So the initial answer that the answer would have to come from the investor relations department was just a stall.

That was like 4 days ago, now Mr. Black gives an answer alleged to be based on his personal knowledge and his being at the meeting and observing what happened last year and this year.

If any of that was true, why could he not answer the question last week?

Is he willing to say that every other shareholder in attendance at the meeting, including himself and Scott Davis had proof of ownership of their shares and presented it at registration. Sorry, Mr. Black, you have failed the red face test, I do not believe you!

And the statement about two out of a billion plus is just plain dumb. Would he deny that 99.9% of the shareholders simply did not spend the money to travel to Wilmington. Sometimes a little common sense might help! Can he prove that the two they barred actually received the letter of notice and access. And did he really tell them all about this at the last meeting as he implies here.

It is obvious that UPS did not want them there and was using a very weak excuse to exclude them. I know the two people involved and I cannot believe that they would not have brought the proof if they had a clue that it would be required.

Janet, please contact Joe and Jim for a rebuttal!