Cuppy's Coffee and Java Jo'z

The remarks from an article that was published here on Java Jo'z and Cuppy Coffee is continued in this forum.

Average: 2.5 (6 votes)

Tags:

There are no tags.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Today Is Day 10

Dale where are you?

Don't go with Cuppy's!

People looking into Franchising BEWARE! DO NOT GO WITH CUPPY'S. IF YOU ARE BUYING ADVICE, THEY DON'T HAVE ANY. THEY DON'T EVEN HAVE A STRUCTURE IN PLACE. IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE ME, CALL AND INQUIRE AND ASK AS MANY QUESTIONS AS YOU CAN ABOUT BUSINESS. THINK OF A WHOLE BUNCH AND THEY WILL BE UNABLE TO ANSWER THEM! THEY DO NOT KNOW ANSWERS TO EASY QUESTIONS AND THEY HAVE NO WORTH WHILE SYSTEM OPERATIONS. I HAVE RESEARCHED THEIR WEBSITE AND THEY HAVE GATHERED INFORMATION FROM THE INTERNET TO PUT ON THEIR OWN WEBSITE. USE YOUR OWN INFORMATION. GET A REAL SYSTEM. YOU WOULD BE BETTER OFF STARTING A COFFEE BUSINESS YOURSELF.

More Cuppy's Deceit!

...just had their Cuppy's Texas site pull down this page entirely this afternoon:

This image is what they didn't want anyone seeing...too late

These crooks can run from the truth all they want, but they can't hide! We all know Cuppy's was formerly Java Jo'z and taking that page down doesn't make it any less true.

 

Cuppy's Coffee From the Inside!!

Has anyone done any real research beyond “looking” at just the website before you start blasting and possibly ruining the lives and businesses of those that have not had this problem? 

I am not going to sit here and try to defend either side of the lost money issue. If you lost and were screwed out of $30k, I feel for you….I really do.  I would be upset and doing everything possible to get my money back if there was a legal road to walk down.  But, on the same token, as others have said, if you gave money without having your documents reviewed…shame on you.

So, here is a little skinny from a former Java Jo’z (license) owner now Cuppy’s store owner (franchisee). And by the way, a few months ago, I purchased my 2nd Cuppy’s franchise.  I am tired of seeing all of this bad information floating around with the possibility that most of you actually have never walked into the corporate office of Cuppy’s Coffee. 

First off…..Java Jo’z was NEVER intended to be a franchise…they never sold franchise’s. One would think that with all of the “legal eagles” we have out here ranting….this would have been one of the first things discovered.  I bought a license from Java Jo’z just like everyone else did.  There is a huge difference between how a franchise works and how a licensee company works.  Let’s get that straight right from the start.

Next, if anyone would have taken the time and had done some real research this is what they would have found: This past year Robert Morgan bought all of the assets of Java Jo’z Coffee & More Inc. from Roy & Kim Snowden (owners of Java Jo’z). He did not buy “the company” (as a matter of fact, the company Java Jo’z Coffee & More Inc. still exists).  New companies were formed off of that concept…. Cuppy’s Coffee & Elite Manufacturing as well as other companies.  

As for Cuppy’s being in the same offices, that’s what happens when a new company assumes the lease. I believe by purchasing the assets he had the option to use the same computers, utilize the same personnel, the same phone system, etc.  Call me silly, but if you have an awesome concept and a great vision….why re-invent the wheel? Now, as I understand it, part of this agreement was that the Java Jo’z store owners that were out across the nation would still have someone behind them with some corporate purchasing power. (Being a new company…did they need to do that…I don’t think so?)  That is why you see mirror images of the specialtycoffeecoop.com website and other parts of the website.

Now getting onto the subject of the awesome personal website that Mike Wallace setup for himself in Texas, sure he probably is not “really” supposed to have that site up now that we are franchised….but he is lucky enough to have it. Oh yeah, it sure is nice of everyone out there to point that out for him.  I bet he really appreciates that.  If he opened as a Java Jo’z store and then converted to a Cuppy’s store…. at his level as a store owner what is so wrong with saying that he was “formerly Java Jo’z”?  I don’t get it? I am “formerly” Java Jo’z.

Like I said in the beginning…if you are legally owed money….by all means, get it.  But, get it from those who owe it to you!  I don’t understand why you can so easily bash a franchise company you have not dealt with? Maybe you should actually go down to Fort Walton Beach, walk into the Cuppy’s corporate office where there are now over 100 dedicated and hardworking people with families. Look them in the eyes and explain why you feel it’s necessary to pull them into something that they have had nothing to do with.  Explain to them how they are responsible for something that happened to you while you were contracting with a different company. 

At one time in this process YOU saw the opportunity this concept has, or you would not have given a down payment right?  Well, we…..are still out here……OUR stores ARE open!!  Maybe you should think about that before you start typing next time. Why are you so willing to crush the dreams of those of us that are out here who believe in the company we “FRANCHISED” with CUPPY’S COFFEE!

Oh by the way…now that I have done some “due diligence” research on my end concerning the company you are attacking…..my franchisor.  To those of you asking for your money back…..  Did you do everything you were supposed to do in the contract you signed?  Or are you just giving up and jumping on the “give me my money back” bandwagon?

Cuppy's Coffee & Java Jo'z Controversy

Mr. Blue MauMau:  When I started this thread it was as a news story, but seems to have grown to a forum topic.  Sorry.  I'm not quite sure where to post which items, but I'll use my blog page in the future.

 Insider Guest:  I appreciate the plight of a franchisee having to operate under the bad press of their franchisor's troubled past.  If only for marketing and brand building purposes, it would be wise for you and the other Cuppy's franchisees to urge your franchisor to help mitigate the damage caused to those who allegedly gave their money in good faith to the same executives - sans Snowden - who are running Cuppy's.  If these allegations are correct, people like Ben Scoble and others paid for the assets now owned by Cuppy's.  Perhaps you could convince the franchisor to allocate some of the money they are spending in franchise advertising to repaying some of those who lost their downpayments.  A good faith effort could possibly even turn some of these potential litigants into Cuppy's franchisees.

I'm no "legal eagle," but I believe that your characterization of franchising vs. licensing is incorrect.  Franchising is a type of licensing - they are not exclusive.  And if Java Jo'z was charging a fee, operating under a common name and exerting a measure of operational control, there's a good chance it was a franchise no matter what they called it.  Also, Mike Wallace's website refers to the entire Cuppy's system as "formerly Java Jo'z" not his particular location.

Sean Kelly
seankelly@ideafarm.net

IdeaFarm
Franchisor Marketing ,  FranBest

Cuppy of Java Joe ...Anyone?

I’ve stayed out of the Cuppy’s/Java Joe debacle up until now….WHY because to be honest I know nothing about either one.  Up until today what I knew about the two was pretty much limited to that which I’d read here at Bluemaumau.  For the most part that was limited to one or more ‘Guest’ slinging a lot of mud -- right or wrong I don’t know.  Up until last night it sounded pretty much like one or more franchisees/licensees complaining.  THE PAST.

Last night another ‘Guest’ who claimed to be a Cuppy’s franchisee posted a heartfelt message which accurately communicated a viewpoint.  That view point was simply ‘Hey—if you lost money I’m sorry, but I’ve got my money on the line right now…I’m trying to make money …. and your complaining is costing me money.  They went on to say that the guest who were doing the complaining were to some degree uninformed, or that their information was outdated.  THE PRESENT.

Today, it appears as though a Cuppy’s corporate person provided a response.  Good for them, even though it turned into more of an advertisement for selling/converting franchisees vs. a here’s the scoop, we’ve inherited a problem and here’s how we propose to fix the problem, signed by Mr. Joe President of Cuppy’s with personal contact information for resolving any and all problems.  THE FUTURE.

So based on the tiny bit of verifiable factual information provided, I took a look at the Nevada Secretary of States website and searched out Medina Enterprises were we learn that the corporate entity was formed 12/16/2003 and is Active and in good standing.  Their officers all have the last name of Morgan (Alyssa R, Christina F, and Robert C) and use the address of 2533 N. Carson St, Carson City, NV  89706.  This address is also the address of their Resident Agent Laughlin International, Inc.  When you view all the companies which Laughlin serves as resident agent there are MANY!!!!.  When you view the records for Laughlin International, Inc. you find that a Lee Morgan held all the officer positions AND they were dissolved on 4/24/2002.  However they may somehow be tied to Laughlin & Associates, Inc. at the same 2533 N. Carson address whose file date is 3/25/77 and are currently an active NV corporation with Michelle Young holding all officers positions.  If you jump over to the Florida Secretary of State site and take a look at Medina Enterprises you find that they’re active as a Foreign Profit corporation (Date Filed 5/8/06) with a principle address of 348 Miracle Strip Parkway SW, BLDG D Suite 16A, FT. Walton Beach FL  32548.  Robert C. Morgan listed as both Registered Agent and Officer/Director.  Now if you go to www.Medinamgt.com you find listings for Cuppy’s, Specialty Coffee Coop, Elite Manufacturing, and Planet Popolicious.  What does all of this mean?  Well, hmmmm I don’t know.  It could mean exactly what the ‘current franchisee’ and the ‘corporate office’ said it meant that they purchased the assets of a company and apparently did not do their due-diligence to uncover the mess that they’d soon have on their hands.  It could be that they did know of the mess, thusly why they acquired the ‘Assets’ and not the business and liabilities.  It could be as some suggest a big CONSPIRACY.  As for the fact that some former employees of the acquired company were retained, is not unusual and in fact prudent, and does not in and of itself make it a conspiracy.

Now for what “I do know” but first for what those of your reading this now know.  You now know who the ‘Horse’ is and how to go straight to the ‘Horses’ mouth.  Most likely what you’re going to find is that there is now a company who acquired assets, but not liabilities thusly meaning your ‘Beef’ is with Snowden and can only be resolved by Snowden, but that entity probably went bankrupt after selling off the assets.  You’ll probably find that the new entity acquired the assets has NO legal liability to you.  You’ll probably find that many of the former employees are with the new company. 

As for what I know, the one item that JUMPED out at me was Planet Popolicious, which was founded by Lee Washington and his wife of Waco, TX.  Lee and his wife are good, honest, Christian people.  I do not know if they’ve retained interest in Planet Popolicious or if Medina Enterprises also acquired them and or their assets.  I also know Jerry Aurthur, who was VP of Sales for Planet Popolicious.  Again I don’t know if Jerry is still associated with Planet Popolicious or not, but he is very talented in building, growing and supporting franchise systems.

And finally, for one last thing I do know.  Ruining the lives of existing Cuppy’s franchisees isn’t going to help you regain your lost funds.  I know you’re upset and you’re trying to prevent anyone else from being ripped off, however you’ve first got to determine IF the risk of fraud, theft, misrepresentation is the same as it was at the time you handed over your funds.  If there is a NEW CONCEPT with Ownership committed to building and growing the system, sabotaging that system is not going to benefit anyone or help you recover monies which you may be owed.

There has been much discussion about the Pro’s and Con’s of Anonymity.  However, it’s difficult for anyone to tell how many people are saying what, when everyone has the name GUEST.  If you’re serious about making a difference, and there are many of you register under a pseudonym so that we can see and know who we are speaking with and who is speaking, Even if it’s as simple as RippedOffZee1, RippedOffZee2, HappyZee1, HappyZee2.

If you’ve been ripped off there are many people here who might be willing to help you, if you have the right attitude.  If you want/need help there are many people here who might be willing to help you.  But if you just want to complain for the sake of complaining….make it known that that’s really all you want to do….after all that is a form of therapy, however if your serious about overcoming whatever situation you’re faced with you’ve got to open your eyes, your ears and your MIND!

Believe & Succeed,
FranSynergy
Synergizing Franchising 1 Franchisee at a time!
www.fransynergy.com

Cuppy's Question

I've been reading this discussion and as someone that worked for a franchisor, I think I know the basic rules of the UFOC and the legalities behind it.

 According to Cuppy's own web-site, they had a franchise ready to open in June 2006 in Houma (not sure which state), per their own press release dated May 23, 2006.  How can a company that was organized on May 31, 2006 be able to sell franchises before they have organized?  I'm guessing that a relevant UFOC wasn't prepared by May 23rd.  In addition, I know that there are time frames that a UFOC has to be held by a franchisee before they can sign the document. 

 I'm going based on the UFOC that was posted on the California web-site, but isn't it also required that you state every employee that may have contact with the franchisee in the approval process included?  Mr. Doyle was not included in the UFOC, yet there is a May 15th press release with his name on it. 

 I'm no lawyer, but my knowledge of the UFOC was to disclose everything possible to cover your company in the case of a lawsuit.  In this case (unless they've updated their UFOC and disclosed all unopened franchisees), I would think that they've left a good deal out of the UFOC that should've been included.

I could be wrong, but that's how I understood things with my prior company.  If I'm wrong, please correct my inaccuracies.

Cuppy's now carries Java Jo'z burden

Great writeup from the brother of somebody else ripped off by Java Jo'z. There's no mention of Ben Doyle in this article, which shows he isn't the only unscrupulous piece of dirt infesting 348 Miracle Strip Parkway in Fort Walton Beach.

http://itmanager.blogs.com/notes/2007/01/why_java_joz_pr.html

Letter from Cuppy's lawyer

Apparently Cuppy's is not happy with the MauMau community, and their law firm (Nixon Peabody) emailed me a letter a few minutes ago.

If anyone knows how to post a pdf attachment, I would be happy to post a copy of the letter. If anyone wants me to email them a copy, drop me a line.

And I would invite Mr. Zappia to post the letter himself. Let the sun shine in!

Parenthetically, for those who have wondered why people post anonymously, this is why. I am not intimidated by lawyers, but some people might be.

--Paul Steinberg, pwsteinberg@msn.com

Im an insider from the company, i'll tell you the truth...

Okay folks.  I'm an inside employee.  I was hired as an employee for Java Joz.  I am now with Cuppy's.  I read all these posts and see this unfair portrayal happening.   Do not believe all the trash talk.  It's easy to hide behind a 'guest' comment and put your attack dogs on this company, knowing they cant fight back.   Some of you are playing dirty, and you know it.  Shame on you.  This company is trying to take the high road by not snipping back at every untrue accusation.  Why give these untruths power by addressing them.  Through my employment with both companies, I have only seen things done professionally and with integrity.  This is what I know as truth…. I see people working long days, and long nights to service the franchisees.   I see an on site day care that is offered for free to all the employees. I see 100 + employees who have heart and truly want to help people.  I see a hard working real estate department busting their butts looking for good locations. I see the finance department on the phones trying to help these people get funded. I see the marketing department developing clever and inexpensive ways to help these franchisees make a better life for themselves.  I see the truth..We are helping people.   Every person in that company works so hard to help these people.  It's unfair to let all these absurd postings appear as if no one tried to help the Java Joz owners.   Do you people realize all your references and snide connections are affecting these people’s lives.    It’s affecting my life.  You are trying to bring down a good company.If you really have a problem, call them up and say as much.  Go see them.  Go see them now. Don’t say ‘I already went’.   It’s a different company. It’s not Java Joz.    I work with smart, enthusiastic, people.   Not uneducated youth and old crooks.  I am lucky to be employed there,  and I freakin love my job!   Don’t be deceived by all this ridiculous crap flying around the Internet.    You want the truth, go see the company for yourself.

Cuppy's Please read!

As you see above, this post is from Jan. 2007. I wonder if the above franchisee now sees the full picture. Please read the 3rd paragraph, you will notice it says visit- Fort Walton Beach and over 100 employees. Well now there remains a handfull that aren't even getting paid. How much is your Franchisor worth now? Do you think they truly care when they can't even pay their own bills. They are worried and stressed about their own situations. We would all like to know how you are doing. Is your 1st store still open and PLEASE let us know if you ever opened your second, or did you just give up more hard earned money for nothing?

Re: Cuppy's Coffee & Java Jo'z Controversy

Sean,

You make some very valid points. It would be very wise of Cuppy's to try and do what's right, in the name of Java Joz, by exercising some damage control by giving back money to those who are contractually owed.  Sadly however, this whole "Cuppy's" maneuver was planned (albeit poorly) from the start in an attempt to seperate Snowden's name from the company, not to mention the assests.  They may be a different company on paper, but the swindlers (minus Roy Snowden, who is now facing prison time), are still intact, at the same office.  The company name might be different, but the people are the same. That is where the problem lies, and when you factor their greed into the equation, I'd be shocked if they were to exercise common sense in doing what you proposed, as any other "ethical" business would. 

 

The Front Page

The posting below "Cuppy's Coffee From the Inside" looks like it was submitted accidentally as a news "story". It is a response to a discussion thread so I have placed it more appropriately in our forum section. Our community of franchisees greatly appreciates this Cuppy's Coffee franchisee taking the time to write this article to clarify from the inside of the network how they see it.

A news story is automatically posted by our franchisee community of citizen journalists to the front page because of the timely nature of news. The editor can move certain stories that are not considered appropriate for the front page to a back page. He also scours the category back pages to find and publish timely advice columns on Blue MauMau's front page from individual blog entries. In doing so the editor reserves the right to edit the entry to match our front page story template (see What Is A Blog Entry?), which typically consists of a photo, a sub-header, and an introductory paragraph that overviews the full story.

Regards,
Mr. Blue MauMau
Editor

p.s. "Guests" of the community cannot edit their postings. Registered members (free of charge) can.

From The Inside..Response..

Firstly, yes..we did do "everything" we were supposed to do in the contract we signed.  My contract clearly states the money would be returned if we couldn't find a site.  Snowden got into tax trouble with the IRS and Java Jo'z knew it would be the beginning of bad publicity and this was a calculated maneuver on their part.  These same principals now running Cuppy's are the same people we all did business with when we signed our Java Jo'z contracts and conveniently tell us "we aren't Java Jo'z anymore, we don't have a contract with you".  They are the same ones who, even before their transition, wouldn't take our calls or follow their contractual obligations.  Of course we had lawyers review our contract - these guys just opted to ignore what they signed and leave us out there without returning  our money or even our phone calls.  They knew what they were doing when they changed the name and the format..it's NOT just one or two of us you know!  Also, I don't believe for a minute that you are a store owner you use the same verbage as their employees.  We will continue to post, we will continue to tell everyone we can how this rip-off came about.  When you're wrong, you're wrong. 

Anonymity

Speaking of using pseudonymns and anonymity, I found these free anonymous email accounts for the truly paranoid Deep Throats out there. That way you can get your passwords when you register on the site but leave only a trail of vapor for those secret agencies out there.

Re: Cuppy of Java Joe ...Anyone?

Nobody is questioning the legitimacy of the company that purchased Java Jo'z, but when you keep the same unscrupulous staff unboard, namely Roy Snowden's right-hand-man and business partner, Ben Doyle, whose picture Cuppy's just now pulled off their site, by the way (see picture here), then this company is at risk of tarnishing their good reputation.  If they don't want the residual baggage from the crooks that have been so deceitful and unscrupulous in their business practices, they need to exercise a bit of common sense and clean house, so that they don't need to be dragged into the "Mudd", so to speak. Ben Doyle is a crook like Snowden.  Perhaps this company will come to realize this and get rid of this clown because he'll do nothing but bring them down...and he's not the only one...if they clean house, they'd be doing themselves a huge favor.

Liability of company "acquiring" assets of another

It may be difficult, but not impossible, to hold the current f'zor liable for the liabilities of the previous entity.

Assuming that the old (Java) entity had liabilities and transferred assets to a new entity (Cuppy's), thereby leaving the transferor (Java) insolvent, there are state laws which may be applicable. Look at your state law and run search terms such as "Debtor/Creditor", "Fraudulent Conveyance", "successor in interest", "alter ego" and follow the statute and case law.

Depending on your state law, you may or may not have to prove intent. In my state (New York) the Debtor-Creditor laws provide for causes of action in which proving intent is not necessary.

And if there was an interest in real property (such as leases) which was transferred, a fraudulent conveyance claim may enable you to file a lis pendens on the interest in real property--again, this is state specific.

This is a fact-specific inquiry which necessitates knowledge of your state law and a review of your franchise agreement. Do not assume that just because the franchise agreement waives your rights under state law and/or specifies a choice of law that any such waiver or choice of law provision is valid--certain provisions of state law may be non-waivable.

Additionally, you should look at all possible venues in which the Transferor and Transferee are subject to personal jurisdiction, since the court will likely (though not necessarily) apply local law.

And if you seriously have evidence of fraud or other behavior violative of law, put together a basic outline with supporting exhibits and send it to the franchise regulator in each state; a listing of names and addresses can be found in the CCH Business Franchise Guide. But don't get into finger pointing or whining: the regulators are seeking a legal basis for any action against a company doing business in their state, and the fact that you may have lost all of your savings in a harebrained franchise is not necessarily a violation of law, however unethical the f'zor behavior may have been.

Also, send a copy of your evidence to Bob Purvin at the AAFD, Susan Kezios at the AFA, and Steven Toporoff at the FTC. (The FTC will ignore you, which is why no one bothers complaining to them. But then the FTC tells Congress that all is peachy in the franchise industry since no one is complaining.)

And go visit your local print and broadcast media, and give them the information together with the contact information for your state regulator--that way the reporter will hold the regulator's feet to the fire. Some national reporters such as Janet Sparks and Julie Bennett may be interested in the story as well. BUT-- make sure to put together a good package with a summary, bullet points, exhibits, and a contact list with name/address/phone/email as well as have an idea of who can give good media interviews.

I don't know if there is a violation of law here or not. But if you have evidence, take it to the persons who can do something about this.

Good luck, and keep us posted on your progress.

--Paul Steinberg, pwsteinberg@msn.com

Suing a blogger

Alex Scoble links the best post to these lawyers who want to sue bloggers.  Maybe Cuppy's should give this a read:

 

http://www.computerworld.com/blogs/node/2411

Responsible Bloging!

Paul:

Why did they email you?  Were they particularly unhappy with a comment made by you or were you the only one whom they had a contact info for?

I'm sure that as you point out some people post anonymously for fear of a suit.  I think that there are also MANY other reasons why some do.

I would encourage you to start a thread on RESPONSIBLE BLOGING.  As we all know anyone can sue anyone, over anything.  However, there is much less to fear if what is being said is truthful, and validatable.  It's the untruths and the half-truths, the unsubstantiated,  that will end up causing peole to be sued and lose.  With that said, my legal counsel advised me to be careful about what I say about individuals and legal entities even IF IT IS THE TRUTH.  I didn't ask them about the liability of being OVERLY OPTIMISTIC.  LOL

Believe & Succeed,
FranSynergy
Synergizing Franchising 1 Franchisee at a time!
www.fransynergy

Watch Where You Aim

"Ben Doyle was a Very Nice man until the money was sent in...requesting a contractually obligated refund caused him to turn VERY UGLY and stop taking calls" - Guest

I don't get it. Why pick on Doyle? Am I missing something? Is he the new CEO?

From reading the posts, Doyle looks like a manager who is supposed to do what he's told.  Can't imagine a Real Estate Director being able to dispense $30k franchise refunds without approval. There isn't much reason to talk on the phone either until there's some news.

Frankman

Re: Im an insider from the company, i'll tell you the truth...

Yes, let stay on the subject of FACTUAL TRUTH: Tax Fraud Roy Snowden and his good friend and business partner Ben Doyle, owe me $25,000 dollars that I'll never see.  You may not be aware that many of us know how Snowden's tax issues came to light in 2004 to where the whole formation of "Cuppy's" went into motion to circumvent Snowden's crookery.  At least he'll be sentenced soon.  Will you be attending the sentencing?

...and while we're on the subject of TRUTH, I'm STILL waiting for an explanation as to why the upstanding Cuppy's franchise took Ben Doyle's picture off their website a few days ago. You got something to hide? Or perhaps you're starting to get a conscience over there maybe?

This is affecting your life?  How dare you whine about your lifestyle after what you KNOW your company did to so many of us.  Go ahead and spew out your feeble attempt at damage control all you want.  Ben Doyle, Roy Snowden, and company made the bed...if you don't like laying in it, that's your problem. How you people sleep at night is beyond me.

Thank you

It is refreshing to see this post! This post helped me to make a decision to come and visit the Cuppys Corp offices.  From what I have researched you have confirmed in your post.  Again Thank you for your honesty!

Coffee Fan

I give you credit for sticking up for your company.  Since you worked for both of these entities, what makes Cuppy's different from Java Joz?  You talk about how you've only seen things done 'professionally and with integrity', then consider the quote below from the Department of Justice's press release of Roy Snowden's problems with the IRS.

"Roy P. Snowden admitted that he failed to file accurate and timely income tax returns from 1992 through 1997, and was subsequently assessed taxes by the IRS. After the tax assessment, Roy P. Snowden admitted he transferred businesses and placed assets in others’ names, and created corporate entities which he used in part to transfer and hold money and property out of the reach of the IRS."

http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/fln/press%20releases/2006/nov/Snowden.htm

I hope Cuppy's (the franchise), the franchisees, and the employees future success, but if these issues are true about taking money from people as Java Joz, the current owners (who I believe were part of Java Joz) should've taken that into consideration when they purchased the company, and made the sellers escrow a certain dollar amount to pay off these liabilities.  Had they done that, these people wouldn't be screaming.  If they did not take any money from these people, then Mr. Snowden would've eventually got his money.  As someone else stated before, Buyer Beware.  The Buyer's of the Java Joz assets, should've been aware that they were buying something that might cause them headaches.

Oh, and yes, I hide as a 'guest', but so are you.  I have no financial dealings with Cuppy's or any of these people looking for refunds. 

Java Joz & Cuppys

i have seen both companies from the franchisee's view. they are one and the same with a different name. Same management (without snowdens) but the same. When I started my adventure into signing up as a franchisee it was with Java joz. it was after june 2006 when I was contacted to move to cuppys. nothign changed but the name of the company.
speaking of which, I am in contact with one of the franchisees who had to close her store in Texas becuase of slow sales. I was also told since she closed her store cuppys corp had no contact with them. none. is this a company you want to do business with. a company that takes 187K and provides some support but when things go south they drop you like a hot pototoe. thank goodness my sales are good otherwise I wonder where i would be, filing bankrupcty like the one in texas

Doing the Right Thing

Cuppy's will never do the right thing.  They have gone to an extraordinary amount of time and trouble to screw us and continue to move on.  No matter how much spin they put on this the facts of the matter are this:

1.  Snowden plead guilty and Java Jo'z had previously done everything in their power to never have anything posted that would put them in a bad light.  That is why when people started blogging and kicking up their heels they would then start to return phone calls.  The only way people were getting their money back was if they signed agreement that said they wouldn't post anything derogatory about the company anywhere..blog, newsgroups, etc. or they would sue you.  This "silencing" worked because people wanted their money back.  They made refund deals paying "over time", with some potential licensees even being told they would be paid monthly over 12 - 24 months.

2. Once Snowden went to court and it became public knowledge that he was, in fact, a crook and hid assets behind other companies and his wife, they created "Cuppy's" which would disassociate themselves with Java Jo'z.  That is why they are so determined to tell you "we aren't Java Jo'z, we are Cuppy's".. changing the name of both the licensing company and the manufacturing company.  All of the principals of Java Jo'z run Cuppy's.  They are identical entities of each other only now they decided on the bigger sting by going franchise instead of licensing agreements.

3.  They now feel they have no obligation to the peoplethey owe even though it's their current staff that talked people into these deals, clearly stating they could get a their money back.  That money is now being used for Snowden to pay back the IRS, legal fees, and speciality fines.

4. Snowden plead guilty which probably means he has a plea agreement for no prison time even though what he is facing is 30 years.  I'm sure if he used this money to quickly repay what he owed he did it to avoid prison.

5. You can bet if Snowden doesn't do jail time he'll be back in the mix of this company.  If not, he will find other ways to get money then threaten bankruptcy.

6.  The chances of anyone getting their money back at this point is probably nil.  Snowden is threatening bankruptcy and will probably follow through with it.  He's a crook remember, and they have no morals or social responsibilities.

7. The only thing we can do is let people know what they are getting into.  Those same guys may purport to be these upstanding "Cuppy's" people but they are the exact same individuals with not a care in the world about the many people who are owed money and gave it to them in good faith.  Okay Okay we get, you changed your name, but we are all still out our $30,000 and some of us even more than that. 

 8. We aren't going to be quiet.  We will continue to post, we will continue to blog, and we will continue to tell anyone who listens what happened to us.  You haven't seen anything yet.

Not to Mention..

That these are the SAME GUYS who ripped off the people who put their money down on Java Jo'z..have they somehow seen the light and won't rip of Cuppy's people?? I HIGHLY doubt that!

Another Cuppy of Java ---Joe?

You present a fair point of view.  Thank you.

I'm not saying this is or isn't the case, but USUALLY when acquiring a company you absolutely must hang on to certain key people in order to gain the knowledge they have, even if you DO NOT LIKE THEM....just long enough to gain the knowledge which they posess so that you don't 'cut your nose off to spite your face'.

But I'm sure that with a clear alrticulate argument like you make, the new ownership will be listening and evaluating the Ben Doyle asset/liability.  Why don't you and others explain what it is that Ben Doyle has done.  Factual he did this ...this and this...not just simply that he is a crook.  We all must also remember that there's always to sides to every argument my side, their side and the truth.  I've learned that truth almost always lies to some degree on both of the other two sides.....but it's that WHOLE TRUTH...NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH kind of truth that one must get to.  And sometimes what may be morally and ethically repulsive is not necessarily illegal.

But thanks for providing a Fair argument, with sound advice to the new ownership if what you say is true.  I hope they listen, conduct the proper evaluation and make a determination as to what is in the best interest of their current and future franchisees.

Believe & Succeed,
FranSynergy
Synergizing Franchising 1 Franchisee at a time!
www.fransynergy.com

Watch your Mouth (typing)

I wouldn't be too quick to discount the merit in shutting down internet conversation.  I had a little dust up with an Orlando-based franchisor a few years ago.

They got what they wanted.

It should be noted that fully 50% of the people involved in every lawsuit don't want to be there.

My experience with an internet-based legal challenge.

Les Stewart, MBA
FranchiseFool.com
Ontario, Canada

Re: Watch Where You Aim

That's just it, you 'ARE' missing something.  You said: "From reading the posts, Doyle looks like..." 

You're simply speculating on how you perceive him, as opposed to actually dealing with him personally.  Did you know he is/was Roy Snowden's good friend and BUSINESS PARTNER at Java Jo'z? (Snowden actually acknowledges that specifically from a post he made on a website here, just for those of you outsiders that may not be aware of this). Roy Snowden, who is being sentenced for tax fraud this month, never had the guts to speak to any of us about honoring the contracts when locations couldn't be secured. His partner in crime, Ben Doyle did that...as in FULL PARTNER.  Don't mistake this man for someone who simply holds a "sales position" in the company.  Why do you think Cuppy's removed Doyle's picture from their website last week?  They're scrambling to try to cover their tracks, but to no avail. From an outsider looking in, I can understand and respect how you may want to be objective....if you were one of the many of us that were deceived and lied to by these scoundrels, you'd obviously feel differently.  

Crook Ben Doyle will bring Cuppy's down too..

Don forget Roy Snowden's partner in crime, Mr. Ben Doyle seen at http://i128.photobucket.com/albums/p198/ben-doyle/doyle-full-screen.jpg

Ben Doyle still has the same position at the same desk in the same office.  Change the company name a thousdand times, it doesn't matter...Ben Doyle will continue to lie and mislead, just as his good friend Roy Snowden did.

I believe most of us have contracts conspicuosly stating the obvious if securing a location became an issue to where one couldn't be secured.  This happend to dozens of us.

Oh by the way, why did the upstanding Cuppy's franchise remove that picture of Ben Doyle just the other day? Why? (rhetorical question). Wow, and deceitful crooks they are at that.

 

 

The Whole Truth?

In regards to the "whole truth" referenced below, any outsider who doesn't actually know the facts first hand can only speculate.

Let me throw this out first.  It seems like the particular individual at RipoffReport here  may not have had a clause to protect him in his contract, but the essence of that post in regards to how Ben Doyle behaved (with his partner Roy Snowden) is consistent with what over a dozen others also experienced, as in the ones that DID have the contract specifically bring up a deposit refund if a location couldn't be secured.  Ben Doyle was a Very Nice man until the money was sent in...requesting a contractually obligated refund caused him to turn VERY UGLY and stop taking calls....THAT is the most disturbing part in how he carried himself.  This is fact for many who experienced this first-hand.  

But back to the WHOLE TRUTH issue. Let's use a documented FACTUAL example here: If Ben Doyle wasn't an unscrupulous, lying businessman, as those us who dealt with him first-hand already know, then why did Cuppy's REMOVE HIS PHOTO from the website a few days ago instead of standing by their esteemed VP of Real Estate?

Their actions in doing that are a blatant admission of what the deceived already know to be true.  This isn't about spending valuable time in a franchise blog so that people can call Ben Doyle names.  We know what the facts are.  For some reason (a reason obvious to those who were blatantly deceived first-hand), Cuppy's felt compelled to remove Ben Doyle's photo a few days ago...that's a fact. Feel free to speculate away.  Roy Snowden's sentencing is coming up, that's also a fact.  Ben Doyle may not have a court hearing coming up, but he'll likely get his day in court sooner or later.

I wish..

I wish someone had told me that when I got married, and changed my name, it wiped out all my debts and obligations.  "Who? Oh that's not my name anymore, I have not contractual obligation to you..."

Re: The Whole Truth?

FYI: You can expect to see a new picture of Ben Doyle alongside his Real Estate team posted very soon.

Take Responsibility

When you purchase a car, you don't pay a "deposit", you pay a down payment.  You have purchased something and your money is not refundable because you change your mind.  If you sign a "purchase agreement" and pay a "down payment" you have agreed to pay for what you have purchased.  Business is business people, don't always believe everything you hear.  Any successful business owner will tell you the same.  When people ask for their money back, they are in fact choosing to walk away!  Usually, this tends to occur right about the time that it gets a little hard.  We live in a world where people have lost the ability to get their hands dirty and work at something.  Life is not easy and niether is opening a business.  I have a challenge for those of you who "want your money back".  Take the energy you have put into trying to make Cuppy's look bad, and trying to get your money back and open a successful coffee shop with the care and support that is offered to you from the Cuppy's staff!!!! 

Take Responsibility...yeah right

I was told that my money would be refuned and it wasn't because i didn't get approved for the financing...is this my fault too?

    Syndicate content