Public Forums of Discussion

share franchise news, to prosper and amuse

Log In / Register | Feb 10, 2012

Is Curves actually chasing departed franchisees for ongoing royalty?

I read the recent string of posts that started with the story of two franchisees in Pennsylvania who Curves sued for ongoing royalty minimums after they quit Curves and converted their gyms to independent competitors.

I have a little different question.

Does anyone know if Curves is chasing people who just shut down and go back to 9 to 5 jobs?

The writers in the earlier string were right. Curves has ongoing minimum royalties and ad charges even if the franchisee has no sales. Are they chasing people who just want to go on with life and are not competing in violation of the noncompete agreements?

Thanks in advance for any input.

2 Forum Remarks

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
michael webster's picture

Curves Lawsuits

Hmm, wouldn't a pacer search on parties disclose this information?

Michael Webster PhD LLB
Misleading Advertising Law

curves lawsuits

Has anyone heard about the curves owners lawsuit? if so please e-mail me at rlay6551@msn.com

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.