Matching influence, $ for $, is...

Matching influence, $ for $, is...

Submitted by Les Stewart on Mon, 2008/02/25 - 09:00.

...the height of insanity.

It is an argument specifically meant to fail. Leave the law to the weasels who are paid to argue both sides of every coin.

Could God out-spend and out-muscle the following aroused economic interests during an election year cycle?:

  • product franchisors (auto, grocery & oil),
  • franchise bar (95% "brought to you by...),
  • sales agents,
  • advertising corporations, and
  • vote hounds and regulators.

Don't fight this war with the last's technology: Victory does not always accrue to the biggest dinosaurs. It can sometimes be taken by a few with the best shot (ie. most precise digital aim).

Franchising has changed you.

Will you repay your teachers or continue to cover your eyes and weep of the dark?

They're waiting...

Les Stewart MBA
Understanding Franchising

Franchisors Raise Money to Fight Franchisees in Australian High Court By: Deanne de Leeuw (6 replies) Mon, 2008/02/25 - 05:58