Thanks Original Soupman for the Warning
Small Business Administration (59 replies) Mon, 2007/07/02 - 12:59
- SBA Misleading Troops to Bad Investments-Patriot Express Pilot (2007-07-02 13:57)
- SBA Guarantees Loans and Franchisors and Banks Always Win (2007-07-04 13:08)
- Calculated Sacrifice of Franchisees to Free Trade Principles? (2007-07-04 13:18)
- Yes contact your elected officials and demand restraint of trade (2007-07-04 13:13)
- Took a Risk and Lost ---Quiznos (2007-09-04 11:02)
- Thanks Original Soupman for the Warning (2007-09-03 12:28)
- Contract Law Protects the Sale of Duds to the Public (2007-11-06 13:35)
- Forbes: l0 Reasons ----Unfair Termination (2007-10-20 12:42)
- SbA in business of Guaranteeing Loans with High Failure Rates (2007-11-01 13:58)
- High Finance and Franchnising (2007-11-08 18:39)
- Sona MedSpa, The UPS Store, CSC, The CB are all on SBA (2007-11-17 11:54)
- YAAWWNN (2007-12-17 12:33)
- Franchise Loan Activity (2007-12-28 15:45)
- FuwaFuwaUsagi--Where do ZORS get their financing? SBA? (2008-02-16 16:14)
- SBA Patriot Express Pilot Loan Program ---VETS BEWARE (2007-07-02 22:11)
- SBA ---Bag Money for the Banks (2007-07-02 13:59)
- Risk of investment (2007-07-04 13:19)
- Z-Rube and you think we appreciate your dishonesty? (2007-07-04 13:09)
- I agree with you for the most part... (2007-07-04 13:10)
- 3% for SBA pool ---WOW ---PATRIOT EXPRESS LOANS (2007-07-04 13:11)
- Huh? (2007-11-06 13:46)
- Tell me Item 20 Ranter... (2007-10-20 12:46)
- Targeting underperformers (2007-10-22 10:43)
- SBA --FRAN DATA SNAPSHOTS MAY BE COVER FOR (2007-11-01 14:17)
- Item 20 Ranter never ceases to amaze (2007-11-17 11:59)
- Not quite a yawn, though I (2007-12-17 12:46)
- Maybe one day the Item 20 Ranter will have something to offer (2007-12-28 16:25)
- Why won't SBA finance the ZOR Corporation? (2008-02-16 17:26)
- ITEM 20 AND FAILUIRE RATES (2007-07-04 13:16)
- Z-rube LISTEN UP (2007-07-04 13:12)
- Z-rube you just don't get it (2007-07-04 13:13)
- God Bless You! (2007-07-04 13:20)
- Regulatory policy (2007-11-06 14:29)
- Government should regulate to protect ----FTC-SBA-IFA REMISS (2007-10-20 16:56)
- "Moved" to Where? (2007-10-20 16:12)
- Does TIF use FranData Research and Snapshots (2007-11-01 14:53)
- Regulatory implementation of statute (2007-11-12 10:49)
- Paul is it your job to rehabilitate the Item 20 Ranter rants? (2007-12-17 18:31)
- what do you offer again? (2007-12-28 16:29)
- Reading Item 20 of the UFOC (2007-07-04 13:43)
- No, Z-Rube your post says what you are saying! (2007-07-04 13:21)
- Item 20 Ranter it is you who cannot answer simple questions (2007-10-20 17:23)
- Is BMM now part of the Trilateral Commission? (2007-10-20 18:06)
- State UFOC must be in compliance with Federal Rule (2007-11-06 14:36)
- One more time I do not broker franchises or have clients (2007-11-01 15:23)
- As a fan of bad puns (2007-12-17 19:57)
- I suppose many things escape you... (2007-12-28 20:08)
- Are new franchisees who buy units from first-generation (2007-07-04 14:24)
- Even a stopped clock is right twice a day... (2007-12-17 20:04)
- i am here... (2008-01-02 20:01)
- In my experience transferees receive a UFOC (2007-07-04 15:12)
- Franchise Transfers (2007-07-04 15:49)
- Why don't you register anonymously? (2008-01-02 20:27)
- Do second generation franchisees get a UFOC (2007-07-04 15:25)
- uh huh. (2008-01-03 13:33)
- If the new zee is expected to sign the current form of agreement (2007-07-04 15:30)
- Why did Requirment UFOC for Transferees present legal disadvanta (2007-07-04 15:35)
- Okay "SleepTight" (2008-01-03 14:24)
- TIF, you forgot to quote me when... (2008-01-03 15:35)








Thanks Original Soupman for the Warning
Thanks for getting out here on Blue Mau Mau and telling us this story.
Do you realize that the UFOC that is supposed to be a document that enables you to "assess the risk of the investment and compare it with other investments" is really just a red herring of hundreds of pages of information that obscures the actual and franchisor- KNOWN statistical risk of the investment?
While the franchise agreement you signed and the UFOC do warn that there is risk and no guarantee of success, and that anything that was said to you outside of the contract doesn't count, this is all an artifice to prevent ZEES from learning how many businesses actually succeed and at what cost do they finally succeed. The franchisors almost protect themselves in the franchise agreements for their faulty estimates for start-up and breakeven and those ZEES who dig the hole deeper to try to get to breakeven to prevent losing their entire investments eventually can't dig for funds any more. All this time, the franchisor is earning profits off of all of the struggle you are engaged in to prove his "unproven concept" in the marketplace.
Government supports franchising and weak and ineffective disclosure because franchisees are logs on the fire of development in the years they remazin standing and provide jobs and tax revenue and profits for the franchisors. The franchisees are silenced in failure.
Talk to your elected representatives at State and Federal level. The UFOC is nothing more than a license to steal for those who will steal the life savings of innocent Americans who believe in their government and The American Dream ---that is so often the American nightmare.
This is an American Scandal but the dirty little secrets of franchising are hidden from the Americasn Public and enabled by an ugly status quo and a FTC who is in bed with the IFA.
Get mad as hell and try to spread the word.
Check and see if "Soupman" is still on the SBA Franchise Registry for a "quickie" loan from government and think about what this means.