Home | MyMauMau: Log In / Register | Ask Franny
Log In / Register | Feb 9, 2010

Midas Australia Company Stores Closing

SYDNEY, Australia (Blue MauMau) - It is estimated that more than half of the Midas Australia chain will begin closing this Friday; while in administration. Company staff have been advised of store closures this morning and that they will be advised of the state of their entitlements after Friday. 

Midas AustraliaA number of company staff have raised concerns that they have "just lost pay, holiday pay and unpaid superannuation".

This move will remove unprofitable company shops and along with them, unwanted leases previously negotiated where a franchisee was expected to pay exorbitant rent.  Along with company shop leases, it is expected that Midas will rid itself of something in the vicinity of 15 to 20 leases on already closed shops.

The new owners, expected to be John Fletcher and Lazard Carnegie Wylie (previously directors with Philip Bonney), will most likely be announced 12 January. 

0
Your rating: None

12 Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
SOMEWHAT CONFUSED by Guest
Am I showing my ignorance of franchising after being burnt by a supposedly respected franchisor, but once a franchise relies on the sale of franchises for income and expansion rather than the underyling business (which in theory is profitable or they wouldn't be franchising it...sorry - very tongue in cheek) why isn't it pyramid selling To me, franchising is just one big scam, and I'd love someone to convince me otherwise. The evidence in favour of the scam side is pretty solid!!!
CONFUSED? by Guest
I can understand your being confused but it really is quite simple actually.. Pyramid selling keep selling till everyone goes broke except for the bloke who sets it up. While on the other hand.. Franchising keep selling till everyone goes broke except for the bloke who sets it up. Does that make it clearer?
Re: Midas Australia Company Stores Closing by Guest
the money trail probably goes straight to the government and big business
"straight to big business" by Ray Borradale
Ray Borradale's picture
I get the feeling there isn't much left and there will be less when the administrator takes $500,000 for a few weeks work.

The more things change; the more they stay the same.

midas by Lois
What is the ACCC and the government going to do about this franchise crisis. 4 big companies have gone down because of greed and mismanagement...this is not what the franchisees purchased, it seems to me that Australia has some big franchise problems, some big bullies for franchisors and this does not breed a culture of confidence in small business
Re: midas by Guest
The whole problem with the ACCC and the FCA is they simply don't want to see the problem, let alone admit there is a problem, especially the ACCC By admitting it, they are confirming what we already suspect - they are completely ineffective The FCA...don't get me started on the FCA - they are a complete farce. They are a fox looking after the hens The real prblem lies in the fact that for too long the ACCC have protected franchisors apart from a few token prosecutions of 'small' franchises. The ACCC is more concerned with the impact on existing franchisees in a chain as opposed to nipping things in the bud early, and protecting the name and goowill etc. Too many people are adversly affected if the big boys are named and shamed by action from a public authority!!!!
Re: midas by Ray Borradale
Ray Borradale's picture

That is exactly the point missed by those who could make a difference.

The FCA and the ACCC won't commit to repairing the repuation of franchising in Australia; in fact, they deny there is a real problem. 

FCA at least had the good manners to 'move [Les'] deck chairs' by changing most of the directors [but leaving Giles/Deacons]; while at the ACCC it was the end of Chairman Samuel's term - but after review he is still there.

Politicians have previously ignored the potential for these disasters; because that would have meant dealing with a complex franchisee protection issue.  They have all gambled with an industry that provides 14% of Australia's GDP.  

These business collapses and the franchisee failures are the huge costs today.  Tommorrow it can, and probably will, continue.

The more things change; the more they stay the same.

Midas unravelled by Guest
With Midas now under external administration will the actions of its former directors and employees now be unravelled? Does Australian law provide for administrators to examine where the money trail leads? If so, and if the claims that have been made that significant sums of advertising and rent have been diverted are true, then Phillip Bonney must have sone real concerns on his mind. Perhaps it is now time for all those who have made these claims to now repeat them to the administrator. With one former high level employee about to face court on charges of extortion of a franchisee and now the administration it does appear the whole lot is starting to become all very public. How did the Australian regulator miss all of this?
How did the Australian regulator miss all of this? by Ray Borradale
Ray Borradale's picture

They didn't! They just pretended to.  "Off the record" comments reported from meetings and functions clearly indicated that Graeme Samuel and John Martin [ACCC], and Joe Hockey MP and Fran Bailey MP [both Small Business Ministers at the time] knew Midas was a "terrible situation".  But it was all too hard and after all; they were only mere franchisees. 

The ACCC couldn't go up against Deacons [FCA] and get their collective asses whooped, that would have been embarrassing to the government, and besides, the FCA was/is the industry advisor to the ACCC. 

They lunched together, they drank together and the scutllebutt is that they even .... no I won't go there.

The administrator should be required to investigate Midas.  He has the power to do just that.  All they have to do is investigate the money trail to PBH [Philip Bonney Holdings] from Midas.  All they have to do is get advertising industry reports.  Then they can build a gallows.

Maybe everyone in Australia was wrong?  Lets find out?

The more things change; the more they stay the same.

So will they? by Guest
So will the administrator investigate? Are there any Ozzies standing up and formally asking the administrator to follow the money trail? Two options - silence and it all goes away or stand up and Bonney joins his lacky in the dock facing criminal charges.
Re: So will they? by Ray Borradale
Ray Borradale's picture

The administrator has been hammered but he is non-committal - meaning probably not.  It was a scam before administration - during administration - and don't expect much to change after administration.

9 February will be an interesting day in Court - for some strange reason I received a subpoena?  I believe it is a case of 'mistaken identity' - I was 2,000 miles away playing golf that night.

The more things change; the more they stay the same.

This Midas article is not worthy by Ray Borradale
Ray Borradale's picture
of a news blog: 

Midas Australia up for sale after collapsing into administration

And this was my response to the editor of SmartCompany.com.au;

Amanda,

below is the real situation at Midas.  I expect you will delete it however; you can feel free to refer to any part of it when this becomes public over the next week.  And it will.

..............................

Rumours abound throughout the automotive and franchising industries that Ferrier Hodgson have already found a buyer in John Fletcher [ex-Brambles & Coles/Myer] and Lazard Carnegie Wylie, both previously partners in the Midas business.  The industry grapevine is suggesting that they have staged a coup to remove ex-director Philip Bonney and to take a broom to unwanted leases on closed shops and unprofitable company shops.

Today 3 Midas company shops closed in Sydney and 1 in Perth and others received an email suggesting they "be careful about bookings next week; you may be undergoing renovations".  Renovating would be a first for an administrator.  Existing franchisees suggested there would be very few company shops that would pass as viable and expect that either all will be closed, or at least the majority will be closed.

The suggestion that the company has been "hit hard by the global credit crisis" and the Midas LPG program was hit by 'petrol prices' is at best misleading.  

Midas suffered acute negative supplier confidence due to a history of poor compliance to payment terms.  

Smart Company refers to ex-franchisees and legal action.  The ex-Midas franchisee group has been evolving and growing where submissions to the recent Federal Inquiry into franchising saw Midas complaints referring to the high level of franchisee turnover, unconscionable conduct, criminal complaints, misrepresentation and fraud; to name but a few of the issues. 

Most of these issues were referred to as far back as 2004 by Paul Barry on A Current Affair. And in 2005 by Jacqui Walker in BRW.  And as far back as Peter Switzer in the Australian in 2004, 2005 and 2006. As a franchising brand this company will never recover from the media, political and internet coverage.  It was 'hit' long before the 'global crisis'.

Mr Georges says he is getting "good support" from employees and landlords but he cannot be talking to those I have contacted. They are fearful and looking elsewhere.  They see that it is obvious where this mess is going and while the administrator collects his estimate of $500,000, they believe they are about to lose out. 

Mr Georges suggests that the network contains 91 centres; the Midas website indicates there are 89 in total with 45 company operations under threat - 41 after today. 

Smart Company contacted 'stores' that suggested they wanted to remain with the brand however; I contacted many of the franchisee network who stated they do not want to remain with the brand.  I also contacted many of the company shops. They expect they will be unemployed within 1 to 2 weeks.

No matter what Mr Georges says; Midas is not in good shape.  The brand and systems have been ignored by the franchisor for a number of years.  The franchise financial model is a disaster and needs to be demolished and rebuilt from the ground up.  If franchising isn't based on the success of the franchisees then it will eventually fail because of franchising reputation.  This is the Midas outcome.

To re-design the Midas financial model will be costly for a new owner but if it isn't 'attacked' then the trouble at Midas will continue with a new owner. 

Midas advertising since 2000 has taken a 'sharp decline'; franchisees attribute this to a failure to spend from 'their advertising fund'.  Rebuilding the public awareness of this brand will take years and a large advertising budget. 

Rebuilding the franchise financial model and rebuilding the Midas brand might sound simple enough; but it will require investors with very deep pockets and a long-term agenda. 

This administrator has been simply 'puffing' to conceal that the fire sale has been completed with the 'best offer' coming from Fletcher and LCW - and they are short-term investors. 

The Midas saga seems destined to continue.  And more franchising victims will fall and with these investors we will probably see another administration of Midas in the future.

The more things change; the more they stay the same.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Notifications