Quiznos New CEO Dave Deno Speaks
Dave Deno, the newly promoted CEO of Quiznos speaks about why growth has slowed, store profitability and franchise relations. Judging from the answers, it is evident that Quiznos leaders are scratching their heads to answer how to tame their mountain of franchisee discontent.
CEO Deno tells reporter Dina Berta of Nation's Restaurant News that Quiznos is looking to build multi-unit operators in addition to their current chain characterized by small, single-unit mom & pop shops.
Will having more experienced multiunit operators help with franchisee relations?
Deno: My whole career has been about great relationships with franchisees. I could never figure out why systems argue with each other when they should be united to beat the competition. Let’s get the system unified and behind the great Quiznos brand. We are increasing communication with franchise owners and working on expanding with multiunit operators.
Deno's answer to uniting franchisees is by increasing multi-unit franchise owners that are more receptive to the corporate message. If increasing communication means simply sending more corporate messages to franchise owners, then change is not in the air for a network that has become known as one of the industry's most heavy-handed in relations between a franchisor and its franchisees.
The interview continues:
What is Quiznos doing to improve franchisee profitability?
Deno: Every day we’re trying to reduce costs for the franchise owner. Our purchasing organization is locking in prices. We’ve gotten away from doing a lot of couponing. Instead, we introduced the $5, $7 and $9 sandwiches as well as our $2 Sammies [flatbread sandwiches]. Our transactions are up significantly.
Say what?? Deno seems to say, "Let me answer your question about increasing the franchisee's bottom line . . . Uhm, our top line is up significantly through $2, $5 and $7 sandwiches."
Such answers fall short of the mark for a CEO of such a large chain. They are short and provide little meat.
But there is a ray of hope. It is in this message:
Deno: "My whole career has been about great relationships with franchisees."
Such a sentiment sounds like Quiznos' new CEO may not want a franchise relationship mess during his turn at the wheel. Engaging and listening to the Quiznos independent franchisee association, TSFA, would be a good start instead of terminating dissenting leaders and ignoring the association. Stopping the flood of franchisee legal torts would be another.
More messages from corporate won't do a thing.
Quiznos' franchisees, what do you think of the interview?

Ok. Here is what we should do. Corporate gets a TARP loan from the govenerment and buys out distressed or closed franchizes. Corporate can pay...say $100K for a store still in business and say...$50K for one that has closed. Thus making them company owned stores. Corperations do this all the time. This would be a bargin for Corp. and a life line to franchize owners who are looking at 15 to 25,000 from this black Knight running around buying Quiznos. You know the knight isn't going to keep the Q name on them. He is buying the location. Again, I insist corperate get involved, SOMEHOW! We as owners were and are there for them. Even when corperate was on their BAM parties all over the world at our expence. HELP!!! Jim from Fargo
Dangerous Dave is out and they have the original lunkhead back in. Quiznos Corporation is all for themselves and no one else. Beleive me I know where of I speak! I'm a reovering Franchise owner. They are selling them to 3rd world refugees for as little as $3,000.00 & this is why quality and service is so bad.
They do these controversial commercials so they can get some coverage. Their budget is nil due to the fact that so many good owners are forced to close up, and being replaced by unqualified owners.
Incidentally for all those who say the subs are smaller than Sub-way, you are right but thy don't hide it. It clearly says that their subs are 5", 8" and 11".
The self-proclaimed Dream Team is falling apart. We have an organization that is splitting apart at the seams. Executives leaving for unknown reasons being replaced with even less experienced people.
Here it is in a nutshell. The Quiznos business model is broke. Corporate knows it, franchise owners know it. It's no secret. These Bozos picked a fight with Subway, got their noses bloodied and are now in full retreat. Of course the true losers here are the owners who had to shut their doors because of being put in the middle of a no-win battle with Subway.
I would not be surprised to see the help desk personnel have a V.P. on their title sometime soon.
From a registered member, who also is a Q owner .........
Q laid off 20% of their workforce on Friday. That's a fact!
How do I know ? I asked the consultant who replaced our local consultant, who was laid off.
Q has lost several hundred stores just this calendar year.
Estimated range is 600 - 900. And no, you will never get an exact answer from Denver.
Just drive around your city, and you are sure to see one or two boarded up.
"Q laid off 20% of their workforce on Friday. That's a fact! How do I know ? I asked the consultant who replaced our local consultant, who was laid off." - Guest
Thank you.
I'm assuming "local consultant" is what the Quiznos system calls a field operations manager, an employee of the franchisor corporation who consults local franchises on operational issues. Is that correct?
Ex-zee wrote: "A 20% cut in work force does not necessarily indicate a poorly run business. It could simply be fluctuations in the market."
A 20% RIF in a day is a shockwave - given the fact that Q was not a bloated organization by any stretch.
It is indicative of the failure of the business model.
If "X" percent (pick a number) of the stores could not turn a profit under the model, it had to catch up with corporate at some point.
The sad part is throughout the decline, Q's attitude is "we have done no wrong ".
And on the Friday VM update, they will spin this event as improving operational efficiencies, to enhance store owners profits !
For the few of us power readers that skim through the comment area, it confirms again that guest postings are the ones to ignore.
To our wacky thinking guest, who thinks that the obligation is on someone else to prove them wrong. Consider this . . .
Since they are anonymous, guests are particularly under scrutiny to provide evidence to almost anything they say.
The original poster stated they were a Quiznos franchise owner. That provides credibility when talking about their experience. It still is incumbent on that poster to provide credible evidence if they make claims for the franchisor's performance in lay-off percentage.
Any reasonable reader will want to know how a Maine franchisee (let's say for argument) knows that 20% of the staff in Denver was laid off. Are they estimating this from the way the voice bounces off the walls when they place a phone call to the support center because they are assuming this is obviously due to a lack of warm bodies to absorb the sound?
who was Sam Giancana's man in Texas. The mob had paid Joe Kennedy a lot of money to get Bobby Kennedy off Jimmy Hoffa's back. Joe died within minutes of receiving the money, and Bobby never got clued in.
The hit on JFK was revenge for the Kennedys taking the mob's money and not delivering on their promise to "fix" Bobby.--
Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com, has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com, has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
I thought movie mogul Oliver Stone proved once and for all that the JFK assassination was actually a coup d' etat by VP Lyndon B. Johnson.
Inquiring minds want to know - was the mob in on the coup? And did the franchise industry play a part? Solomon will give us the real scoop to these hidden mysteries of history.
End of story
Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com, has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com, has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
something different?--
Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com, has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com, has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
Are you a dues paying, card carrying member of the TSFA?
Have you volunteered your time and efforts to the common cause?
Have you recruited other owners to join ?
If the answers are NO; then you have no right to be impatient.
If you answer YES, then pardon me.
To answer your original question, it is usually quiet before the storm ..........
Franchisors like putting franchises close together. Franchisors are paid royalty on top line sales. If there are two stores next door to each other, store one may take a 40% cut in customers and revenues while store two also takes a 40% cut. But the two stores combined may net the franchisor 30% more in royalties on sales. That's why territory encroachment isn't an important issue for many franchisors but such a practice can be the kiss of death for individual franchise owners.
Question: Are Q Zees working to grow their independent franchisee association to demand that territorial rights be put into their agreements?
Many years ago KFC franchisees formed the KFC franchisee association to press for such rights. In the beginning, there was war with the corporate head office. Many lawsuits. In the end, the independent assocation negotiated a deal.
KFC retaurants now have territory rights. If I recall correctly, units are guaranteed no other KFC within 2 miles or so much population. Of course, multi-unit operators can put their stores as close as they want to their own units.
Franchise Advisory Councils, comprised of owners selected by the franchisor to act as a go-between, historically do not negotiate such contentious issues. It seems only independent franchisee associations have the hutzpah to negotiate such onery clauses on behalf of their members.
Are Q franchisees banding together? How many members does the Toasted Subs Franchisee Association have? Is their association working with other associations for help?
Or are the majority of Q franchise owners unconcerned about matters of territory encroachment until it happens to them?
Darnelle wrote: " Are Q franchisees banding together? How many members does the Toasted Subs Franchisee Association have? Is their association working with other associations for help?"
Q owners are banding together under the direction of the TSFA.
I don't know how many members the TSFA has, but suffice it to say, they have enuf for Q to take notice.
Trying to work issues with Q has been a fruitless exercise todate; hence the TSFA has filed grievance complaints in 3 state courts, soon to be 4 .... 5 .... 6 ......... until national class action status is achieved.
The "mandatory pricing" directive by Q has been instrumental in growing the membership ranks of the TSFA.
Guest wrote: "Can you see a scenario in which customers take for granted all of those things and yet begin to question how many coins they have in their pocket?"
Sure I can.
All I was trying to say was, charging premium prices only works with providing exceptional service.
As a consumer, if a gas station provides clean restrooms, has windsheild cleaning supplies stocked at all times and has a friendly staff, I will overlook the fact their pricing is 5c/gal. more that the unkempt station down the road.
Quiznos is a perfect Sheep-Wolf business model. Wolves eat sheep.
Franchise investors can't distinguish between a wolf and a dog, so they sign contracts with wolves that grant permisssion for the wolves to eat them.
Since sheep were put here to be fleeced and eaten, why is anyone surprised or upset? When you order leg of lamb in a restaurant, do you in your tender and merciful heart give a damn that some sheep is walking around on three legs just so you can eat his fourth leg?
Why is obvious logic, based upon the natural cycles of creation, so upsetting to you.
Of course, had you invested in a sheep dog before you went in to play with the wolves, like any experienced and intelligent shepard would always do, you might not get eaten by the wolf. How is it that this escapes so many people with MBA degrees and twenty years corporate business experience?
Is the answer that corporate people are just Stepford Wife organization folks, able to do as they are told without thinking, and eventually unable to think insightfully - mere Zombies in a real world?
GET A SHEEP DOG, YOU FRANWADS!!--
Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com, has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com, has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
Victories are nothing to brag about. No one - no matter how great he may think he is - wins all his cases. You have to try a certain number of cases to have any credibility. I have represented angels and scoundrels with equal enthusiasm.
I don't publish what I publish out of any sense of pity for the ignorant. I publish what I publish in the (apparently forelorn) hope that the ignorant may become educated - something Michael Webster and Paul Steinberg have been preaching also in here for a very long time. Insisting upon remaining ignorant is Stupid. I hate stupidity, and freely insult all who think they can walk into a street fight environment and make it safely through the area with country club capabilities.
You are correct that I am not omniscient. But I do get most of them correctly sorted out - perhaps because I have been in this business for so many years and bring some insight to the task.--
Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com, has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
Richard Solomon, FranchiseRemedies.com, has over 45 years experience with franchise litigation and crisis management. He is a graduate of The Citadel and The University of Michigan Law School
We do not ban franchise thought here, whether it is a franchisor's postings or paid advertisement. I would remind our readers that Blue MauMau is not a consumer advocacy site where we ban advertising that do not meet our advocacy position.
This is a site that is dedicated to pull news from all sides to provide investors with as much information as possible to make an educated investment decision. This site is a marketplace, albeit one that isn't shy of insider articles that call a spade a spade.
Mr. Blue MauMau
Moderator
I keep reading there are less. Who knows the actual numbers?
The encroachment problems? I keep reading the FDD is negotiable. I haven't read any stories where the zees have ever got their way when they try to negotiate anything. If there are zees out there who negoiated anything with Q I am sure there are many who will love to hear about it.
On the new FDD the franchise we were involved was started by Rick Schaden and other Q people. It now says they can open another club even if it is right next to you. This was not written in the 2006 UFOC. In fact Rick Schaden's name is not mentioned on the 2006 UFOC.
It boils down to it doesn't matter what zors say. It is what is written in their disclosures. (FDD) In many states they require up to date information if it affects your decision to sign or not to sign. In fact there are states that require quarterly updates for new franchise wannabees. If something significant happens in a month the zor is required to disclose it. ANYTHING that influences your decision to sign or not to sign.
Who the heck really knows ......... ?
They are closing at such a fast clip, that even Q cannot keep track of how many they have !
It has been widely reported that stores that have been closed for weeks are still listed on Q's website.
Do your own investigation. People wake up.
I identify with your feelings. I got caught up with another of the Q people scams. We go into business trusting and go out the opposite. Their all the same people. May they go out with what they deserve. No respect, no money and the suffering they have caused all of us.
Guest wrote: "Major shareholders are no doubt thrilled that Quiznos Corp is making more money during difficult economic times. In corporate America, that's a good thing. If the company were public, the market would reward such leadership."
Guest - you make some good points, even though they are not what the individual store owners want to hear ..............
As for the number of store closures, we may not know the exact number, but we can be pretty sure the growth rate is negative for this year.600+ closures is a good guestimate.
Q's strategy of making more money, while their customers (franchise owners) go broke is unsustainable in the mid-term.
At a minimum, this will stall new store sales; much more so than has already happened.
Morale at HQ is in the tank, with RIF's, paycuts, constant news of store closures.
Morale of FO's is in the gutter, with mass rebellion against the low mandated resale prices ($2/5/7/9)
Q hides behind their extremely one sided FA which serves to protect them; but I predict that FA will also cause their downfall, as when presented with the big picture, judges will look at that FA with a different lens.