise news, to prosper and amuse
SYDNEY (Blue MauMau) - The Australian Senate Standing Committee on Economics heard from Professor Frank Zumbo at a public hearing into whether to apply a statutory definition of “unconscionable conduct” into Trade Practice Act 1974. While there were a number of speakers it appeared that all opinion, excluding the ACCC’s, conceded to the recommendations, either in part or in full, from Professor Zumbo.
The speakers on the day, except the ACCC, all agreed that the current section 51AC had not performed, the courts had not “strayed very far from a very narrow concept” and the ACCC had achieved virtually nothing with only two successful cases over 10 years.
Professor Zumbo is one of Australia’s leading academics and has been one of many at the forefront of arguing effectively to revamp the regulatory regime and law within the Australian franchising Inquiry.
On “unconscionable conduct”, Professor Zumbo has submitted that to add a clear definition on “unconscionable conduct” while necessary, probably won’t achieve much at all, rather, he has offered a full suite of 12 initiatives including a statutory duty of good faith, that appear to have broad support from the Committee chaired by Senator Hurley.
Professor Zumbo’s recommendations:
(1) Inserting a statutory definition of the term “unconscionable” into s 51AC of the Trade Practices Act;
(2) Inserting a statutory list of examples of the types of conduct that would ordinarily be considered to be “unconscionable” under s 51AC of the Trade Practices Act;
(3) Having only one prohibition against unconscionable conduct within the Trade Practices Act [instead of 3 unused – s 51AA, AB & AC] to cover both consumer transactions and business to business relationships involving small businesses;
(4) Expressly prohibiting bullying, intimidation, physical force, coercion or undue harassment in consumer transactions as well as business to business relationships involving small businesses;
(5) Enacting a statutory duty of good faith;
(6) Enacting a new legislative framework within the Trade Practices Act to deal with unfair contract terms in consumer transactions as well as in business to business transactions involving small businesses;
(7) Amending the Trade Practices Act to provide that the Court can issue a class compensation order whereby a Court would, once a breach has been found in an action brought by the ACCC, have the power to compensate affected consumers and small businesses without the need for those consumers and small businesses to bring their own action or recovery proceedings;
(8) Requiring that contractual documents be drafted in plain language;
(9) Establishing an Australian Small Business Development Corporation responsible for providing policy leadership and advice on small business matters to the Federal Government, including in relation unethical conduct faced by small businesses in business to business relationships;
(10) Establishing an Office of the Small Business Ombudsman within the Australian Small Business Development Corporation with specific responsibility to research and identify existing and emerging areas of disputation in business to business relationships involving small businesses with a view to identifying strategies, mechanism or legal options for minimising such disputes;
(11) Establishing an Expert Determination Scheme within the Australian Small Business Development Corporation with specific responsibility for finally resolving disputes in business to business relationships involving small businesses that remain unresolved following mediation; and
(12) Establishing a dedicated Small Business Enforcement Unit within the ACCC with sufficient funding to undertake enforcement action for all breaches of the Trade Practices Act relating to business to business relationships involving small businesses; and with a specific mandate to pursue test cases to clarify the operation and to identify possible gaps in the application of the unconscionable conduct provisions of the Trade Practices Act, as well in the proposed new statutory duty of good faith and proposed new laws against unfair contract terms in business to business relationships involving small businesses.
Professor Zumbo's proposed definition:
“For the purposes of this section “unconscionable conduct” includes anyaction in relation to a contract or to the terms of a contract that is unfair,unreasonable, harsh or oppressive, or is contrary to the concepts of fairdealing, fair-trading, fair play, good faith and good conscience.”
Prof. Zumbo: "The proposed definition represents a non-exhaustive definition of unconscionable conduct. Importantly, the use of word “includes” makes it clear that the proposed definition is intended to allow the existing judicial interpretation to be built upon through a statutory mandate that makes it clear that the concept of unconscionable conduct for the purposes of s 51AC of theTrade Practices Act is meant to cover all forms of unethical conduct.”
--
Related reading:
While on the subject of unconscionable conduct, you might also
think of dealing with certain national socialist tendencies of an ever right leaning government that is blocking access to web sites and engaging in other right wing, religious conservative/fundamentalist policies.
Here in America, we have finally succeeded in sending the religious nuts back under their rock with the great rejection of their craziness in the election of Barack Obama.
I am a devout libertarian, and I hope that Fiona Patten's movement achieves substantial gravity and liberates Australia from its "book burning" web site blocking direction. Blocking web sites is the hall mark of tyranny everywhere in the world today.
--
Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com, has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
Thanks Richard
there we were have an off topic shot and now we are into an off topic post elction campaign on who should be President. Suck it in guys and gals - move onward and upward. I have to say that mostly those Australians that were interested did like the idea of change in the US because we had only recently decided to change from one political party's abuse of our stupidity to a new direction and an exciting new abuse of our stupidity. The monstrous party machines cater to political parties and what they can suck from big business - and not the betterment of the people - although it is important to appear that they give a damn. Governments don't bring about change - people do - stupid people wait. I liked both your candidates. Happy?
Re: While on the subject of unconscionable conduct, you might al
Here in America, we have finally succeeded in sending the religious nuts back under their rock with the great rejection of their craziness in the election of Barack Obama.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Some of us think that we finally succeeded in proving the wisdom of our Founding Fathers by demonstrating that the general populace was too prone to allowing emotions to sway their judgment; hence the reason they did not provide for the direct popular election of the President. We have now elected the most unqualified, do nothing, worthless pieces of human debris to the highest office in this nation. I for one am embarrassed to have this effeminate, affirmative action candidate represent me. You may rejoice, I cry for my nation. But as they say, that is what makes horse racing.
FuwaFuwaUsagi
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers."
Affirmative Action
Obama's success is quite a validation of affirmative action.
Obama as President
Fuwa writes: "We have now elected the most unqualified, do nothing, worthless pieces of human debris to the highest office in this nation."
Interesting view. But exactly what does qualify anyone to run for President?
Michael Webster, a franchisee attorney in Toronto, Ontario, who publishes a website on business opportunities and franchises, called "The BizOp News"
Michael queries: But exactly
Michael queries:
But exactly what does qualify anyone to run for President?
My reply:
Technically it is spelled out in the Constitution. And on that basis some have questioned his credentials.
However there are matters of practicality. From a practical perspective I would start with:
I would say profound understanding of the founding principles of this nation (Obama failed that test when debating Keyes).
Or
Life experience that demonstrates sound judgment, leadership, and a substantive vision (Obama failed this test)
Or
Proven leadership of complex organizations with tangible achievements (Obama failed this test)
Or
An understanding via life experience of the common man and adherence to the principles this nation’s success was predicated upon (Obama failed this test)
However there are other issues. I grew up in a rough city, several friends ended up in prison and a couple were punked in prison. There was no surprise in whom was punked. I recognize a punk, and Obama is a punk. Sorry but when you are the supposed leader of the remnants of the most powerful nation on earth you are running with the big dogs, and this guy is a cur.
FuwaFuwaUsagi
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers."
Persuasion and leadership
"I would say profound understanding of the founding principles of this nation (Obama failed that test when debating Keyes)." - Fuwa
There's a couple of debates by Obama that I think people studying leadership should take note of. One is this great debate with Republican candidate Alan Keyes pitted against a quieter Barack Obama.
Watch a few minutes of the video and you will begin to see why 70% of Illinois' voters ended up voting for Barack Obama as their U.S. senator. Keyes discusses fighting terrorism in Iraq, weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, Keyes' long government experience vs Obama's lack of experience, eliminating free trade, using ethanol as an alternate fuel, how Keyes and his policies are more Christ-like than Obama's, etc. The debate is a study for business leaders on persuasion and leadership.
Take note that 40% of GOP members in Illinois decided not to vote for their own candidate, Keyes.
You may want to include some other facts...
that you casually omitted:
- Keyes was only running after the Republican primary winner, Jack Ryan, was outed by his ex-wife as being a pervert four months before the general election.
- Keyes jumped into the race in August 2004, just three months before the election.
- Keyes didn't even live in Illinois when he was asked to run in place of Ryan - he was a resident of Maryland. He had to move to Illinois after deciding to run.
Think these didn't affect the Illinois' voters to elect Obama to the seat in a landslide? Think again. Next time, it would be nice if you brought all the facts to the table for all to see. But, of course, you know that bias by ommission is a powerful tool.
Have a nice day.
Re: Michael queries: But exactly
In reflection I am not doing my country that I dearly loved any favors by pointing out the obvious about some people's President. So let's just break off the thread.
Richard's baiting just pushed my buttons. I should have just stayed my hand.
Take care.
FuwaFuwaUsagi
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers."
Aussies Wanted Obama
"You may rejoice, I cry for my nation."
And rejoicing they are. Back in September, some 62% of Australians thought that Obama would be better for relations with them and for NATO.
There is one thing that I know about history. Those that we remember as the great presidents are the ones that happened to step in during our most challenging times.
All very right, all
very off topic - but I should be the last to suggest such a thing. I will say that any result in any free election is better than no election at all ... think Mugabe ...
I personally was amazed at the result after most of us here originally thought that the US would not elect a woman or an African American. I think your country took a step up the ladder and I am hopeful we can do the same one day. Sorry Fuwa, I know I have no right to an opinion when I disagree with you.
My best mate (from Napa Valley) agrees with you, and as I told him; McCain came second - got the silver - can be proud he was the first place getter amongst all the other losers. It took a week but he is now talking to me again.
See ... I went off topic .....
Failure to embrace zees
Cee B, it was McCain's failure to embrace the franchise roots of his own wife and his running mate which led to his downfall.
Plus, he could have won Virginia if he had taken my advice and followed the historical tradition .
Personally, I liked McCain. I got the impression he would have come in to my store and ordered the top-dollar stuff and add the "value meal" but Obama was a "community activist" and they always order the daily special and ask for a cup of tap water.
Of course, now the Lehman Bros workers are asking for the tap water, but that's another story...
Paul Steinberg
Franchisee Attorney, New York City, Ph: 212-529-5400
Find a problem
then find a quick solution. Don't consider too much - just do it. Governments often take the easy way out with knee jerk "hope this is popular" decisions and we see this in the automotive bail outs where we spend more to prop up inefficent, shonky senior execs then we do to fix our hospital system.
Why is that GM & Ford bosses take home 5 times that of the Toyota boss? Who said you had to have "smarts" to change the direction and economy of a country. Take George W for example ... no, let's not go there ...
But you are quite right Richard and what about the tyranny of taking our guns off us. Half the country is being denied their right to shoot the other half. I just wish they would put a cap on sex ... bring everyone into line with my sorry existence.
Back to subject; the Inquiry into defining unconscionable conduct is way over due and if this government can offer up a basis for fair dealing to protect small business and consumers then that is a good thing. We have just been hit by 3 big storms causing severe damage and all you hear on radio is complaints of insurance claims being rejected.
Put this to the pub test; bloody big storm with bloody big winds and lots of bloody rain - old lady has claim rejected because she only had insurance against storms. A wave of water went through her home but she didn't have flood coverage .... go figure ..
This is unconscionable
The Anglican Church is reaching out to paedophiles who want to rejoin the Christian community – they recommend go to a Catholic Church.