Where Franchising Is Going in 2009
Franchising firms will traverse some very defiant marketplaces, while stretching cash flow, paying excessive costs for quality lead generation, and begging for credit to operate while helping franchisees buy into the system. Credit remains a foremost stumbling block in 2009. Most industries under the big tent of franchising suffer from the credit crash, others will not. Retail real estate is cold, with malls across the country foreclosing in 2009, shuttering franchise-leased space with little notice. We will see hotels, shopping hub big box stores, and strip centers go dark, as commercial mortgages fail and lenders walk away, stung by huge financial losses and devaluation of property.
Chains now look exhaustingly to their leadership to rewire the business plans for survival. Outside franchise consultants, retail experts and business industry specialists will be in demand to solve the retail vagueness and economic puzzle. Job losses will race to nearly double-digit scores as the nation and the world heads through a prolonged recession. This recession has already produced penny-conscious buyers putting a needs test to everything they purchase. Overall spending will be down in '09. Perceived mid-level shopping, where retail is king, has the products the shopper is contented to buy. Branded chains will provide reward points to stabilize customers while insuring repeat buyers. Spending habits change by the day with fewer stores available to buyers, who stake out their territory for shopping and drive only in that area. The coveted age group of 20 to 40 now understands the financial insecurity and risks that come with frivolous buying. Careful spending changes retail’s approach to this market, and many of the industries within franchising.
Paring of store inventories will produce faster product turnaround sales while catching new wave products, all helping to move through the season quickly. This will help bring shoppers back. It is not your mother or father’s kind of marketing. This is niche servicing. Mom and pop will gain plenty of attention from franchisors in the care industries, including home and health, entertainment, education and physical fitness.
For those who have built good branded chains, and are ready to spin them off to a venture capital or private equity firm, think again. What you valued your system at last year, is not what it is worth today. Plan on working longer to build up solid equity value, or sell for less. Franchising has never been a good bet for quick-change leadership. You must know your franchisees, their family members, personal financial position, health, and embrace this package. It is a way of life, not a road to financial welfare for the founder or investor.
Franchising is still in command with a staggering 41 to 43 percent of our nation’s total retail sales and service dollars pouring through the system, according to International Franchise Association figures. It’s an employment engine on fire and it produces wealth right through economic hard times. You don’t need an MBA to succeed. Everyone is in it together to win. Franchising is the profitable wonder machine that plows through all challenges and persistently produces success. It’s constantly achieving growth across our nation and around the world year after year.
The modern method of franchising is a powerhouse for investors too. They clamor to buy more branded systems, rework them, build up the value, and sell them to another investor. Franchising is a colossal international movement of broad-based business segments. Franchising is a privilege filled with responsibilities, a series of successful habits predicated upon a few great thoughts implemented by good employees, and driven by visionary leadership.
In franchising, we let others do the pioneering; and then, with franchisees, we do it bigger, more quickly, and efficiently in large numbers. The founder took the time, economic risk, built the business model, while showing the franchisee how to do it, upgrading the system along the way. Franchising is to succeed through the work of others. The franchisor has done all the testing and costly up-front mistakes in the marketplace. Dynamic relations between the franchisor and franchisee exist to promote the growth of the chain. This allows for solid communications, superior customer experience, and street-driven sales knowledge flowing in both directions. Each party shares in the commitment and vision as they march lockstep to establish values, foster brand development, create corporate culture, set marketing directions, and cultivate bottom-line-enhancing worth.
Franchising invites everyone to join. And 2009 will be an especially challenging 12 months, while it crosses all lines of society and embraces almost anyone who is ready, willing, and able to work. In franchising, the success of both the franchisee and the franchisor is truly dependent upon the success of each other. That symbiotic relationship thrives on the willingness to prepare for success. Through constant and consistent training of the franchisee, franchisors strive to improve and to increase the system’s value. But each entity must be willing to invest in the other.
Successful franchisees are captivated by the business while investing in their future. They should be infatuated with the force that goes into the thriving development expansion and basic commerce of the brand they buy into for growth. They will possess good work habits, business ethics, people skills and a burning in the belly.
At the same time franchisors in 2009 become so because they have come to wisdom through success and failure alike. Very little wisdom emanates just from success alone. I’ve found that franchisees buy into the system because they are betting on the quality of the franchisor’s failures as much as the quality of the success. Franchisors must eliminate the franchisee’s reason for failure. To remove risk, franchisors are obliged to consistently test, refine and add to their products and services that augment the brand value for both parties.
For the last year in this decade, what will make franchising successful in this strapped economy are the franchisors’ tested methods of doing business and their unending search for good franchisees to grow the system with new units. They’re looking for someone who wishes to borrow as much as the other is willing to lend, and at the same time remain focused on the common progress of that system. Franchising itself is bountiful enough for the non-pioneer and the pioneer to walk next to each other equally.
With this demanding economy, nobody said that franchising was easy or that it didn’t take hard work to be successful. The secret that makes the business of franchising thrive so soundly lies in the people who make it run. Essential knowledge for any employer is that there are three ways to get a job accomplished---you do it yourself, you employ someone or you forbid your children to do it!
Without a quality workforce and unwavering management team the franchising system of business could not provide the excellent price points, branded quality, consistent training and elevated efficiency of service for which it’s celebrated worldwide. Success in franchising implies optimism, mutual competence and fair play. Franchisors have to hold a high opinion of the worth of their company, what they sell, and feel that the product or service they provide is the best their employees can produce for their business. Franchising makes the world a much better place in which to live and to work, and acknowledges everyone’s success throughout a branded system. Franchisors have faith in their organization and their staffs, that they have a profound desire to help others succeed. Clear, definite vision and consciousness allow them to generate the fusion of people working together with franchisees.
In this new global economy, franchisees pay less attention to what franchisors say and more attention to what they do. This brings even more focus on the franchise system workforce. A dynamic franchisor hires quality people whom he or she encourages and enable to become the finest employees they can be. Those destined for success never underestimate the ability of their workforce to exceed their expectations as they labor toward a better tomorrow.
If you are a franchisor planning to succeed in an economy filled with valleys, hills, mountains, rivers, tight credit and techno-driven business plans, the following guideposts will help you navigate this brave new world:
You must be a risk taker to discover the new opportunities and lose sight of the shore to find the ocean.
Make the ordinary the extraordinary and look ever forward into a Technicolor marketplace that is changing under your feet.
Assemble a management team that shares your passion with an unyielding workforce. Time should not be boundaries.
- Be obsessive about commitment to execution. Clearly focus on achieving one goal at a time and know it when you get there.
Possess an uncompromising, steadfast moral business compass. Work reflects your life along with what you are and who you are.
Match your business with other businesses that complement and embrace your zeal and values. One and one make three in this economy.
Be confident enough to help and encourage others along the way. This responsibility may not be fulfilled, but will always be rewarded. Everyone and everything around you is a teacher. Continue teaching your franchisees bottom-line enhancements.
If you can’t explain it to your mother or grandmother, you really shouldn’t do it.
You cannot demonstrate leadership by pointing in the direction you want to go and telling people to go there. Leaders go to that place. They show the way. People will follow their leader. We must instill passion in the workplace and let people know it is a mistake to believe they are merely working for the company. Always strive for employees to work with you and not for you, just as franchisees work for themselves, in their units, but not by themselves. For franchising in 2009, it’s seeing what other people don’t see and pursuing that vision first with good people.
End of Part 1 of a 2 part series. Read Where Franchising Is Going, Part 2
--
© Copyright Franchise Recruiters Ltd., Published by Blue MauMau with permission.
Jerry Wilkerson is a former president and executive director of the International Franchise Association in Washington, D.C. and founder of Franchise Recruiters Ltd., an international franchise management executive search corporation with offices in Chicago and Toronto. He recently completed his 31st year in the business of franchising. For more information or clarification, contact Jerry Wilkerson, 708.757.5595 or email franchise@att.net. Visit franchiserecruiters.com.
- Franchise topic:
- Enter Your Own Tag:


Those wanting to be own boss easily scammed. Along with Solomon's blogs it is one of the best things published on BMM. I know that first hand along with 39 zees.
If bad zors would only tell us we were not going to get good business advice I know all of us wouldn't of signed and made our own plans. Very misleading and sad. Result many people hurt. We got the impression that we would get sound business advice. Now I know there are good zees but ours was not. Maybe they should put it in front of the FDD because since most of us were not business majors we could of sought another route. Like someone wrote, " Business advice for $20,000?" I believe they should be up front about this. Instead of advertising we will be there for you. Instead of telling us we were on our own after a month. They lead us down the road to poverty. Life has changed for us. Will anyone acknowledge the pain it has caused us. I know the zor does not care. Please people who read on BMM and are looking for a job call Richard, Paul or Michael. Seek a good zor and investigate. All this knowledge on BMM is valuble. Please listen to them. YOu are fleeced when you sign. Time. Take your time. Time can be a deal killer. Take it from someone who is normally an upbeat personality. I am working on being myself. I want to be happy again. I am thankful for BMM.
People will "buy" a job for themselfs. Getting credit to open a business could be hard and really slow things down. Once you get your Franchise open, who's going to buy your product? We're going to have a bunch of businesses with no customers. You'll have a bunch of people fail in their first 12-24 months and then they'll be jobless and bankrupt.
I'm sure that Siebert is right in that deals will start getting done when credit is available.There's some deals being done now.
If Siebert is right in that credit is made available in the Fall of 2009, what number of people will be able to afford a franchise? How loose will be the credit compared to the past? And how much of people's wealth will have bounced back? Will those buying a franchise be 40% less than the same time in 2008?
Will the boom in franchising be the sound of franchise developer, weak from starvation, hitting the floor or a boom of franchising crossing the sonic barrier for the first time?
Anyone have anything for what kind of levels will likely happen compared to the past?
I think that is a fair comment. It also gives us something concrete to benchmark.
If franchising follows in tandem with the real estate market —there was an article about how long the average real estate bubble takes to recover. Yes, here it is — average of 5 years to recover.
Since the recession started in December of 2007, that means we are looking at December 2012 - a bad month for real estate investment.
So lets say that franchising will spring back to 2007 levels in the Spring of 2013. It should be pointed out that this particular housing bubble is not average. We may be too optimisitic.
What does the real estate market look like for 2009? Fortune says that the housing crash has not bottomed out yet. It looks like it continues to drop in 2010.
problem. He knows everything follows real estate. People who have had a bankruptcy will be able to refinance. He wants to stop the foreclosures. Being a real estate agent I know this. It was in the first few pages of the books I studied for real estate.
When someone buys a house they are charged triple in interest.. If the bill passes it will stop the foreclosures. When people loose their homes there are taxes lost and the banks looses. When real estate tanks everything does. Even franchising. I am not against franchising when things are done ethically, honest and open.
The bill is in the making. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that when real estate tanks everything follows. We need to help main street save their homes so real estate can prosper. When people have homes of their own they will spend to buy everything to keep up their house. When people sense prosperity people will have the confidence to spend. The end result is the economy will get better. When people are worried they will hold on to their money. Nothing will move. Something has to change. Even Microsoft is planning layoffs. No one is spending money. I see resturants closing here in Washington. People are eating at home. People are not spending money in shopping malls. I am a capitalist. My bad experience in franchising has shown me the bad side of capitalism and that is greed. I am still a capitalist but with values and ethics.
I forgot to mention that Boeing is planning to lay off 4500 employees in the Paciific Northwest. Things are not getting better. Obama will inherit tremendous issues. Not to mention the baby boomers are getting older. (Those born in 1946-1964.) Jobs are getting scarce for the baby boomers. Many are losing their jobs because of age. We have discrimination laws but there are new laws that wipe out those laws. Since many of the baby boomers lost in the stock market they are going to have to work longer. We lost in franchising and retirement is not foreseen in the near future, we will have to keep on working. I would not want to have Obama's position. Would you?
If people are worried and not spending you have to be a brave soul to buy a franchise or open any business when you see them going out in bad times. Franchises need people willing to spend money to prosper.
FuwaFuwaUsagi
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers."
FuwaFuwaUsagi
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers."
and think very highly of you as I do all the lawyers on BMM.
I have in my life time always paid my bills. Until we got into franchising. People who have any character have that attitude. We lived a modest life even when we had money.
I agree with you that people will have to change their standards to more historically conventional standards.
According to contract law there is no way misrepresentations and puffing material facts is allowed. In fact when misrepresentations can be proven it makes the contract unenforceable. (Puffing material facts is not allowed.)
I doubt if Obama will be able to fix the many problems our nation faces with our economy. We have bailed out banks and the CEO's got huge bonuses. People in high places are not sacraficing for the benefit of the business. No wonder why main street is upset. It is down right depressing.
Let's go back to basics. We need to regulate big businesses because of human nature. (Greed) If all people were ethical and trust worthy we would not need policemen or prisons. That is reality and the truth.
FuwaFuwaUsagi
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers."
FuwaFuwaUsagi
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers."
qualified many people for loans to get them in a house which never should of been qualified I do believe it is the right thing to do. Many were immigriants that never should of been able to buy a house. (I am not saying all loan officers are unethical. I know many that are fantastic human beings and follow the golden rule. Which is a realtors first rule to abide by.) They just got them in a house no matter what.
The fact that after you pay on a house for 30 years how much is interest? Triple the amount the house cost? It is my understanding the banks are going to eat some of the interest so people can stay in their homes. It makes sense to me. Does it to you?
Do we agree something has to be done to stop the foreclosures?
In franchising this is good news for people who would otherwise loose their homes. We need to stop the foreclosures. When people see many foreclosures they will not have the confidence to stimulate the economy.
FuwaFuwaUsagi
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers."
FuwaFuwaUsagi
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers."
How about all the taxes that will be lost. (Property taxes.) The banks will still loose because people will default on their loans. Real Estate investors will have a field day and there goes our middle class. What made America great is our middle class. It is my understanding that China now has a bigger middle class than us. Will we be the haves and have nots? Fuwa many people got screwed by bad loan officers. In fact looking back I can see many loan officers using the same techniques as bad zors. Using high profile people's names like Robert Kayasaki to sell people on pick a payment plans.
Fuwa please tell us your solution to our nation's economy. I am all ears. Like I said I respect your knowledge and opinion.
FuwaFuwaUsagi
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers."
FuwaFuwaUsagi
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers."
FuwaFuwaUsagi
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers."
FuwaFuwaUsagi
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers."
the bank bail outs and the executives paying themselves outrages bonuses? Is that stealing from main street? It seems like a catch 22. Whenever someone comes up with any solution someone is going to get screwed over.
In the world of franchising it seems the zees are the one's that get the shaft.
In the retail business the consumer gets the shaft. (Example: Shoes cost $250.00 at Nordstroms and it might of cost $10.00 to make.)
Real Estate the buyer gets the shaft because most don't have enough money to buy a house cash. That interest pays for people's CD'S and that is okay. I can't believe it all goes to people's interest. Where do you think the excutives get their bonuses and high salaries?
You go to see a specialist because of stress over money problems. Anxiety,headaches or insomnia. Then he slaps you with a $250 bill.
The list is endless.
FuwaFuwaUsagi
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers."
FuwaFuwaUsagi
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers."
exonerates them fom responsibilty. On the other hand people have to take responsibility for misrepresentations and puffing material facts. Being a realtor I have to be very cautious in what I say to people. I can face serious consequences or pay heavy fines or possible jail time and loose my license.
Remember our government has bailed out the big guys at our expense. I believe our government believes we need to stop foreclosures now. Things have become very bad. I have heard many stories of people having to go bankrupt. Not only in franchising but builders, investors in the stock market, people losing jobs. Our future is not looking bright.
Besides if there are no jobs to be found what are you to do? Fuwa being a man of substance, don't you care that people are loosing their homes? The way it is going will investors want it now? What if houses go down even more? Is that what their doing waiting for houses to go down and be a carpet bagger like during the Civil War. They took advantage of people's desperation and purchased a plantation for nothing.
It is not always the person's fault if they sign a bad contract. People are scammed all the time. If lies are factors in why someone signs a contract you make it sound like it is their fault.
Conclusion to all this is not trust anyone. Always look for misleading statements in contracts. Consult a killer attorney. The problem is people do not know that franchising is not taught in law school.
Now thanks to site's like BMM people are starting to get educated.
FuwaFuwaUsagi
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers."
FuwaFuwaUsagi
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers."
I do not think the guy down the street should be able to put their hand in a childs pants.
Do you honestly think bad zors have a right to lie to people about the state of their business. Even when they know many have gone out of business? They got in many zees wallets. Because the world is not filled with good lawyers like Solomon it is our fault. I know if I discovered BMM and there was more transparency about our franchise and knew how to tear apart a FDD I would not of even thought about it. Remember not everyone has your brilliant mind in business. I mean that sincerely.
Education is important in business. In fact education is important to know how to deal with people.
I do not like what past generations have done to us and future generations. Maybe they need to get rid of bad business practices. It seems corruption is the cause of many of our problems. I am sorry you think our government is not doing things right. I told you, you should run for mayor. Cut spending and fight corruption.
The beauty of debate is you don't have to agree with everyone. Doesn't change my opinion about you.
FuwaFuwaUsagi
FuwaFuwaUsagi
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers."
I was using the zors as an example.
Fuwa I see your point about government bail outs. I never agreed with government bail outs for businesses. When they started doing that I got upset because I knew everyone would start expecting it. Wall Street, auto industry, banks, housing industry even the porn industry. It's just going to keep going. Milliions of jobs has been lost the past year.
What concerns me is we'll be seeing more homeless families living in places like we have in Seattle called Nicklesville. People living in tents and getting kicked out of practically every place they put up their tents.
Fuwa it is too late. I doubt if Social Security will be around when we retire. If we ever get to retire. Satistics say if you take 100 men at age 65, one is financially well off. The others are either dead or dead broke. Not good numbers.
Are we close to a depression? Remember the old saying during the Great Depression, "Buddy can you spare a dime?" Because of inflation will we be saying, "Buddy can you spare a ten?"
intend, may, shall, should, estimate words that can have different meanings. Yes there are real estate issues. Often times because of misrepresentations, non-disclosure issues. Puffing material fact is also an issue. Steering or realtors saying an area is bad.
All issues in the franchising world. People who study franchising can see how people get screwed in the world of franchising.
Are you saying there are no such thing as contract laws that protect people. Then you are the fool here. Not me.
Actually, Wilkerson is not forecasting the future of franchising, and unfortunately the title of the article does not reflect the substance which provides solid operating tips for any environment.
Wilkerson does make some very good points.
My objection to Part 1 is that Wilkerson clings to the old IFA view that "Franchising is the profitable wonder machine that plows through all challenges and persistently produces success."
Such hyperbole is not credible with an increasingly sophisticated (and jaded) audience, and even the IFA is adopting a more nuanced view: Matt Shay discussing ways of encouraging good practices by franchisors is a tacit acknowledgement that a few bad apples are indeed out there and that they can be the impetus for legislation adversely affecting the interests of well-behaved franchisors.
As noted many times on BMM, there are a small number of zors which dominate the Bad Boy Franchise News.
In failing to distinguish the wheat from the chaff, the risk is not simply legislative action, it is also that prospective purchasers will read about a Quiznos or UPS Store or Cuppys Coffee scandal and assume that since all franchisors are basically the same, these practices are followed industry-wide and hence buying a franchise is foolish.
That is not the case, but in a media environment where scandal spreads across the internet, it behooves franchise supporters to avoid having all franchisors tarred with the same brush.
Wilkerson is a welcome addition to balanced viewpoint presentation on BMM, and I would hope that he will continue to give insight as to "best practices" in the franchise industry.
Paul Steinberg
Franchisee Attorney, New York City, Ph: 212-529-5400
Paul Steinberg, Franchisee Attorney, New York City, Ph: 212-529-5400
FuwaFuwaUsagi
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers."
FuwaFuwaUsagi
"Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers."
Mr. Wilkerson has a lot of expertise in franchising, and has a historical perspective greater than most consultants. There are masses of management mavens out there, but a tiny subset of those specialize in franchising.
So I agree with Mr. Morrill, and moreover I do believe that BMM needs more focus on management/marketing issues with a franchise-centric analysis.
Paul Steinberg
Franchisee Attorney, New York City, Ph: 212-529-5400
Paul Steinberg, Franchisee Attorney, New York City, Ph: 212-529-5400
As to inventory in the sense of amount of any particular product in stock at a given time, this is true so long as you are able to keep enough in stock so that you don't have to turn customers away.
Back when Finkelstein ran Macy*s into the ground in the early '90s, the one thing he did right was manage to keep a razor-thin but sufficient inventory as bankruptcy loomed. But that is an awfully difficult task. Some franchisors such as Subway arrange for very frequent inventory delivery (I used to get 2x/week deliveries) to minimize carrying costs, but you have to have enough buying clout and good purchasing agents.
If we are speaking of different items for sale (Stock Keeping Units, or SKUs) that is a more ticklish story. People do get used to their favorites, and when Brenneman cut back on the number of chip varieties offered at Quizno's, there was customer resistance. Just yesterday I was at the Dunkin opposite the Queens courthouse when a debate broke out on the customer line when it was announced that Dunkin' has discontinued the toasted coconut doughnut.
...well, now I'm starving...off to lunch...
Paul Steinberg
Franchisee Attorney, New York City, Ph: 212-529-5400
Paul Steinberg, Franchisee Attorney, New York City, Ph: 212-529-5400
Wilkerson states, "Paring of store inventories will produce faster product turnaround sales while catching new wave products, all helping to move through the season quickly." He makes a great point.
In a past life, I was in charge of international logistics and operations. In thinking of controlling inventory, I think of 7-Eleven Japan's "just-in-time" pioneering efforts in the 80s and 90s. They used a form of the kanban pull-through system in retailing. When the customer consumed, the inventory replacement system went into gear.
Japan's 7-Eleven was so competitive and effective in minimizing inventory costs that they soon dominated the Japanese landscape. They quickly were in a position to show the American operations how to pioneer retailing practices. Eventually, the original 7-Eleven company in North America was taken over by their Japanese master franchise. 7-Eleven North America is owned by Seven & I Holdings Company of Japan.
The size of a convenience store and available shelf space allotted to a product was less than in the U.S. Because of this limitation and because of the inroads that Prof. W. Edwards Deming made in Japan after World War II in statistical process control, Japanese convenience store chain management had the mindset of being extremely efficient and methodical in keeping the inventory for their store shelves to a minimum while still effectively meeting customer demand. They did not have the associated costs that their U.S. counterparts had.
When deliveries are infrequent, stores have high inventory costs because they have to keep more goods. But as Paul points out, too many deliveries can also cause problems. Vendor trucks delivering $15 in goods to retailers not only individually can create delivery cost bubbles, but also collectively caused Japanese city streets to clog up. BusinessWeek says that sparked 7-Eleven to work on not just pushing costs off to vendors, but also to begin consolidating costs of deliveries:
I don't think many in the U.S. can imagine that sort of frequency and efficiency for a small retail franchise. Japanese franchisees experienced 70 deliveries a day by various vendors. That's a lot for a small convenience store. Considerable costs were passed on to vendors. Moreover, as a customer bought, the inventory was tracked and automated throughout the supply chain.
Here in the U.S., Coca-Cola (a product franchisor) is quite famous for their supply chain management efforts of the 90s. Coca-Cola used activity-based costing that showed supermarket and convenience store customers that activities for different products were different, leading to hidden costs that were not being accounted for. This was a useful tool to help retailers decide which products to handle themselves, which to have vendors handle, and which to pare.
Wilkerson makes a good point in saying, "It is not your mother or father’s kind of marketing." These sorts of supply chain management efficiencies allowed considerable price savings to be passed on to the consumer. Besides lower prices, paring down products also helped create a more crystal-clear marketing image to the consumer of what could be expected at the store.
There still was considerable diversity in product centers. My favorite thing to buy at a Japanese 7-Eleven was fresh rice balls — onigiri. On the way to the door, I could make a few A4-size color copies (a metric size close to American letter-size paper) at the 7-Eleven copy center. It was the equivalent of just twelve cents a sheet some six years ago, which was a fraction of the retail price of the cheapest color copies in the U.S.
- The tip of the iceberg is created with confidentiality agreements and the psychology of cooling out the mark. To speak their truth would be to reveal the ex-franchisee as a traitor to their peers.
Incentives disfavour "good" systems in relation to the the free pass the rogues receive. The low quality pushes out the high quality practices. The trade association's "Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval" is useful to both types of franchising offers. Les Stewart MBAUnderstanding Franchising
Les Stewart MBA FranchiseFool :: WikidFranchise
Friend of Franchising
Firstly; back to the subject of 'stock control' as an example for a number of operational aspects in business. Shouldn't we begin to see more sophistication in the use of computer technology to decide on stock. There are many systems out there where sales data produces required 'stock on hand', reorders and can cater to trends.
The use of Today technology in business is poor; just look at internet communication capabilities. In franchising surely businesses should have access to forward thinking people who are not still adapting to 90's technology. And there is no excuse where technology is so much more 'user friendly'.
On another front - growth; I would suggest that Franchising '09 and forward are going to see more transparency that will lead to better education and decision making by prospective franchisees leading to healthier competition in franchise offerings.
Not necessarily better transparency in disclosure or contracts or regulation; but transparency demanded by continuing to barrage the internet and media with bad franchsing examples and consequences. This will impose a cost to franchising and good franchising should reject the behaviors of the bad.
How the market [in this case franchisors] responds will determine the level of growth.